This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 90)
(page 3)
Re information request P0006386: thank you for your helpful response.
Ben Harris
Dear Mr Harris,
Please find attached the response to your request for information
received on 14 January 2010.
Regards,
Tamar Blackburn
ES Business...
Dear David Bennett,
Thank you for your swift and helpful response to my odd question about BRB. My curiosity is fully satisfied.
Yours sincerely,...
Part 3
The information in this em...
Because I suspect that the Council was right to refuse this request on the grounds of cost, I've made effectively the same request again rather waste t...
I will be out of the office until Monday 7 December.
Please contact Tamar Blackburn (715668) or Natasha Graham 715670 or email [email address]
T...
The Council still haven't removed the reference to a charge of £25/hr from their EIR Web page, so I've reminded them about it. If this doesn't help, I...
Thank you for the information about the cycling prohibition on Christ's Pieces. I'll drop a line to the WhatDoTheyKnow admins and see if they can work...
The Council have put this request on their Web site at
<http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/council/access/foi/FOI+requests+and+responses/may09/18.05.200...
The Council have also put this request on their Web site at <http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/council/access/foi/FOI+requests+and+responses/june09/16.0...
Thank you for your swift reply to my recent request for information about Ipswich Buses.
Ben Harris
Thank you for your email which has been forwarded to the FoI office for
response.
Kind regards
Customer Services
Swindon Borough Council
Wat Tyler...
I've got the order now: <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/f03.doc>
I've got the order now: <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/g13.doc>
Thank you for your very informative reply to my request for information about the former arrangements for making traffic regulation orders in Cambridge...
Exploration of Get-a-map suggests that of those, the only parts in the city of Cambridge are a small section of the M11 around junction 13 and the A14...
5. It must be remembered that the S.44 authorisation is a discloseable document and, as such, care must be taken not to include direct reference to mat...
The County Council have answered this request at <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_city_of_cambridge_area_g_con#incoming-41732>. It would app...
Paper copy posted today in good time for the last collection.
Thank you for your helpful response to my recent request for information, ref FOI 381185.
Ben Harris
Dear Ben
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST REFERENCE NO: 0369/09
In reply to your request for information under the Freedom of Information
Act 2000, rec...
Scans of the paper versions of the order and its amendments:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/aread.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/d01.pdf>
<http://bjh...
The scan of this order is at <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areae.pdf>.
I've now scanned the order and its amendments as held at Castle Court:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areac.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/c01.pdf>
<...
Scans of the amending orders:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/b01.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/b02.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/b03.pdf>
<http...
This person's 428 annotations
(page 3)
A response to this request was provided here:
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/hospital_areas_surveyed_by_cctv#incoming-260410>
Tier 4
Awaiting classification.
The address for response appears in a footer added to each outgoing message by WhatDoTheyKnow. It may be necessary to point this out to the College.
Matt Hupfield's annotation isn't quite correct in its statement of FOI law. The FOI Act grants a right of access to information to "any person":
<ht...
I scanned the copy of the order that I found in Castle Court, and here it is:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/a158.pdf>
The error message immediately above relates to the original outgoing message rather than the re-sent one, because nhs-pd1e-esg005.ad1.nhs.net finally g...
The reply to this request was sent along with the reply from the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives:
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/re...
The reply to this request was sent along with the reply from the Advisory Council on National Records and Archives:
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/re...
Something seems to have gone badly wrong with the part of WhatDoTheyKnow that censors PDF files. I've put uncensored (and hence undamaged) copies of t...
The message immediately above is the one that was sent to the wrong address earlier.
--
Ben Harris, WhatDoTheyKnow volunteer.
You should have been able to set the state using the "Update the status of this request" link at the bottom of the page. Anyway, I've set it correctly...
The address given is the FOI address at 5 Boroughs Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, which incorporates Knowsley Integrated Provider Services. Request...
A number of annotations have been removed from this request because they were only tangentially connected to the subject of the request itself.
--...
A number of annotations have been removed from this request because they were only tangentially connected to the subject of the request itself.
--...
The response dated 4th August above was originally sent to the wrong address, which is why it appears our of order.
--
Ben Harris, WhatDoTheyKnow v...
If you want to trace the next step, you can request information from the Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority here:
<http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/bod...
The response dated 21st October above was sent to the address for a different request, which is why it appears out of order.
--
Ben Harris, WhatDoT...
The mis-addressed reply mentioned above has now been moved to its correct request.
--
Ben Harris, WhatDoTheyKnow volunteer.
The above response was misdirected to another request. Richard Killip replied to it as follows:
“Dear Jane
“Thank you for your response.
“Can yo...
The outgoing message dated 10th December above was attached to this message by mistake. It should have been attached to <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com...
The original response, which was received on 5th September 2011, has been removed because it contained the signature of the sender. The new version ap...
It doesn't look like King's College has responded to any of the requests submitted to it through WhatDoTheyKnow. I suspect that a reference to the Inf...
The Decision Notice is here: <http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2011/fer_0417414.ashx>
It looks as though Ms Pointer's email address doesn't work. You can use the "Send follow up" link on the first message to send a message to the centra...
The response to this request is here: <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/continuing_healtcare_for_spinal#incoming-226162>
In case it's not obvious, the substantive part of the response is only visible if you click "show quoted sections".
I'm a volunteer administrator on WhatDoTheyKnow (see <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/credi...>). Any annotations I make in an administrative capacity will be signed “Ben Harris, WhatDoTheyKnow volunteer”. Otherwise, I speak only for myself.