This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 7)
How can the ICO, as a publicly funded body, not have a receipt or record of what they have paid for these jackets?
Dear Mr Ormerod
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2012120002125
I respond in connection with your request for information which was
rec...
Dear Mr Omerod
I refer to your e-mail sent on 15 June 2009 and enclose the Recruitment
and Selection Policy for your information. I apologise for not...
Dear Sharron,
Many thanks for that, much appreciated.
By the way, of the three options, you definitely picked the best logo design!!
Yours sincer...
Dear Sir or Madam,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Ast...
Dear Mr Ormerod
Sorry to offend
fred robinson
Dear Mr Ormerod
While the sight of graphic footage may be upsetting, conflicts in battle zones do produce such footage and a sensitive viewers should...
This person's 59 annotations
"If you are dyslexic you should not be telling me what to do as you haven't a clue what democracy is"
What? How insulting.
I note this in the acknowledgement:
"...if any of the exception categories apply then the information will not be released"
I find that either wron...
Actually, sorry to be pedantic, but I beg to differ further! If the request was received on 20th April, the deadline would be 19th May, not the 18th....
For crying out loud Fred, it was an automated response. Why do you persist in responding to automatically-generated emails as if they are specific res...
Can somebody please point out where, exactly, the ICO's publication scheme is, as I've been unable to find it, either via their sitemap, their site A-Z...
Is that because it's going to take you 10 days to compose another 23,000 word essay?
It was answered a long time ago (14th November), when they said:
"...As a consequence Ordnance Survey employees
must comply with the requirements of...
Oh my lord. Since the 3rd January you have emailed them a total of over 23,000 words - don't worry, I didn't count them, I copied and pasted into Micr...
I know it's not as clear cut as the DPA example - which is why I said it's a "bit" like that.
Whilst it's based on BBC opinion (and an often (usually...
Previous post should have said it *WASN'T* 'available elsewhere'
Firstly, the info was disclosed to me by somebody at Aston University, other by using this site. It was 'available elsewhere'.
Further, even if it w...
Don't worry Fred - I got the information elsewhere, about 2 weeks ago.
This is totally unacceptable. I would be referring this matter to the ICO without delay.
I think the BBC have failed to realise that any message from the applicant expressing dissatisfaction at how their request has been handled should be t...
If information isn't covered by the Act, then the Act doesn't apply, hence no internal review.
All you can do is refer the matter to the ICO for him...
Oh my god, a crack in Fred's wall is the cause of all this FOI mayhem???
Get a plasterer in Fred, job done.
I continue to note your ongoing total misunderstanding of FOI, your continued harrassment of a number of public authorities, your continued habit of se...
Fred, why do you persist in posting replies to automatically-generated notification emails? It can only be to cause annoyance.
"The Prime Minister has asked me to write to you...." is just a polite way of saying 'my job description includes replying to letters to the PM with th...
LOL!! 'Moderation'???? That's something I think you could do with applying to your FOI approaches.
pot/kettle/black, etc. etc.
Oh lordy! You think I' a government mole!!! That's literally hilarious!
In my humble opinion I DID assist Fred. He clearly misunderstood the ICO's...
Oh for the love of God, Fred!!!
You asked the National Archives:
"Will you confirm or deny that it is an offence for the Land Registry to use the wor...
My intent, as you will see from many annotations of Fred's requests, is trying to get him to understand what FOI is about, as he clearly struggles with...
And yes, you were asking about Section 14 of the Act, as that is the section regarding vexatious requests.
