This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 218)
Our ref: FOI2024/27548
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
Thank you for your request, which was received on 14 March.
Please remember to quote the referenc...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
We are writing in response to your request for information, received 17
December.
Yours sincerely,
HMRC Freedom of Info...
You appear to be sending all requesters this boilerplate message:
"Before the Trust receives and processes your request, can you please confirm that...
Our ref: FOI2024/18038
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
Thank you for your request, which was received on 20 February.
Please remember to quote the refer...
Dear Ganesh,
Please find attached our response to your request for an internal review.
Kind regards,
Sabira Bukhari
Ganesh Sittampalam
[FOI #104...
Dear Ganesh,
I can confirm that the redaction of junior staff names does relate to
civil servants.
With regard to your other query, we do not agree...
Dear Ganesh,
Please find attached our response to your request for an internal review.
Kind regards,
Bryan Thomas
Ganesh Sittampalam
[email addr...
Hi Abigail,
That sounds good, thanks! I assume this must be written down *somewhere* as LNER isn't going to be spending hundreds of millions on train...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
We are writing in response to your request for information, received 13
September.
Yours sincerely,
HMRC Freedom of Inf...
Dear Ganesh,
Please see the attached letter regarding the outcome of our
reconsideration of FOI2023/01528.
Kind regards,
Sabira Bukhari
Ganesh...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam
Freedom of Information Act request response – Ref 2127322
Cambridgeshire County Council has now considered your request under...
Bit silly that the council has redacted the name of the school but no big deal in practice.
They apparently promised action within a "week or so" fro...
Dear Sir/Madam
Please find attached the response from Rutland County Council to your FOI
Request.
Regards
Freedom of Information...
Dear Ganesh,
Please find attached our response to your request for an internal review.
Please accept our apologies for the delay in providing you w...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
Please find attached the LGA’s response to your recent Freedom of
Information Act request.
Kind regards,
Bh...
Our Ref: 2023.02.05
Date: 10^th March 2023
Internal Review carried out under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
(“FOIA”) and Freedom of I...
Classification: CONFIDENTIAL
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
Please see the attached response to your request for an internal review.
Kind r...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
Please see the attached response to your request (our reference 221223010
)
Knowledge and Information Officer...
Apologies, this request is a duplicate, please ignore it and respond to the first copy.
Yours faithfully,
Ganesh Sittampalam
The ICO's reply is indeed very useful, whereas I have learnt precisely nothing from any of yours other than that you still like randomly abusing people...
The correspondence in ICO Case number IC-151797-N3Z4 referenced above, which is where the internal review response was given, can be found at https://w...
Dear Daniel Scannell,
Thank for the data. The extra delay is totally fine under the circumstances, I just wasn't sure what was happening.
I will wr...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
I am writing to you in response to your request for a review into the
handling of your request. I can see that your ini...
I'm still finding their reasoning quite hard to follow, but as far as I can make out:
- They've been told by the DfT to ignore noise impacts below a...
Dear Ganesh Sittampalam,
Please see the attached.
Yours sincerely,
BBC Information Rights Legal
First Floor
Wogan House
99 Great Portland S...
This person's 791 annotations
Another copy of this request was made at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/annual_colonial_reports_gold_coa_2 and got a "not held" response.
Bit silly that the council has redacted the name of the school but no big deal in practice.
They apparently promised action within a "week or so" fro...
If you don't want to read the text of the act, look at the ICO's guidance:
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/foi-eir-and-access-to-information/fre...
Zak: Please read s17 of the FOI act carefully :-)
Follow up request as of today: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/open_banking
The ICO's reply is indeed very useful, whereas I have learnt precisely nothing from any of yours other than that you still like randomly abusing people...
I would have expected that someone who was genuinely trying to make a helpful point would approach the discussion in a rather less confrontational way,...
It's a bit hard to tell if you're actually trying to be constructive or just your usual grandstanding.
But on the assumption it's the former, that wa...
Err, yes, I do expect the ICO to be able to figure out what contains personal data. But if your argument is actually correct I'm sure the ICO will be a...
I don't think it's particularly well defined exactly how a request can come to be declared as oppressive.
It's obvious why the case law says that s14...
The data released isn't completely consistent with the BBC report. That referred to 45 samples, of which 25 contained PFASs and 4 exceeding 10ng/l. The...
I'm still finding their reasoning quite hard to follow, but as far as I can make out:
- They've been told by the DfT to ignore noise impacts below a...
This request was prompted by the FOS being 41 days late with a SAR for me. They told me that "Unfortunately, your request has come to us at a busy time...
I guess escalating this to the ICO is pointless, as it's unlikely the FOI officer is actually lying about what they hold. The question is what led to t...
Seems the tweet has now been deleted. I'm glad I copied the text into the request.
Looks like it's just been published here: https://github.com/mrc-ide/covid-sim
I wonder if they're actually doing anything about this, apart from sending out emails every 2 weeks!
A copy of the response to this request is at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/415666/response/1014874/attach/2/R12802.pdf , password 'request-415...
A copy of the response to this request is at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/415666/response/1014874/attach/2/R12802.pdf , password 'request-415...
A copy of the response to this request is at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/415666/response/1014874/attach/2/R12802.pdf , password 'request-415...
A copy of the response to this request is at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/415666/response/1014874/attach/2/R12802.pdf , password 'request-415...
A copy of the response to this request is at https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/415666/response/1014874/attach/2/R12802.pdf , password 'request-415...
The password for the PDF is 'request-415666-7df47314@whatdotheyknow.com' (the request is now blocked from receiving further emails).
Will you be appealing to the ICO?
SICO decision: http://www.itspublicknowledge.info/uploadedFiles/Decision113-2016.pdf