Winton Keenen - the lying Corrupt CC - continues to PROTECT Terrorists / IRA and COVER UP in Martin McGartland attempted murder

Martin McGartland made this Freedom of Information request to Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioner This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

The request was refused by Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioner.

Martin McGartland

Martin McGartland

29 May 2019

Dear Vera Baird,

Winton Keenen - the lying Corrupt CC - continues to PROTECT Terrorists - IRA and COVER UP in Martin McGartland's attempted murder case ...

Winton 'Cover Up' Keenen has also;

1. Lied to victim of attempted murder (Martin McGartland) soooooooooo many times

2. Has blocked, obstructed, covered up, failed to properly investigate and Whitewashed complaints made by Martin McGartland. All done to protect himself and his Bent, Corrupt mates and the corrupt Northumbria Police force.

3. Lied to the IPCC and the IOPC (and others) concerning Martin McGartland, his cases;

4. Concealed, covered up documents and information in Martin McGartland cases. All done to protect himself (Winton Keenen) and other Corrupt officers, Northumbria Police who are (and were) involved in the most serious corruption.

5. Covered up the Roger Ford review recommendations and the review report (and has not acted on them - for above reasons)

6. Is obstructing an external independent investigation into Martin McGartland's attempted murder by an outside police force (and has been doing so for more than 5 years - again for above reasons)

7. Covering up the Jon Boutcher October 2018 review report and recommendations and his failing to act on those (again for above reasons)

8. Covering up (and obstructing) the disclosure of the the Bedfordshire redacted review report to Martin McGartland. A document that was redacted by Bedfordshire Police so that it could be disclosed to Martin McGartland. But Winton Keenen has ignored the CC Jon Boutcher / Bedfordshire Police recommendation, that copy of the redacted report be disclosed to the victim (Martin McGartland).

9. Has been (and to date) covering up terrorist involvement in Martin McGartland's attempted murder for 13 years (NP covering it up for past 20 years). And he, NP (as above) have been protecting suspects / terrorists who tried to murder Martin McGartland from arrest / justice. And have conspired with other State agencies and British Government to do so.

I could go on, and on.... and on..... and on...... #Bentascanbe

I would like to know under FOIA.

- How many complaints (both recorded & unrecorded) have been made against Winton Keenen since he became Chief Constable of Northumbria Police?

Yours faithfully,

Martin McGartland

Enquiries, Northumbria Police and Crime Commissioner

Dear Sir,

In relation to your FOI below, I can respond as follows.

1) 13 complaints received - all of which were recorded. Every complainant had the right to appeal to the IOPC should they wish to have done so. None were upheld.

Yours sincerely.

Kevin

Kevin Payne
Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner for Northumbria

show quoted sections

Martin McGartland

Martin McGartland

19 June 2019

Dear Kevin,

As you, Vera Baird and OPCC Northumbria are well aware .... CC Winton Keenen - my complaints against him - have NEVER been properly investigated. CC Winton Keenen (where I and my cases are concerned) has been protected by PCC/OPCC Northumbria from any type pf proper and independent investigation.

Regards IOPC/IPCC..... they have been involved in the most serious corruption in my cases (and since as far back as 2006 - and to date) . They have colluded and conspired with the police in my cases. And have protected and covered up for police (including for NP, Winton Keenen and others).

Do I need to remind you (lights on, no one at home) that the Corrupt IOPC/IPCC (are funded (and controlled were needed) by the corrupt Home Office. THe Home Office have been at the coal face of my cases since 1991 - and to date) and they covered up for and protected PIRA the terrorist who tried to murder me. Corrupt CC Winton (like other CC's before him) and when it concerns me, my cases are in the pockets of MI5/Home Office and MI5 (who are pulling the strings).

Many of the people within the IOPC/IPCC who are controlling my cases are themselves former police officers (Police covering up for and protecting the police). It is CORRUPTION Kevin but not as we know it.

