Women's pensions (1950"s born)
30/03/2018
Dear Department for Work and Pensions,
I am writing to highlight some of the problems being experienced by women like myself, born in the 1950’s and suffering hardship or potential hardship because of non-communicatio, misinformation and the unfair acceleration of changes to our qualifying state pension age.
The DWP did not properly inform us as individuals of the original changes to SPA brought about by the 1995 Act, with many of us being unaware that the date from which we could claim our pension was being extended by up to five years. This was further exacerbated by the 2011 Act which accelerated the process further still resulting in many, like myself, having to wait a further year, so 6 additional years in total. Indeed, when I finally accessed the DWP website to try and check my position, it carried ambiguous misinformation up until last month so that it was still not clear whether or not I qualified for the full pension. I found out more from social media on sites like #BackTo60 and #OneVoice than I was able to from the DWP.
When you look at the bigger picture women have and are continuing to be further disadvantaged because:-
· Historically workplace pensions were not always available to women of our generation
· We were expected to look after our families first - having any career came second if at all, hence many of us stayed home to look after our children and elderly relatives and if we had a job at all it was low paid and part time for at least a part of our lives
· There has always been a gender pay gap - this is as true today as it was forty years ago, which means women have less funds to put towards any workplace pension if they have employment. The gender pay gap exists into retirement with women on average 40 per cent worse off than their male counterparts.
· Although certain statistics point to increased longevity, there are also new statistics indicating that this is, in fact, slowing down. Additionally, the figures don’t take into account that rich pensioners generally live longer than poorer ones
· If women have a male partner/husband who helps financially, they are often several years older, in poor health and need care
· If we don’t have a partner/husband or are widowed and live alone, we still have to find the money to pay household bills, buy food and try to make ends meet
· Equalisation of the state pension age failed to take these important gender differences into account. It is clear that men of similar age to ourselves have an unfair advantage because of the above issues.
* Those women lucky enough to have a workplace pension, often find that this was "contracted out" of the state pension which means that their National Insurance contributions for those years don't count towards the state pension so even when they come to receive it many will find that it has been reduced. This was never properly explained or understood and affects both men and women.
Our generation have funded previous pensioners and expected to be as fairly treated as they were. We went to work earlier than most of the current younger generations, did not have help with childcare costs as they do, did not have the same chances to further education and we have already paid more than the qualifying National Insurance contributions, yet are expected to work longer still, pay in even more and receive less. This is a triple whammy and on top of this, the changes mean we must also wait to qualify for other pensioner benefits such as a bus pass or fuel allowance.
These things have been discussed many times and at length in Parliament, it has been acknowledged that these changes are unfair and leave many 1950’s women in poverty and yet nothing has been done to put things right. Why were we not properly informed individually following the 1995 Act and why were the dates so unfairly accelerated by the 2011 Act. For many of us this has resulted in a six year wait for our state pension and not the maximum of 18 months spun out by the DWP when trying to justify these measures. When will these issues be properly addressed and something done to alleviate financial pressures for this disadvantaged group?
Yours sincerely
Mrs G P Lidgett
This is an automated confirmation that your request for information has
been accepted by the DWP FoI mailbox.
By the next working day your request will be forwarded to the relevant
information owner within the Department who will respond to you direct.
If your email is a Freedom of Information request you can normally
expect a response within 20 working days.
Should you have any further queries in connection with this request do
please contact us.
For further information on the Freedom of Information Act within DWP
please click on the link below.
[1]http://www.dwp.gov.uk/freedom-of-informa...
References
Visible links
1. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/freedom-of-informa...
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request.
You can expect a reply by 30 April 2018 unless I need to come back to you to clarify your request or the balance of the public interest test needs to be considered.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.
Yours sincerely
DWP Strategy FoI Team
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing [DWP request email] or by writing to DWP, Central FoI Team,
Caxton House, Tothill Street, SW1H 9NA. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter. Please remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner’s Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF
www.ico.org.uk/Global/contact_us or telephone 0303 123 1113 or 01625 545745
30/03/2018
Dear Department for Work and Pensions,
I am writing to highlight some of the problems being experienced by women like myself, born in the 1950’s and suffering hardship or potential hardship because of non-communicatio, misinformation and the unfair acceleration of changes to our qualifying state pension age.
