This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 119)
Dear Mr Hudson
Thank you for your email.
Please note that the Unmanned Aircraft (UA) definition covers the term drone.
Kind regards
Gary Burke
Shar...
There are still a few sentences entirely removed under Section 24(1) National Security, which are likely related to counter drone assets despite the fa...
Thank you for your email which has today been received by Cumbria
Constabulary.
If your message relates to a request for information under the F...
The ICO reference is: IC-193121-Z5F4
The ICO made the point in considering the case:
"The Commissioner notes the complainant has stated this inform...
Dear Mr Hudson
Thank you for your email which was received by the Air Accidents
Investigation Branch (AAIB) on Sunday 19^th February 2023. The A...
Dear Mr Hudson,
Freedom of Information Act 2000 Request - ref 10336
Please see the attached revised response to your Freedom of Information...
*** Please ensure that you read in full the important notes below before
reviewing this response. ***
Let us know how we did today – cli...
Good afternoon,
I hope this finds you well.
As part of our on-going performance monitoring, Oadby and Wigston Borough
Council would like t...
Dear Mr Hudson,
The Department has a central FOI Operations team which assigns requests for recorded information to the most appropriate business area...
So many things that do not add up.
Dear I Hudson,
Please refer to the attached letter.
Regards,
Ivan Pocock
[1][IMG] Ivan Pocock
Information Rights Adviser,...
Dear I Hudson
Thank you for your email.
Further information in regards to your query can be found on our website.
[1]Victim service assess...
Dear Ian Hudson
I refer to your request dated 3 August 2022 under the Freedom of
Information Act asking to supply the following information:
...
Official
[1]www.met.police.uk
Your ref:
Our ref: 01/FOI/22/025775
25/08/2022
Dear I Hudson,
Fr...
Official
[1]www.met.police.uk
Your ref:
Our ref: 01/FOI/22/025772
17/08/2022
Dear I Hudson
...
Dear Linda,
The email reply is fine, a letter format is totally unnecessary.
Thank you for the quick reply, it's appreciated.
Yours sincerely,...
Dear requester,
Please find attached the response to your Freedom of Information request
dated 30/06/2022
Regards
Steve
Steven...
Official
Information Rights Unit
PO Box 313
Sidcup
DA15 0HH
Email: [1][The Met request email]
[2]www.met.police.uk
You...
Thank you for emailing Incommunities. We are currently closed, if your
query is with regard to an emergency repair please contact us on 0330 175
9540...
Dear Future of Flight,
Thank you for the reply to F0021155 which answered all my questions.
Yours sincerely,
I Hudson
Dear FOI Requests,
This is a thank you for the clarification you sent for F0005723, that cleared up my understanding of the point being made.
Yours...
17 June 2022
Case Reference: IC-173849-N5B0
Dear Ian Hudson
Thank you for your email of 17 June 2022.
The comments you make have been noted...
This person's 38 annotations
There are still a few sentences entirely removed under Section 24(1) National Security, which are likely related to counter drone assets despite the fa...
Row 25 column E reveals that the Home Secretary approved the use of effectors at Gatwick (which the MOD in e-mails had repeatedly warned against). Nig...
The included jpg photo/screenshot is 739 x 1600 pixels.
The included MP4 video is 848 x 480, so the video is low quality.
Given mobile phones don't...
The video, from a mobile phone is struggling to focus on the drone. Zoomed in 8x and played frame by frame (also apparent in the still jpg included he...
The ICO reference is: IC-193121-Z5F4
The ICO made the point in considering the case:
"The Commissioner notes the complainant has stated this inform...
FOIA F0018764 (October 2020) provided e-mails sent to Dan after he'd ceased employment with the DfT in December 2019, so archived e-mails then appear t...
ICO reference: IC-178838-H1S1
Following a continued refusal to answer the clarification of the internal review this FOIA has regrettably been escalated to the ICO.
I got a response but it was attached to the wrong request:
Request:
Recently in FOI: FOI REF 738/21 the alleged Gatwick drone is described as "a co...
ICO Case Reference: IC-146243-K7P5
This has not really been answered at all, as it was the attachments that were being sought and they've not been included under the excuse of national s...
I have escalated this matter to the ICO, as this body have oversight over Sussex Police and have refused repeatedly to answer if they are able to reque...
The last response to Merseyside Police mentions The Verge when the publication link included is to Wired. It was in fact Wired that was the source of...
Answered here: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/national_funding_for_operation_t
On 18 October 2021, the ICO communicated the following action to Merseyside Police:
If it is the case that you have not issued an internal review dec...