This person's 429 annotations
(page 16)
Those links reassembled:
<http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/politics/Twitter-insult-report-council-chief-executive/article-1100519-detail/article.html>...
I think the link in the original request was meant to be <http://www.tpuc.org/content/accepted-value-and-treasury-liquidation-do>.
Paper copy posted today in good time for the last collection.
As far as I'm aware, the law in question is regulation 36 of the Traffic Signs Regulation 2002, which quite clearly does allow certain vehicles to run...
Cambridgeshire is landlocked, so unless you have a very loose definition of "sea", the answer will be "none".
I suspect you know this already, but for the Network Rail bits of London Overground you should be able to find the official platform lengths in the Sec...
My scan of the Castle Court copy: <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/g13.pdf>
No response as yet either here or by post. I'll give them a couple more days and then start prodding.
It looks like Knowledge Dock haven't quite got the hang of this FOI business, and their refusal notice fails to conform with section 17 of FOIA in the...
That link, glued back together again: <http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1982/cukpga_19820045_en_4#pt2-pb3-l1g29>
The request referred to is <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/have_ceos_been_instructed_to_rem>.
The requestor appears to have complained to the Infomation Commissioner about the handling of the request, and the Commissioner's Decision Notice (refe...
Scans of the paper versions of the order and its amendments:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/aread.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/d01.pdf>
<http://bjh...
The scan of this order is at <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areae.pdf>.
I've now scanned the order and its amendments as held at Castle Court:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areac.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/c01.pdf>
<...
Scans of the amending orders:
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/b01.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/b02.pdf>
<http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/b03.pdf>
<http...
The Council have now told me that this request took over 30 hours of officer time to collate. Ref <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/11886/respons...
A scan of the order itself (as seen at Castle Court) is now at <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/areab.pdf>. Amendments later.
A rough scan of the first two pages is now on line at <http://bjh21.me.uk/traffic/crmcrc.pdf>. I've omitted the map since I don't have a licence from...
I visited Castle Court today and was able to inspect a paper copy of the order (about 100 pages including amendments). I was told that if I want to ma...
I visited Castle Court today and obtained a paper copy of this order, which is only three pages long. I'll scan it and put it on line with the rest.
I've emailed the Council reporting this mistake and also suggesting that they might like to update various links to point to their 2009 publication sch...
Paragraph 67 of <http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/decisionnotices/2009/fs_50176016.pdf> indicates that the Information Commissioner isn't in prin...
The URL in my request has become invalid, but the particular list mentioning this order is still available at <http://www.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/NR/rdon...
It's there now: <http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/body/knowledge_dock_uel_limited>