This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 33)
The request was refused with what I consider to be inadequate justification. Under normal circumstances I would have immediately asked for an internal...
The request was refused with what I consider to be inadequate justification. Under normal circumstances I would have immediately asked for an internal...
This response is as unsatisfactory as the last in that whilst they claim to have target times for responses, they do not monitor against them and there...
Thank you for this. Assuming that the sign has been located on the 'path side' rather than on the 'entry side', then this makes sense and is now cons...
Thank you for the reply with excatly the information requested and within the statutory time frame.
Yours sincerely,
N.Siddle
N.Siddle -
Please find attached the response to your request for information.
Kind regards.
Compliance & Customer Relations Team,
Cheshire East Coun...
This answer addresses (at last) most of the specific questions originally asked (and has proven again just how careful one has to be in phrasing the or...
This response is pretty well what I expected. Vale Royal (VR) CCG have answered in respect to their own involvement in a straightforward and accurate m...
The public have a right to know why this contract was awarded to East Cheshire NHS instead of an award winning service based at the Countess of Chester...
Time has moved on, the Council has changed hands, and the topic - whilst never satisfactorily addressed by the Council - is really no longer relevant i...
Dear N Siddle,
Freedom of Information (ref T12705)
Thank you for your recent request. Please see below and attached document
for the infor...
Dear Mr Siddle
I re-sent it almost immediately with the attachment.
Ruth Winson
Dear Mr Siddle
Further to your request for an Internal Review, reference 2892021, of 27 May and 23 June 2015.
A review will be arranged and you will...
FAO Michelle du Bock
Thank you for this response which at last (a) explains to my satisfaction what went wrong and (b) reassures me that the underlyin...
Dear Mr Siddle
don't let the buggers grind you down sir !
Robert A Pickthall
Well they have now admitted that they were overdue on this one, but provide no explanation as to why there was this delay. There response to such a sim...
In other words.....some 7% of all journeys are made by Council Staff who do not pay for the privilege and for whom it is not even counted as a 'taxable...
It seems quite remarkable that the (presumably) latest survey was done in 2010 - although I am aware that there is one underway at present in advance o...
as per my FOI to the ICO, the response is disappointing if not surprising. They adopting the same 'we know best' response and refuse to divulge the cri...
On a technical point, I think the ICO has mis-applied the exemption they claim allows them to avoid having to confirm or deny whether or not they hold...
Mr/Mrs/Ms Siddell
well done your efforts will have helped many people such as myself who's right to information is constantly abused by this despicabl...
You must ask to see the title deeds to the land. My bet is there are likely reasons pertaining to the land which cause Mr David P Finlay and colleagues...
How can they not tell you if the company is still trading? This must have been an important consideration when they decided not to disclose the name o...
Thank you for this response. I appreciate that this is probably as much information as is reasonably to hand. It does, however, concern me that the '...
Response provided on the last allowable day. Declined under data protection to name the person involved in 'calling-in' the application. There was no c...
This person's 105 annotations
I am no tax or employment lawyer, but this answer appears to be fundamentally flawed. The clue is in the term “taxable BENEFIT” – not ‘taxable COST’....
I will be interested to see what response you get and whether it is the same as the one given to me previously by the previous administration, ie "Tick...
The email address will have been removed by WhatdotheyKnow rather than not provided by the Council- see their note if you try clicking on the removed a...
The request was refused with what I consider to be inadequate justification. Under normal circumstances I would have immediately asked for an internal...
The request was refused with what I consider to be inadequate justification. Under normal circumstances I would have immediately asked for an internal...
This response is as unsatisfactory as the last in that whilst they claim to have target times for responses, they do not monitor against them and there...
There are words for this response - but none are postable here!:-
1. A target of 10 days is claimed which is reasonable. But if it is not monitored,...
CWaC, whilst admitting their error(s), really haven't given a satisfactory explanation. Given that we know (from the Court cases) that this firm had se...
This seems an extraordinary response in that it appears to imply that the Council have been corresponding with a company through a personal address rat...
I suspect that CWaC may have difficulty with your request on the grounds that it is not very specific. If, as I suspect, you want the list of those whi...
Methinks that you have approached the wrong authority. Cheshire West & Chester is in the UK - not in Washington State iin the US
I assume that all the procedings against Mr Pickthall have now concluded? Or perhaps there is still some challenge working its way through the system?...
This answer is not only not in comprehensible English ("Therefore your request is not considered to be a valid request
under the Freedom of Informatio...
This answer addresses (at last) most of the specific questions originally asked (and has proven again just how careful one has to be in phrasing the or...
You might want to ask them to identify, if they can, the numbers let out to students and the numbers occupied by non-students. They may or may not have...
This withdrawal of the redaction of the officer's name is a very minor concession and really does not help us to understand how this contract came to b...
This response is pretty well what I expected. Vale Royal (VR) CCG have answered in respect to their own involvement in a straightforward and accurate m...
Yet again, CWaCC are using spurious ‘confidentiality’ excuses to deny provision of the information. It is also clear from their latest response that th...
Yet again, CWaCC are using spurious ‘confidentiality’ excuses to deny provision of the information. It is also clear from their latest response that th...
Time has moved on, the Council has changed hands, and the topic - whilst never satisfactorily addressed by the Council - is really no longer relevant i...
I am still awaiting word from the ICO
Given that CWaCC has chosen to close all complaints associated with the Sexual Health contract award without providing satisfactory answers, I have bun...
Given the 'nil' response to my request as to to whom I should complain, I referred this and my other Sexual Health FOI to the ICO. I have now heard bac...
I think that you will find that CWaCC will take the full 20 days before advising you (quite correctly) that they are not able to answer the question du...
Darren
It is on the site, but logged under the original enquiry 'Sexual Health Contract for CWACC' at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/sexual_he...