This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 85)
Thank you for the information provided. With regard to the 'commercial interests' exemption presented, coincidentally, the day after your email, a T...
It is your error, not mine that has led to confusion and it appears there remains an intention not to act upon those items that fall within the cost....
when presenting the clarification I have sought, please see a Tribunal Decision of 02/12/2018 here:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/area-10-bbmm-c...
Dear Mr swift,
Thank you for your email.
I can confirm that your request for a formal review has been recorded and that the response will be issued b...
Please advise by when I am to receive the information I have requested and why I have neither update nor data. You are in breach of the Act.
Your...
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Surrey Police's handl...
Please advise by when I am to receive the information I have requested and why I have neither update nor data. You are in breach of the Act.
Your...
to ICO 27/11/2018.
this should be read in conjunction with:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeratio...
Dear Mr Swift
Please find attached the additional information that was requested.
Regards
Lynn Wyeth
Head of Information Governance & Ri...
Dear Mr Swift,
The information provided is that which is held by Kent Police in terms of automatically calculated fraud statistics. As explained withi...
Dear Mr Swift
Freedom of Information Review Reference No: 2018110000008
Further to our earlier correspondence dated 01/11/2018, I am now able to
p...
You need to ask them why they are not monitoring their contractors. Kier's charge rates are the same in London and elsewhere. It seems TfL have agree...
Dear Mr. Swift,
I write in response to your below email of 15th October and have addressed your queries below:
1. Is (or was) it Balfour Beatty (or...
thank you
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
FoI/2018/1119
Dear Mr Swift,
Request for information: Correspondence relating to FOI/2018/1013
Please see below the Council’s respons...
Dear Mr Swift
I acknowledge receipt of your request for an internal review of our response.
Regards
Sarah Daffern
Audit & Governance
Governance & L...
to the reader:
I suspect this will go the way of:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/contractor_lumpsum_tp_charges#outgoing-830196
my response b...
I took the time, on the 1st approach from Mr Hill, to comprehensively present the outstanding issues. These were treated dismissively and as yet hav...
Dear Mr Swift
Thank you for your email.
We had two requests from you in October 2017 that asked for similar information. You asked for an internal re...
Thank you for your email.
If you have submitted a Freedom of Information request, please be aware
that we can accept requests via our on-line web-fo...
Dear P Swift
Please find attached Southampton City Council’s response to your Freedom
of Information request.
Kind regards
Gurpreet...
thank you, I note: the MoJ holds the information and has supplied the Account title & Deposit date:
Tower Transit Operations Ltd
27/06/2013
Aut...
thank you for your reply. I have directed my request to Leicester City Council
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
thank you
Yours sincerely,
Mr P Swift
Dear Mr Swift,
Please be aware that we will be unable to process your two latest
requests, which are a split of the request processed under case...
This person's 180 annotations
The following may be of assistance. Did you place your 2017 request with the ICO?
There appears less reason to decline your request now as the ‘inves...
you asked:
the contractor says that you are aware they have a dual pricing process. they charge you a lower rate than others. they have agreed a base...
25/09/2017 HE wrote: I refer to your request dated 5 September for an internal review with regards to 'Pricing Methodologies'
I note that you have su...
Thank you for your freedom of information request of 16 November 2016. In your email
of 16 November you requested:
The contracts and agreed rates bet...
re: 4. You replied the release of all labour, plant and equipment rates, is considered commercially sensitive and inappropriate, particularly given tha...
Rates are not commercially sensitive. Tribunal Decision EA/2018/0104 ICO 02/04/2018.
you need to ask for the DCP Rates.
see:
http://www.englandhi...
Rates are not commercially sensitive. Tribunal Decision EA/2018/0104 ICO 02/04/2018.
you need to ask for the DCP Rates.
see:
http://www.englandhi...
defined costs have been supplied to others
TP claims overhead have been supplied to others
The defined costs are NOT commercially sensitive
Howeve...
you may wish to revisit this:
It appears HE are not auditing their contractor (Area 9 for example) as if they did they would be aware that the contra...
you have asked for the difference in contracts. If you want to see the difference in rates, they are NOT commercially sensitive. This may provide yo...
Rates are not commercially sensitive. Tribunal Decision EA/2018/0104 ICO 02/04/2018.
you need to ask for the DCP Rates.
see:
http://www.englandhi...
see: http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/area-10-bbmm-charging/
I sought ‘DCP Rates’[1]
HE described these as ‘commercially sensitive’
I appealed
HE...
Rates are not commercially sensitive. Tribunal Decision EA/2018/0104 ICO 02/04/2018.
you need to ask for the DCP Rates.
see:
http://www.englandhigh...
Sir
1. the ASC is prescriptive - see Appendix A to Annex 23
2. Rates are not commercially sensitive. Tribunal Decision EA/2018/0104 ICO 02/04/2018....
this relates to the claim made against you:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeration/
you (anyone w...
to ICO 27/11/2018.
this should be read in conjunction with:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeratio...
the following may be of interest as it addresses the ability to compare information and undermines Highways England's response:
10/05/2018, having not...
you may wish to view:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeration/
you may wish to view:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeration/
please see:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeration/
Please see the information and linked pages at:
http://www.englandhighways.co.uk/kier-highways-alert-systematic-state-enabled-exaggeration/
Response:
We have completed our search for the information and a copy of it is shown below.
1. How much are you charged for a TM Programmer and why...
I note your appeal was successful. Do you possess any correspondence relating to this, any information resulting form the process that ultimately foun...
fyi ... further to my pm's on this matter the TP claims overhead for Area 9 has now been published and is 25.29%. Re the make-up of this, in light of...
The Council's response states:
Wherever possible, in accordance with the council’s review procedure, the review
will be dealt with by an officer who...