You may have already seen the very latest news regards: "MP [ Ian Lucas] claims ‘systematic cover-up’ involving North Wales Police, probation service, CRC, IPCC and IOPC over Nicolas Churton murder.."
Link here fyi: http://www.wrexham.com/news/mp-claims-sy...

I rest my case regards IOPC/IPCC beting corrupt.... and their cover-ups.... colluding with police etc. You / OPCC Northumbria should give up while your behind.

It is noted that Corrupt Winton Keenen, NP or any others have taken any type of legal action (which would be funded by taxpayer - and not them) against me for exposing (as above) their Lies, Corruption, cover ups and botching an attempted murder investigation etc? Why do you think that is? Because it is the truth...., more than their Corrupt Jobs are worth.

I not that OPCC Northumbria have still not deal with this FOI (and others) and that they are containing to cover up for and protect Corrupt Winton Keenen, Team Winton and NP when it concerns me, my cases.

As it stands, CC Winton Keenen has NEVER to date been investigated regarding the complaints have made against him. He has been protected from investigation by his Corrupt PSD, NP.

Vera Baird, her office have also failed to investigate my complaints against CC Keenen.

It is also noted that Vera Baird (while PCC), OPCC Northumbria (or you) nor NP (or even Corrupt Winton Keenen) have EVER disputed my above / other comments I have made regards Winton Keenen, NP. corruption Etc in my cases. That too is telling.

Yours sincerely,

Martin McGartland

Martin McGartland (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

MP[ Ian Lucasclaims] ‘systematic cover-up’ involving North Wales Police, probation service, CRC, IPCC and IOPC over Nicolas Churton murder

Wrexham’s MP has spoken in Parliament about ‘grave errors’ made before the brutal murder of a Wrexham resident – while heavily criticising subsequent attempts by the authorities to establish what went wrong.

Ian Lucas led an adjournment debate in the main Commons chamber yesterday on ‘police complaints, accountability and the case of Nicholas Churton’.

Mr Churton was murdered in his Wrexham home in March 2017 by a dangerous offender, Jordan Davidson, who was on licence from prison at the time. Davidson had been arrested and taken into custody four days before the murder for possession of a knife, only to be released rather than being sent back to prison. Mr Lucas read out an account of a second threat to life in Wrexham town centre when Davidson pulled a machete on a man trying to intervene on a robbery in the period after he had murdered Mr Churton.

Mr Lucas has spent two years trying to find out why Davidson was freed to murder Mr Churton, and commit a series of other serious offences, but says several key questions remain unanswered.

In yesterday’s speech he praised the ‘commendable bravery’ of the officers who arrested Davidson. However, he was heavily critical of North Wales Police, the probation service and the Independent Office of Police Conduct (IOPC) over their failure to give him answers in relation to the case.

Speaking in the Chamber, Mr Lucas said: “Davidson is responsible for this horrific crime and for other attacks for which he is now serving a 30-year prison sentence. However, the events leading to those crimes revealed grave errors by the police and by the probation services in Wrexham and North Wales.”

Mr Lucas added: “I have secured knowledge of the detail of those errors only with the assistance of Jez Hemming of the Daily Post newspaper in north Wales. For the bulk of this case, I have secured no co-operation whatever from North Wales police.

“Indeed, I now believe that I, along with the public, was misled deliberately about the facts of the case to conceal those errors, and that there has been a systematic cover-up involving North Wales police, the probation service, the community rehabilitation company, the Independent Police Complaints Commission and the Independent Office for Police Conduct.”

Davidson was known to Mr Churton and had approached him in the days before the murder.

An IOPC investigation into Mr Churton’s contact with the police was launched in the days following his death – yet Mr Lucas was not informed of this important development. It is IOPC protocol for local MPs to be told.

Mr Lucas contacted North Wales Police later that year after learning of Davidson’s arrest and release for possession of an offensive weapon, days before the murder. But the then Chief Constable, Mark Polin, said he could not comment because the IOPC was investigating ‘all contact’ the police had with Davidson prior to Mr Churton’s death. Mr Lucas says this was, in fact, not true as the IOPC was only investigating police contact with Mr Churton, not the contact with Davidson.

