This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 84)
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Your requested internal review of FOI-1499999 is now complete. Please see
the attached letter for the outcome.
Yours sincerely,...
FOI 24/089
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Thank you for your request of 27 January 2024 under the Freedom of Information Act. You requested:
Please will you prov...
With ICO as the answer provided is directly contradicted by other documents provided by another authority
Freedom of Information Request Revised Response
Our Ref: FOI-2303-1934485
ICO Ref: IC-231102-T9M7
Dear Louise Bicknell,
We write further to your...
Referred to the ICO as I do not consider these FOIAs vexatious, in fact DHSC has mischaracterised these to avoid answering these key questions
This is subject to internal review. DHSC has amalgamated this with the “Shielded persons, the shielded persons list and the use of prophylaxis for COV...
This is subject to internal review. DHSC has amalgamated this with the “Shielded persons, the shielded persons list and the use of prophylaxis for COV...
In respect of the redaction of names the ICO ruled that while there was a legitimate interest in disclosure they did not consider such disclosure was n...
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Please find attached the Department of Health and Social Care's response
to your recent FOI request (our ref: FOI-1449046).
Your...
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Your requested internal review of FOI-1442668 is now complete.
With apologies for the delay, please see the attached letter for t...
Freedom of Information Internal Review outcome
Our Ref: FOI-2211-1870162
ICO Ref: IC-240304-T6P5
Dear Louise Bicknell,
We write further to your...
Further to my earlier annotation. Reviewing the second link provided in answer to question 6, this is for health professionals and does contain the in...
See response to FOIA Therapeutics Clinical Review Panel Meetings and minutes submitted on 13 February 2023 . DHSC provided this information on 12 July...
This is with the ICO for review
Dear Louise Bicknell,
Thank you for your email of 12 June 2023 in which you requested
information under the FOI Act from NHS England.
Your request...
After the involvement of the ICO the DHSC have now confirmed that there were no meetings within the timeframe
ICO has confirmed that they are taking this (and the related cases) forward
Dear Louise Bicknell,
Please find attached the UK Health Security Agency's response to your
request.
Yours sincerely,
Information Rights...
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Your requested internal review of FOI-1440905 is now complete. Please see
the attached letter for the outcome.
Yours sincerely,...
Dear Louise Bicknell,
Please find attached the UK Health Security Agency's response to your
request.
Yours sincerely,
Information Rights...
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Your requested internal review of FOI-1437593 is now complete. Please see
the attached letter for the outcome.
Once again, pleas...
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Please find attached the Department of Health and Social Care's response
to your recent FOI request (our ref: FOI-1440831).
Your...
Dear Ms Bicknell,
Your requested internal review of FOI-1429069 is now complete. Please see
the attached letter for the outcome.
Yours sincerely,...
Dear Louise Bicknell,
Please find attached the UK Health Security Agency's response to your
request.
Yours sincerely,
Information Rights Team
P...
I view of the time elapsed and the answers being provided promptly by other CMDUs to these questions I decided not to follow up. A lesson for the futu...
This person's 55 annotations
With ICO as the answer provided is directly contradicted by other documents provided by another authority
Referred to the ICO as I do not consider these FOIAs vexatious, in fact DHSC has mischaracterised these to avoid answering these key questions
This is subject to internal review. DHSC has amalgamated this with the “Shielded persons, the shielded persons list and the use of prophylaxis for COV...
This is subject to internal review. DHSC has amalgamated this with the “Shielded persons, the shielded persons list and the use of prophylaxis for COV...
In respect of the redaction of names the ICO ruled that while there was a legitimate interest in disclosure they did not consider such disclosure was n...
Referred to ICO for failure to respond 3/9/23
Further to my earlier annotation. Reviewing the second link provided in answer to question 6, this is for health professionals and does contain the in...
While we have the answers, their webpage to which they refer does not contain any of the information, so people in this position and GPs (including min...
See response to FOIA Therapeutics Clinical Review Panel Meetings and minutes submitted on 13 February 2023 . DHSC provided this information on 12 July...
This is with the ICO for review
Two are now answered. Three are still outstanding an answer. DHSC has said they are working on this and will revert as a priority
If no answer i wil...
After the involvement of the ICO the DHSC have now confirmed that there were no meetings within the timeframe
After the involvement of the ICO the DHSC have confirmed on 30 June that there were no meetings after this date
ICO has confirmed that they are taking this (and the related cases) forward
ICO advised to give 40 working days for NHSE to reply to internal review. This has now passed, so sent again to the ICO requesting that they follow up...
Referred to the ICO for failure to answer internal review request
Referred to ICO for failure to respond to request for internal review
To be referred to the ICO
To be referred to the ICO
ICO issued decision notice on 6 February for failure to respond within the statutory time limit. Gave 35 working days to reply. Information still out...
I view of the time elapsed and the answers being provided promptly by other CMDUs to these questions I decided not to follow up. A lesson for the futu...
Matter is with the ICO to determine as relevant information has been totally redacted and not provided on time
ICO required a response. This was received on 8 February. As detailed above parts were missing. Requested internal review on 11 February 2023
28/12/22
Sent to ICO for failure to respond to their response request