Five G testing in Liverpool rollout

Waiting for an internal review by Liverpool City Council of their handling of this request.

Dear Liverpool City Council, it has come to my attention the the residents of Kensington have Five G test installations . Ward Councillor Noakes says he has no concern because he doesn't read the Liverpool Echo readers letters
1.what is Councillor Noakes scientific qualifications?
2 has he a electrical engineering telecommunications background and Health implications
3 The Liverpool Echo has local democracy reporters
Paid by the BBC to report local and inform local residents of all things council.

What are the health implications of multi cell sites around the population of Kensington close to homes schools shops
What scientific studies has Noakes read demonstrating
The safety of this Technology? Before making a
sweeping statement on social media then deleted the tweet .
The residents of Kensington and the citizens of Liverpool deserve to know and not to PRE JUDGE

Can we look at studies to date where Five G has been halted due to Biological effects issues and Safety issues before rollout by other city's and countries

Who in the City council gave this the go ahead and what monies have LCC received for this

Yours faithfully,

Paul Traynor

Adult Services and Health, Liverpool City Council

Information request
Our reference: 686271

show quoted sections

Dear Adult Services and Health, who is responsible for the rollout of Five G and when will residents be informed about the rollout and health and safety issues

Yours sincerely,

Paul Traynor

Information Requests, Liverpool City Council

2 Attachments

Dear Mr Traynor

 

Please see attached our response to your information request as submitted
to Liverpool City Council.     

 

Regards

 

Information Team

 

Information Requests

Liverpool City Council

[1][email address]

[2]LCC auto signature (2)

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/

Liverpool City Council

 
Dear Sir/Madam
 
Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Thank you for your request for information that was received on 11 June
2019 concerning Dear Adult Services and Health, who is responsible for the
rollout of Five G and when will residents be informed about the rollout
and health and safety issues
 
We are dealing with your request under the Freedom of Information Act
2000 and we aim to send a response by 9 July 2019.
 
In some case, a fee may be payable. If we decide a fee is payable, we will
send you a fee notice and we will require you to pay the fee before
proceeding with your request.
 
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 may restrict the release of some or
all of the information you have requested. We will carry out an assessment
and if any exemptions apply to some or all of the information then we
might not provide that information to you. We will inform you if this is
the case and advise you of your rights to request an internal review and
to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office.
 
We will also advise you if we cannot provide you with the information
requested for any other reason together with the reason(s) why and details
of how you may appeal (if appropriate).
 
Yours faithfully
 
Information Team
Liverpool City Council
 
NOTE: Please do not edit the subject line when replying to this email.
 
LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL DISCLAIMER
This email contains proprietary confidential information some or all of
which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of
privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, an addressing or transmission error
has misdirected this e-mail; you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
disseminate the information contained within this e-mail. Please notify
the author immediately by replying to this email.
Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states these to be the views of
Liverpool City Council.
This email has been scanned for all viruses and all reasonable precautions
have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. Liverpool City
Council cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from
the use of this email or attachments.

Dear Liverpool City Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Liverpool City Council's handling of my FOI request 'Five G testing in Liverpool rollout'.

Liverpool city council does not hold Councillor's science Degree or Scientific background
So I will take that as a no qualifications or Scientific background that cllr Noakes has
He should step aside and let a more qualified person with the relevant Degree and Scientific background to be in in this Five G rollout
I was sent two citations from two science journals and on further investigation it's does not prove or disprove that Five G microwave and Emf that it is safe
May I pass on to cllr Noakes t citations as he has no concerns (social media post he deleted )
https://www.spandidos-publications.com/1...

5G technology has been studied by some in the military showing broad harm and some newer studies are showing damage to insects, tissue burns and overheating with streaming of data, but there has been NO safety testing of 5G before it is rolled out.

https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/reports-w...

https://ehtrust.org/small-cells-mini-cel...

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/f...

Yours faithfully,

Paul Traynor Bsc

Liverpool City Council

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Traynor,
 
Please see attached response to your request.
 
Regards
 
Information Team
 
LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL DISCLAIMER
This email contains proprietary confidential information some or all of
which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of
privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, an addressing or transmission error
has misdirected this e-mail; you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
disseminate the information contained within this e-mail. Please notify
the author immediately by replying to this email.
Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states these to be the views of
Liverpool City Council.
This email has been scanned for all viruses and all reasonable precautions
have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. Liverpool City
Council cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from
the use of this email or attachments.

Dear Liverpool City Council,

The idea behind 5G is to use untapped bandwidth of the extremely high-frequency millimeter wave (MMW), between 30GHz and 300GHz, in addition to some lower and mid-range frequencies.

High-frequency MMWs travel a short distance. Furthermore, they don’t travel well through buildings and tend to be absorbed by rain and plants, leading to signal interference. Thus, the necessary infrastructure would require many smaller, barely noticable cell towers situated closer together, with more input and output ports than there are on the much larger, easier to see 4G towers. This would likely result in wireless antennas every few feet, on every lamp post and utility pole in your neighbourhood.

Here are some numbers to put things into perspective: as of 2015, there were 308,000 wireless antennas on cell towers and buildings. That’s double the 2002 number. Yet 5G would require exponentially more, smaller ones, placed much closer together, with each emitting bursts of radiofrequency radiation (RFR)–granted, at levels much lower than that of today’s 4G cell towers–that will be much harder to avoid because these towers will be ubiquitous. If we could see the RFR, it would look like a smog that’s everywhere, all the time.
First, it’s important to know that in 2011, the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer classified RFR as a potential 2B carcinogen

Many studies have associated low-level RFR exposure with a litany of health effects, including:

DNA single and double-strand breaks (which leads to cancer)
oxidative damage (which leads to tissue deterioration and premature ageing)
disruption of cell metabolism
increased blood-brain barrier permeability
melatonin reduction (leading to insomnia and increasing cancer risks)
disruption of brain glucose metabolism
generation of stress proteins (leading to myriad diseases)
As mentioned, the new 5G technology utilizes higher-frequency MMW bands, which give off the same dose of radiation as airport scanners. The effects of this radiation on public health have yet to undergo the rigours of long-term testing. Adoption of 5G will mean more signals carrying more energy through the high-frequency spectrum, with more transmitters located closer to people’s homes and workplaces–basically a lot more (and more potent) RFR
Will Five G warnings be put out for residents at appropriate locations ?

Yours sincerely,

Paul Traynor Bsc