Following pressure from Mr Lucas, a second IOPC investigation was opened – this time focusing on police contact with Davidson – but it only began in April 2018, more than a year on from the crime. The first IOPC investigation has finished, resulting in misconduct cases for two officers, but the second inquiry is ongoing.

Mr Lucas this week wrote to North Wales Police & Crime Commissioner Arfon Jones to ask him to look into the statements made to him by Mr Polin, who has since left the force.

Mr Lucas posed several questions in the House of Commons yesterday to the Minister for Policing and the Fire Service (Mr Nick Hurd):
– Why did North Wales police and the IPCC fail to tell me of a police conduct inquiry involving a murder and additional serious assaults in the middle of my constituency?
– Secondly, who decided to exclude the police decision to release Davidson on bail after his arrest for possession of an offensive weapon from the terms of reference of the IPCC inquiry, and why was that done?
– Thirdly, why did the then chief constable of North Wales, Mark Polin, tell me that there was an inquiry into Davidson’s release when there was not?
– Fourthly, was the North Wales police and crime commissioner notified of the inquiry by the IPCC in 2017, and of its terms of reference? Is there an obligation to notify PCCs of such inquiries? If a notification was made in this case, when was it made?
-Fifthly, was the family of Nicholas Churton notified of the inquiry, and the fact of the release of Davidson four days before his murder?
– Sixthly, why did the probation service and the CRC fail to highlight the fact that the release of Davidson was not included in the IPCC inquiry? Should they have done so?

Mr Lucas added: “It is now over two years since Nicholas Churton was brutally murdered. We need an independent investigation into how this happened. I have no confidence in the various bodies and organisations that I have referred to because none of them and none of the systems worked to reveal the errors in this case, which had catastrophic consequences. What we need above all is some transparency ​and honesty from the organisations involved. The family of Nicholas Churton, with whom I have been working, deserve that honesty.”

The Minister replied, “I know the hon. Gentleman to be a man of common sense and experience in this place. When I hear him articulate his feeling that he has been personally misled and talk about a systematic cover-up, I know that he will not be using that language lightly. I take that seriously and congratulate him on his persistence and his campaign on this.”

“I heard clearly the hon. Gentleman’s frustration about his engagement with the police and the system and the degree to which he feels misled—a powerful word in this context. I understand that he has been in correspondence with and met senior members of North Wales police to discuss its organisational learning, its response to date and intended actions. If he feels that contact has not been substantive or that there are issues that continue to need to be addressed, he and I should discuss that. I can certainly help him to make that point directly to North Wales police’s leadership.”

Mr Lucas noted “It is fair to say that North Wales police now has a new chief constable and that this case relates to the previous regime, so to speak” with the Minister replying “…under new leadership, the engagement with the ​hon. Gentleman is more forthcoming, and I welcome that.”

After a lengthy reply (here) from the Minister Mr Lucas said, “My key concern is that Davidson’s release from custody was not made subject to IPCC investigation by North Wales police or by the IPCC, and no one outside the force knew of that fact. It was only when I highlighted it that the investigation commenced. My concern is that the systems are still not in place to make sure it cannot happen again.”

The Minister said: “I understand that message very clearly, and it will be heard by the IOPC. I undertake to make sure that the IOPC has absorbed the message. My understanding is that the first investigation looked at the police’s dealings and contact with Nicholas Churton and the second is looking specifically at their contact and dealings with Jordan Davidson, but the hon. Gentleman’s point is well made. Through the mechanism of this debate and the follow-up, I undertake to make sure that the message is clearly understood by the IOPC as it finalises its work for publication, hopefully this summer.”

Speaking outside the chamber, Mr Lucas said: “This case raises serious concerns about the criminal justice system and the safety of my constituents. It is why I have been so determined to find out what went wrong, yet I have been met with a great many obstacles which have been a cause of huge concern to me. The family of Mr Churton also deserve answers but, sadly, we are still waiting more than two years on from this terrible crime.”

http://www.wrexham.com/news/mp-claims-sy...