This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 399)
Thank you for tis reply. Well I say thank you but only because it shows how hypocritical and dishonest your cliam of 92 other councils supporting yo...
I have now completed my analysis of your response and it reveals that Newham Borough Council have been misleading their own councillors, their const...
Dear Mr Richardson,
Thank you for your further email of 15 October regarding the submission
made by Newham Council claiming support from 92 other co...
Thankyou for your timely and helpul response.
I will now ask the DCMS for the rest of the information.
Thanks
Yours sincerely,
Richard Rich...
I am out of the office on annual leave and return on Wednesday 22nd July.
Please contact [email address] if your query is urgent,
This e-mail may co...
Dear Mr Richardson
Freedom of Information request F2014.03.157
Please accept our apologies for the delay in the response. We receive a significant nu...
A "right to complain" leaflet was attached to the original response but has been omitted from the replacement. (The substance of the response is the s...
Dear Mr Richardson
I refer further to your emailed query regarding Betting Premises Licences. Sorry again for the delay in getting back to you about t...
Thank you for this complete response that shows total bookmakers by year as:
2007 - 13
2008 - 13 (+2 -2)
2009 - 13
2010 - 12 (-1)
2011 - 13 (+...
Please could you respond to my clarification request regarding this FOI request. That email is reproduced below for your convenience:
Has there be...
Thank you for this complete response, - 7 bookmakers throughout the period - even if it is a bit late. There are about 10 councils yet to answer so...
Dear Mr Richardson
Re: Request for Information
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request which we received on
02/04/2014.
P...
Dear Mr Richardson,
I am a lawyer in the Council’s Legal Team working within the Law and
Governance Service Area.
You have requested an in...
Dear Richard
Please find undernoted information in relation to your recent FOI request.
Licensed Betting Offices which were licensed in East Dunbarto...
Dear Mr Richardson,
Please accept our apologies for the long delay in providing you with a
substantive response to your information request. We...
Dear Mr Richardson
I refer to your recent request for information and your subsequent correspondence. Apologies for the delay in responding, I have n...
Dear Richard,
Firstly I would like to apologise for the delay in our response. My colleague Michelle Rudland has now provided the attached and also a...
Dear Mr Richardson,
Further to your e-mail of 24 July 2014, please find attached an updated
spreadsheet. In some cases the licence holder does not n...
Dear Mr Richardson,
Many apologies for the delay in response. I have been on leave, and unfortunately due to limited resources my colleagues were unab...
Many thanks for this clarification , apologies that my initial FOI was slightly ambiguous re new licences vs total licenced.
Thank you.
Yours si...
Many thanks for this clear and complete reply.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Richardson
Many thanks for this clear and complete response which (including the racecourse) shows:
2007 - 6
2008 - 7 (+1)
2009 - 7
2010 - 7
2011 - 6 (-...
Many thanks for this thorough and complete response.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Richardson
Thanks again.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Richardson
Dear Mr Richardson
We are sorry that we have not answered your request to your satisfaction.
An Internal Review will be conducted by an officer indep...
This person's 13 annotations
This earlier request may be of interest. I chose 2007 as the start date as that is when councils first licenced them not magistrates. I never got a ful...
Might be nice to see it but it is unpublished because it is comercially confidential. The Commission use it to do the industry figures we get delayed a...
As a benchmark for assessing Salford you might like to know that I have asked for the same info from all 326 English councils - 9 are outstanding, 3 In...
2013 is correct - it was -1 +1 not -1 +2
Correction:
2007 17 (1 issued/surrendered in year)
2008 16 (-1)
2009 16
2010 17 (+1)
2011 16 (-1)
2012 16
2013 15 (-1)
2014 16 (+1)
Damn typos
2007 - 19
2008 - 20 (+1)
2009 - 20
2010 - 21 (+1)
2011 - 20 (-1)
2012 - 19 (-1)
2013 - 23 (+4)
2007 = 60
2008 = 63
2009 = 61
2010 = 59
2011 = 61
2012 = 61
2013 = 60
2007 - 16
2008 - 16
2009 - 16
2010 - 15
2011 - 16
2012 - 16
2013 - 16
Haringey LBO
2007 - 64 (+1)
2008 - 66 (+5 -3)
2009 - 61 (+1 - 6)
2010 - 66 (+5 -1)
2011 - 66 (+2 -2)
2012 - 68 (+2)
2013 - 68
2014 - 68 (+1 -...
This was a double click duplication of this request
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/number_of_licenced_betting_offic_2#outgoing-340515
which h...
I have submitted an additional FOI request relating to third party correspondence related to this request.
A new analysis of FOBT in the three prevalence surveys has just been released.
http://www.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/pdf/Examining%20Machine%20Gamblin...
There is a current triennial consultation on this issue here
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/consultation-on-proposals-for-changes-to-max...