The DWP did not properly inform us as individuals of the original changes to SPA brought about by the 1995 Act, with many of us being unaware that the date from which we could claim our pension was being extended by up to five years. This was further exacerbated by the 2011 Act which accelerated the process further still resulting in many, like myself, having to wait a further year, so 6 additional years in total. Indeed, when I finally accessed the DWP website to try and check my position, it carried ambiguous misinformation up until last month so that it was still not clear whether or not I qualified for the full pension. I found out more from social media on sites like #BackTo60 and #OneVoice than I was able to from the DWP.
When you look at the bigger picture women have and are continuing to be further disadvantaged because:-
· Historically workplace pensions were not always available to women of our generation
· We were expected to look after our families first - having any career came second if at all, hence many of us stayed home to look after our children and elderly relatives and if we had a job at all it was low paid and part time for at least a part of our lives
· There has always been a gender pay gap - this is as true today as it was forty years ago, which means women have less funds to put towards any workplace pension if they have employment. The gender pay gap exists into retirement with women on average 40 per cent worse off than their male counterparts.
· Although certain statistics point to increased longevity, there are also new statistics indicating that this is, in fact, slowing down. Additionally, the figures don’t take into account that rich pensioners generally live longer than poorer ones
· If women have a male partner/husband who helps financially, they are often several years older, in poor health and need care
· If we don’t have a partner/husband or are widowed and live alone, we still have to find the money to pay household bills, buy food and try to make ends meet
· Equalisation of the state pension age failed to take these important gender differences into account. It is clear that men of similar age to ourselves have an unfair advantage because of the above issues.
* Those women lucky enough to have a workplace pension, often find that this was "contracted out" of the state pension which means that their National Insurance contributions for those years don't count towards the state pension so even when they come to receive it many will find that it has been reduced. This was never properly explained or understood and affects both men and women.
Our generation have funded previous pensioners and expected to be as fairly treated as they were. We went to work earlier than most of the current younger generations, did not have help with childcare costs as they do, did not have the same chances to further education and we have already paid more than the qualifying National Insurance contributions, yet are expected to work longer still, pay in even more and receive less. This is a triple whammy and on top of this, the changes mean we must also wait to qualify for other pensioner benefits such as a bus pass or fuel allowance.
These things have been discussed many times and at length in Parliament, it has been acknowledged that these changes are unfair and leave many 1950’s women in poverty and yet nothing has been done to put things right. Why were we not properly informed individually following the 1995 Act and why were the dates so unfairly accelerated by the 2011 Act. For many of us this has resulted in a six year wait for our state pension and not the maximum of 18 months spun out by the DWP when trying to justify these measures. When will these issues be properly addressed and something done to alleviate financial pressures for this disadvantaged group?
Yours sincerely
Mrs G P Lidgett
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #474497 email]
Is [DWP request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to Department for Work and Pensions? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the latest advice from the ICO:
https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
FoI 1673
Please see the attached reply to your Freedom of Information request.
Yours sincerely
DWP Strategy FoI Team
J Roberts left an annotation ()
David Hencke latest:
'Leaked document says nearly all not to get one penny compensation – despite his finding of partial maladministration – and WASPI appears to have covered this up'
https://davidhencke.com/2022/12/12/exclu...
J Roberts left an annotation ()
Penetrating analysis by PHSO the Facts:
https://phsothetruestory.com/2023/01/25/...
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
J Roberts left an annotation ()
David Hencke's latest:
'Delivered to Downing Street: Jocelynne Scutt’s tribunal report on the horrors facing #50swomen who faced delayed pensions'
https://davidhencke.com/2022/11/03/deliv...
That confidential Ombudsman’s report on 50s women pensions summary in full: For the benefit of all WASPI members
https://davidhencke.com/2022/09/30/that-...