This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 54)
Dear Paul Staples,
We refer to your email of 2 June 2023 in which you requested information
under the FOI Act from NHS England.
Your request
You...
Dear FOI,
I will give you until the end of this week
Yours sincerely,
Paul Staples
Our Ref. FoI 2022-23.2702
Date: 17/05/2023
Dear Paul Staples
Freedom of Information Request - Internal Review Decision
Thank you for yo...
Good afternoon,
Please find attached our response to your recent request for an internal
review under the Freedom of Information Act.
Kind...
Dear Paul Staples,
Please find attached our response to your recent Freedom of Information
request (reference FOI2023/02687).
Yours sincerely,
F...
Dear Paul
Please find the attached response to your freedom of information request
and I would like to apologise for the lateness of this respon...
Good Morning Paul
Section 21 - Information accessible by other means
This information is exempt under Section 21 of the FOIA because the
infor...
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request which was received within the Trust.
In accordance with S.1 (1) (a) of the Freedom of Informat...
Dear Paul Staples
Thank you for your FOI request sent on 10 February 2023. You asked:
1. Does your Trust use gov.notify for sending tex...
Dear Requestor,
Thank you for your recent request under the Freedom of Information Act.
Please see below the information you have requested.
...
Dear Mr Staples
With regard to your request for information via the Freedo...
Ref: NIC-698828-F6Y3Y
Dear Paul Staples,
Many thanks for your recent request to NHS England
We have now received a reply to this from our col...
Dear Paul Staples,
Please find attached the Trust’s response to your recent Freedom of
Information request (our reference FOI220778).
We h...
Freedom of Information Act 2000/Environmental Information Regulations 2004
Reference Number: RDF1202.
Dear Mr Staples,
Please find attached our Trust...
Freedom of Information Act 2000/Environmental Information Regulations 2004
Reference Number: RDF1159-22 - Imprivata Software
Dear Mr Staples,
Please...
Dear Paul,
Please find attached our response to your request for information.
Kind regards,
Kath
Kath Thau
Swyddog Rhyddid Gwybodaeth Freedom of I...
Apologies there should have been two attachments
Please see attached.
Data Protection Impact Assessments
Introduction
The Data Protection Impact Ass...
Dear Paul,
Please find attached response to your FOI.
Kind regards
Mark
FOI team
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════...
Dear Paul Staples,
Please find attached our response to your information request, our reference FOI2022/24869.
If you have any queries about this ema...
[1]Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: Des...
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 and your request for an internal review to...
Ref: NIC-643188-N0V0B
Dear Paul Staples,
Many thanks for your recent request to NHS Digital.
We have now received a reply to this from ou...
Dear Requester
FOI 2022 166
Thank you for your information request received by us on 7 March 2022.
This request has been handled under the Freedom of...
Dear Mr Staples,
Further to your FOI request below I am advised as follows:-
1. Please provide a list of all datasets you have published in...
Dear Mr Staples,
On behalf of the Council, please accept my apology for the fact that we
did not respond to your request.
However, any inf...
This person's 49 annotations
Of course it does - see listed at page 5 of https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/434202/carter-interim-report.pdf...
They have not said this request is vexatious, just future ones, so you should ask for an internal review. The response is defective as even if they ar...
Ineffective response by the Council. They have failed even to show what information they hold within scope. They have failed to identify this as EIR. (...
A couple of points:
"The fact that the PHSO's response email got to me is neither here nor there. "
Actually it is, since it means they have met the...
"To apply a fee below FOI thresholds would devalue the EIR and is not the intention of the act."
Unfortunately the Tribunal has confirmed many times t...
I do not think I can add anything to my views on the legal situation. But you may like to consider if PHSO is adhering to his own values : http://bit.l...
If have said not to use a particular email address, then yes, any subsequent use of the address is a possible breach of DP principle 1. That does not h...
Requester.
You cannot base this on FOI Fees Regs. Almost certainly falls under EIR and they can make a 'reasonable charge'.
They have however failed...
Ganesh
fs_50276715 did not consider the point under discussion and says no more than that the authority SHOULD use the address provided under s8, not t...
Oops. Mea culpa. I thought we were still on the original request. Legal points still valid though and I still do not think an FOI request is the right...
I think Jonathan and Jt Oakley have misunderstood my point.
The general position is clear. If authority supplies info to given WDTK address he as comp...
On s21 applicant would also have to overcome decisions such as FS 50284087 (http://tinyurl.com/pc6uvl9) esp at paras 41-42 : "How easy or difficult it...
Yes - typo. I meant 1(1)(b).
The problem as I see it is that no matter how expansively one interprets s11, where the requester actually admits that he...
Unfortunately logic may have little to do with it - as is often the case with the law.
I think everyone agrees that an authority SHOULD respond to the...
Also note first three items in each case will technically be exempt under s22 FOIA as death certificates are public documents. Not sure if police would...
It may be simply that they are using a standard ACPO template for an internal referral to their own central foi unit - although it's not clear why they...
What about s8(1)(b) ? Does the Act imply that the response should be to the "address for correspondence"? Since such an address is required for a valid...
Well ... it is now.
That was actually the point of my request. Not sure it was strictly reasonably accessible as s21(3) excludes information I have...
Apologies for aberrant spell checker - that should read City of York ...
The legally correct answer to this question is yes. It is published annually by the Council as part of the Council Tax process and consists of the Coun...
Applicant is clearly a Daily Mail reader and has not yet realised that when DM says things like ": "The call for everyone to be implanted is now being...
Correction - they are registered as a data controller as CARDIFF CITY TRANSPORT SERVICES LTD but have apparently not complied with s16(1)(ff) of the da...
Andrew
Council is not saying that such communications do not exist - response is neutral on that - but that if they do they are not held by the Counc...
Of course they can provide it electronically. They have accepted it can be photocopied - the same machine will be able to scan and create an image whic...
Now that is a decent request
