This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 35)
This request is the subject of ICO decision notice FS50285730:
"The Commissioner considers that the public authority applied section 14 appropriately...
Dear M Stafford
I note that you requested a review of the way your request was handled in June 2009. At that time we wrote back to you with a copy of...
These issues are discussed here
http://maire-staffordshire.blogspot.com/2010/06/feels-like-old-times.html
A request for internal review has been sent to Mr A Partridge by email.
It included this letter as an annex: http://maire-staffordshire.blogspot.c...
A request for internal review has been sent to Mr A Partridge by email.
It included this letter as an annex: http://maire-staffordshire.blogspot.c...
Dear Department for Children, Schools and Families,
A request for internal review has been sent to Mr A Partridge by email.
It included this let...
A request for internal review has been sent to Mr A Partridge by email.
It included this letter as an annex: http://maire-staffordshire.blogspot.c...
This is an open case with the Information Commissioner.
Maire i have only just come to compare this response with the supplemental questionnaire and it is now evident that they only gave information for 4.8%...
Ooops, blink and you'd miss it (like I did) Thank You Tania.
Lou Thorn
Thank you that answers my question, i fear you are mistaken however about a previous response, there is no response on 22nd September.
Yours since...
Our reference 000643/09
Dear Sir or Madam
Freedom of Information Act 2000
Information Request - Suitability of Education in the EHE Populatio...
Thank you for the information. I am very surprised to see the parent not cooperating with monitoring row. Perhaps you are unaware of the law and g...
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you for your request for information, which was received on 30
September. You asked if any company connected to Graham Badman wa...
Thank you for the clarification.
Yours sincerely,
M Stafford
M Stafford
<<ContactAddress>>
[FOI #16076 email]
10/09/2009
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 - INFORMATION REQUEST
FOI Request Numbe...
Thank you for your email.
I am out of the office until Friday 11th September
If you have an urgent query please contact x8020, and another member of...
Thank you very much for the information.
Yours sincerely,
M Stafford
Thank you very much for the information.
Yours sincerely,
M Stafford
Thank you for the information.
Yours sincerely,
M Stafford
Thank you for your response.
Yours sincerely,
M Stafford
Thank you for supplying the information.
Yours faithfully,
M Stafford
Dear M Stafford
Please find attached, response to your above request.
Regards
Corporate Information Governance
Tel: 0116 252 7666
Please ask for: D...
Thank you for the information.
Yours sincerely,
M Stafford
Thank you very much for providing this information.
Yours faithfully,
M Stafford
This person's 70 annotations
These issues are discussed here
http://maire-staffordshire.blogspot.com/2010/06/feels-like-old-times.html
It is looking like these two spreadsheets are all the evidence held.
http://spreadsheets3.google.com/ccc?key=tODq3S-6y3CvLb3KmltDRKQ&hl=en#gid=0
http...
It is beyond my understanding how seeking the truth could be seen to vilify anyone!
This is an open case with the Information Commissioner.
This is an open case with the Information Commissioner.
I wouldn't have believed this if I hadn't seen it, not one LA capable or reading and understanding a simple clear question.
Another one that can't understand a simple question, never mind the fact that our children are not pupils nor pawns to protect their reputation and car...
It is unbelievable how incompetent these local authorities are, has even one read and understood your question yet?
Four months to say no, such respect for it's masters the DCSF have, not!
It is pretty obvious why K Maxwell could not find it though as the annex was posted after the statement that it was not there, as indeed it was not.
I would take you complaint higher asap and also refer this to the information commissioner.
They seem to think this means a telephone call.
May be missing something but can't find the answer there.
How can policy legitimately be made on the recommendations of a review still in the consultation stage that may never be implemented?
Thanks Mrs.J.E.Garrett, I did wonder, better safe than sorry.
You have had your work cut following these up Tania, a pity so many public servants seem to be at ease breaking the law.
My suspicion is that it is that awkward word evidence that is giving them the problem.
They are doing this regularly now, still not realised we are not stupid.
I would refer this to the information commissioner, they have taken three months to reply which is 3 times as long as it should have taken and I am not...
I would also refer to the information commissioner as I think reasons for refusal may be suspect and would not stand up to scrutiny.
We need to know where these scraps of documents come from.
I would refer this straight to the information commissioner. I do not see how they can say the data would harm people when SCRs are put in the public d...
They have had more than enough time to conduct an internal review on this, I would refer it to the information commissioner.
Not even an acknowledgement, how rude.
I feel it is highly unusual to treat a request for clarification as a new Foi and would hope that this does not take 20 more days.