This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 10)
Dear Mr Bowden
Thank you for your request for information received on 10 September 2019.
Please find attached our response to your reques...
Both the Birmingham Judgment and the more recent Woking Judgment - where widespread election fraud was proved - are available on this excellent website...
It's actually available if you click on "Show quoted sections" in the message, rather than as a separate attachment.
WDTK tries to hide quoted copies...
Dear Mr Bowden,
Thank you for your patience while we responded to your email. Please accept my apologies for this delay.
Details of our Freedom of In...
Have you now referred this to the ICO? I would recommend doing so at this point.
Dear Mr Bowden
It is not possible to give you access to London Borough of Sutton staff
intranet. I therefore attach a screen print of the current...
Dear Mr Bowden
Thank you for your email, which, if I may say, is both reasonable and
thought provoking.
I have noted the comments you have made.
I h...
Dear Mr Bowden
I refer to your recent FOI enquiry regarding External Training costs for Members and Council employees. Please find attached spreadshee...
Link: [1]File-List
Dear Mr Bowden
Please find the response to your request for review, which has been
conducted by Mr Gerrard Tracey, Assistant...
Good Afternoon Mr Bowden,
Please find attached a response to your reply regarding a Freedom Of
Information request.
Kind Regards,
Ruth Wilton
C...
This person's 19 annotations
You may wish to read (or direct the Council to) the Fees Regulation Guidance at http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/freedom_of_information/d...
Interesting that this was cc:ed to a Peter Forrester of CAAL Liverpool. I'm not entirely sure who CAAL are, and Google isn't turning anything useful up...
Aside from any other consideration, they've fundamentally misunderstood how costs are to be calculated.
According to the Fees Regulation Guidance ( h...
With respect to the argument that "my review leads me to conclude that release of the software might be in the public interest only if you were to be p...
I've asked for more information on this as well:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/intranet_foi_page
They have now claimed in another request that
"We are very happy to respond to requests under the Freedom of Information Act which come to us via the...
You may wish to compare with http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/advice_sought_from_information_c where the ICO has already advised that WhatDoTheyKn...
He has now received the advice from the ICO:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/advice_sought_from_information_c
I don't think it's really possible for the GRO to know how many people have never had their birth registered, as, by definition, they won't have a reco...
If you are going to seek a review (which I think you should), I would also note when doing so that your original question ("how the attorney generals o...
I would suggest that you take them up on Option A and "make a service complaint to a more senior manager". This is a significant change of position tha...
Unfortunately, I think unless an authority really _does_ have a piece of paper entitled, "Policy on how to discourage the dammed public from bothering...
The focus on confidentiality here appears to be a complete red herring, as the request was only for summary total figures, not details of any specific...
The letter refers to copy invoices that do not appear to have been attached.
Rejected: Not held centrally and would cost too much to gather.
Summary: Rejected under Section 35 (Formulation of Government Policy).
Summary: no donations made to any of these.
Summary: Does not hold information - suggested The National Archives at Kew, in London as alternative source.
Summary of response: 134 out of ~7500 officers have criminal convictions. This is broken down by Division/Department in the PDF.
