This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 8)
LoL. Archibald, LooooL. FYI: Did you see that a bloke got off regarding TV License due to conspiracy argument? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZBM-p...
Dear Sir
Following the above information request I am pleased to provide the following information:
The number of summonses issued in 2012/13 for non...
Dear Mr.Archibald,
Thank you for your e-mail, as stated in my response I can confirm that Highbury Corner magistrates' court process council tax summo...
Dear Archibald,
In your request dated 31 January 2014, you asked the following:
Please disclose the number of summonses issued in 2012/13 for non o...
Dear Sir/Madam
I write in respect of your Freedom of Information Act Request below.
Please refer to the highlighted information by way of respo...
FOI-14-93
Dear Sir
Re: Freedom of Information Request
Please find enclosed a response to your Freedom of Information request.
P...
re, The Social Entitlement Tribunal appeal
http://www.scribd.com/doc/164658925/Social-Entitlement-Tribunal-Grounds-of-appeal-redacted-pdf?2=0
It se...
Dear Sir
DVLA can only confirm that HMRC vetted all suppliers entering into the contract and were satisfied with the outcome before awarding the contr...
This person's 18 annotations
"The principle was set out in the 1816 case of Devaynes v Noble (commonly referred to as “Clayton’s case”. "
Devaynes v Noble 1816 (Clayton's case)...
I anticipate almost none of the cases referred will be successful and receive a payment. The department will be just for show and cost a couple of mill...
I believe the person currently holding the position of head of Special Payments Unit is Mr William Murphy.
The DWP provided a link in its response (below) enabling some data to be obtained:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/falsifying_unemployment_fig...
Arnold!
Check out the attachment. The figures don't stack up:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/171329/response/458034/attach/3/LBH2390613%20F...
Thank you Arnold for supplying a link to those documents, however, I already attached them to my original FOI request.
Haringey Borough Council have stated:
"2. The costs charged cover the administrative cost of both issuing a summons and obtaining a liability order."...
Thanks for that information Jack.
I hope the particular Select Committee Room chosen for the grilling has quick access to cells attached in the vicin...
Arnold,
You are being lied to. This is standard practice, however, the Department of Communities and Local Government are on to them.
Have a read o...
Please note Pendle Borough Council's response on 18 June 2013;
It's clear from the income review reports to the Executive that the Council's fees an...
Arnold,
Re, your 14 June 2013 response
"3) You have been informed incorrectly, we pay a fee for every summons not just per account."
I'm sure...
I omitted something in the previous annotation.
The reduction in the estimate to £49 was not solely down to the way summonses were accounted for....
I've noticed an error in the attached spreadsheet which sticks out like a sore thumb.
On the CTAX page, £42,000 relates to court fees at £3 per item...
If it's any help (re; SLA CenSus redacted.pdf)
The redacted bit at paragraph 3.17 of the Service Level Agreement might not be all that different to...
Please note Cherwell District Council's response on 8 May 2013;
"We have a corporate debt recovery team responsible for the collection of council ta...
Please note North East Lincolnshire Council's response on 21 February and 14 March 2012;
It's clear from the attached Job Descriptions (21 February)...
It's clear that the majority of work itemised in Southwark Borough Council's response relates to activities (incurred costs) post liability order and t...
Please note Manchester City Council's response on 27 November 2012;
" b) A very significant amount of work is undertaken after a Liability Order is...