This person's 428 annotations
(page 17)
A reply to this (stating no information held) has turned up over in <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/taxation_benefits_provided_to_em>.
A reply to this (stating no information held) has turned up over in <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/taxation_benefits_provided_to_em>.
A reply to this (stating no information held) has turned up over in <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/taxation_benefits_provided_to_em>.
I think your question 1 is answered by paragraph 25 of the MOU.
That's rather interesting, but I don't think it's the right order. I expect the one I've asked for to be the one that defined all the parking places,...
Yes, I found that decision yesterday where you'd posted it on another request. Thank you.
I suspect that if I challenged this I might win, but at pr...
I've now produced a version of the Order with all the amendments applied at <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areaa.html>.
It turns out that WhatDoTheyKnow now has a feature allowing one to change the state of a request even when no response has been received, so I've done...
This seems to have been answered (more or less) over in <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/bridge_street_area_cambridge_ord>.
I've successfully extracted the PDFs from these documents (using a grotty perl script) and put them on my Web site under <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/>....
I've put up a rough "as amended" version at <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areaz.html>. I suspect that I'm still missing copies of some amending orders,...
The council appear to have misinterpreted the question, which asked for details of gifts supplied by CoS etc to the Council, as asking about gifts supp...
I've requested a copy of the first of these (which a little Googling suggests covers the city centre) at <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/the_cit...
While CCC didn't usefully respond to this request, DfT were able to provide me with a (paper) copy of what appears to be the only relevant authorisatio...
While CCC haven't usefully responded to this, DfT did manage to find the authorisation (but not the corresponding plans or diagrams) in their archives....
It might help you to know that the Traffic Signs Manual (<http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/tss/tsmanual/>, chapter 5, section 22.16) says that these mar...
All of the communication about this request, which was entirely successful, seems to have been filed under <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/traff...
A request for clarification of this request turned up in one of my other requests: <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/traffic_signs_authorisations_...
I also received a list of the locations marked "C" by private (marked as confidential) e-mail.
The third one of these has been answered in <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/plan_gt462014_36_locations_marke>, where the council says:
"Theor...
If you want to communicate with the Council, it's probably best to use the "Reply to this message link" rather than leaving an annotation since annotat...
"XX" is a 160mm "pedal cycles and solo motorcycles only" sign. "XXIII" is a 160mm version of diagram 957.
Because it's more interesting than working, I had a look at this on the various old OS maps on EDINA Digimap. They show what is currently 19 Lime Grov...
An explanation for anyone wondering what this request is about, here's the relevant part of the authorisation:
"18. authorises the placing, at or wit...
I haven't scanned them, largely because they're both dull and a bit of a copyright nightmare (part DfT, part OS, part Cambridge City and Cambridgeshire...
I'm a volunteer administrator on WhatDoTheyKnow (see <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/credi...>). Any annotations I make in an administrative capacity will be signed “Ben Harris, WhatDoTheyKnow volunteer”. Otherwise, I speak only for myself.