This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 25)
Please find attached the reply to your recent internal review request
Regards
FOI Team
1 Horse Guards Road
London
SW1A 2H...
<<FOI91426 internal review.doc>>
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see the attached, in relation to FOI91426.
Regards,
Nick
Nicholas Allen
National I...
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please find attached MOD’s internal review response to your request, our
reference: 15-10-2013-142720-009, with apologies for...
Dear Mr MacKenzie,
Please see attached MOD's Internal Review response to your request, our
reference 26-11-2012-130010-010.
Regards,
Ms Usha Sondhi
-...
Dear Mr Mackenzie
The Department has no statutory obligation under the Act to pursue
informal resolution where it is not practicable to do so. A...
Dear Mr Mackenzie
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: 2013050002903
I respond in connection with your request for information which was...
GPMS Classification: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Good morning Mr MacKenzie
Please find attached response to your request for a revised review as noted...
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached for the internal review of your Freedom of Information
Request.
MOD Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached for the internal review of your Freedom of Information
Request.
MOD Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Pleas see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached,
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Yours sincerely,
FOI Internal Review Team
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached for the internal review of your request for
information 01-10-2012-094532-003,
Yours sincerely,
F...
Dear Mr Tranham,
Thank you for your most thorough response pointing out a number of facts and ruling that the undisclosed information be released....
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Dear Mr McKenzie,
Please find attached the response to your review request.
If you have questions about the respo...
NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED
Good afternoon
Please find attached response.
Kind regards, Nicola
_________________________________________________
Ni...
Dear Betts-Gray, Mary,
Thank you for providing that clarity.
Yours sincerely,
Donnie Mackenzie
Dear Mr Ironside,
Thanks for clearing that up.
Yours sincerely,
Donnie Mackenzie
Dear Mr Mackenzie,
Please see attached.
Regards
Ron Harney
Data Protection Officer & Freedom of Information Manager
MDPGA Sec...
Dear _Enquiries,
Thank you for your prompt and thorough response.
Yours sincerely,
Donnie Mackenzie
This person's 23 annotations
22nd April 2014 Decision Notice. MOJ asked to respond.
http://ico.org.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2014/fs_50530136.ashx
With regard to the request for clarification they claimed was vexatious, the ICO has ruled in my favour against that. MOD have been told to issue a res...
*Date correction, original request was 10th October.
DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY ICO. Response directed within 35 calendar days.(29th Jan)
DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY ICO. Response directed within 35 calendar days.(29th Jan)
DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY ICO. Response directed within 35 calendar days.(29th Jan)
DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY ICO. Response directed within 35 calendar days.(29th Jan)
DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY ICO. Response directed within 35 calendar days.(29th Jan)
DECISION NOTICE ISSUED BY ICO. Response directed within 35 calendar days.(29th Jan)
http://www.channel4.com/news/military-justice-criminal-conviction-raf-tom-deacon
Well if/when they do get an external independent body, it will hopef...
Front page story on The Times (Scot Edition anyway) today about the need for the Army and other armed forces to open up their justice system.....
COPY OF CORRESPONDANCE FROM MOD WHICH WAS POSTED IN SEPARATE LINK BUT PERTAINS TO THIS FOLLOWS (http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/mod_purchase_info...
* Above text should say 'as was specified'
I should add that the term 'payload' was mistakenly used for non space related devices; and that you should not rule out anything on this basis.
In particular I would like the content of the emails, the departments,senders and the date.
Thanks again.
COPY OF EMAIL TO WHATDOTHEYKNOW.COM
On 06/11/2012 , Donnie Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> I just saw a response on this request:
ht...
Updated link to Cohort Annual Report
http://www.cohortplc.com/media/pdf/Cohort%20plc%20Annual%20Report%20and%20Accounts%202012.pdf
This is a duplicate which is from similar request. My apologies, actual response to follow shortly.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/mar/20/fbi-informant?INTCMP=SRCH
Manufacturing false audio recordings through editing is widely used in my beli...
Could you also tell me why the response you sent was categorised as 'Restricted' within the Government Protective Marking System when it seems you were...
Also could you let me know when Cranfield began training in Information Operations (formally or informally)?
If this dates back to the College of Ae...
Above should have read-'Within legal guidelines'