We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are T. wilson please sign in and let everyone know.

Will your council supply details of the past so-called investigations by these three reporters?

We're waiting for T. wilson to read recent responses and update the status.

Dear Liverpool City Council,

Tony Reeves, Liverpool city Chief Executive
Jeanette McLoughlin
Michael Jones
Reach PLC London

Will your council supply any details of the past so-called investigations by these three reporters?
Liam Thorp - Executive Political Editor
Joe Thomas - Executive Crime Reporter
Alistair Houghton - Executive Business Editor

1/ a
Did in the past 12 months, any of these reporters ever put in any FOI’s into the dealing of:
Gary Howard
Lin Mari group
Fox street village developments
Primesite – Kerry Tomlinson and his involvement into fox street village

1/ b
Why is there still an outstanding fee of close to £987,000, due to the city of Liverpool council from this project?

2/
Has the city of Liverpool council received any requests from any reporter into this nightmare of ‘Fox street village or asked your office and planning officers for any and all records going back to 2016?

3/
Can the city of Liverpool council show any incoming e-mails from this local newspaper that could prove the paper was indeed investigating fox street village.

4/
Why has the underground 160 car park gone missing from this project and is there full planning permission from 2016 on all the building A, B, C, D, how could an underground 160 car park just go missing and the Liverpool echo could not find it or even too lazy to ask your office or told not to ask? The planning officers, and they also had missed the £900,000 due to the Liverpool city council.

5/
Will the city of Liverpool supply all details as to why Block A is now a hotel and in the planning was this down as student accommodation?

Please see the FOI reply from MFRS.

“Merseyside Fire & Rescue Service conducted an audit of Block A on 20.07.18 and discovered that it was being used as a hotel. An enforcement notice (EM/MERS/397) was issued thereafter. The notice was complied with and so it was withdrawn”.

Will the Council supply the following information on Block A.

[a] In total since Block [A] has been completed how many flats or persons are paying council tax and was Block [A] down in the planning application as only “Student accommodation” and not as a hotel and why did Liam Thorp, blank this intelligence or pass it over to another reporter, Has Liam Thorp a “conflict of interest” due to his relationship with “Danial Hughes and Hughes PR?

Did the city of Liverpool know that Gary Howard was using Hughes PR as his front along with an ex-echo reporter, and Cllr Calvert who has now gone into hiding over this, and Liam Throp who was told to investigate this project along with other echo reporters from last year?
Yet no real facts have come out from this newspaper and why is it covering for Hughes PR and Cllr Calvert?

References: It was the Merseyside Fire & Rescue Authority, not the Liverpool Echo, who got this out in the open, as did ITV Granada reports and members of the public.
The echo had had a full one year to investigate fox street village and decided to blank it, Fact!

Statement provided to the Liverpool Echo 3rd April 2019

A Merseyside Fire & Rescue Authority spokesperson said: “Merseyside Fire & Rescue Authority (MFRA) has been working with Liverpool City Council (LCC) as part of our ongoing work with High Rise Residential premises following the Grenfell Tower fire in June 2017. This work has included inspections of the buildings in Fox Street Village. Concerns have been identified with a specific block which requires improvements to fire safety standards.

Letter from the Editor
The Liverpool Echo - one of the most famous and trusted regional news brands in the world.
The Echo covers Liverpool and Merseyside without fear or favour, and we base our journalism on the following principles:

We get the big stories
We get them first
We fight for our readers and our city
We don’t betray the trust our readers place in us.

Ethics policy
The maintenance of high editorial standards is at the core of the Echo's business philosophy.

Yours faithfully,

T. wilson

Liverpool City Council

 
Dear Sir/Madam
 
Freedom of Information Act 2000
 
Thank you for your request for information that was received on 11 June
2019 concerning 'Will your council supply details of the past so-called
investigations by these three reporters?'
 
We are dealing with your request under the Freedom of Information Act
2000 and we aim to send a response by 9 July 2019.
 
In some case, a fee may be payable. If we decide a fee is payable, we will
send you a fee notice and we will require you to pay the fee before
proceeding with your request.
 
The Freedom of Information Act 2000 may restrict the release of some or
all of the information you have requested. We will carry out an assessment
and if any exemptions apply to some or all of the information then we
might not provide that information to you. We will inform you if this is
the case and advise you of your rights to request an internal review and
to complain to the Information Commissioner's Office.
 
We will also advise you if we cannot provide you with the information
requested for any other reason together with the reason(s) why and details
of how you may appeal (if appropriate).
 
Yours faithfully
 
Information Team
Liverpool City Council
 
NOTE: Please do not edit the subject line when replying to this email.
 
LIVERPOOL CITY COUNCIL DISCLAIMER
This email contains proprietary confidential information some or all of
which may be legally privileged and/or subject to the provisions of
privacy legislation. It is intended solely for the addressee.
If you are not the intended recipient, an addressing or transmission error
has misdirected this e-mail; you must not use, disclose, copy, print or
disseminate the information contained within this e-mail. Please notify
the author immediately by replying to this email.
Any views expressed in this email are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states these to be the views of
Liverpool City Council.
This email has been scanned for all viruses and all reasonable precautions
have been taken to ensure that no viruses are present. Liverpool City
Council cannot accept responsibility for any loss or damage arising from
the use of this email or attachments.

Information Requests, Liverpool City Council

2 Attachments

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Please see attached our response to your information request as submitted
to Liverpool City Council.     

 

Regards

 

Information Team

 

Information Requests

Liverpool City Council

[1][email address]

[2]LCC auto signature (2)

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.liverpool.gov.uk/

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are T. wilson please sign in and let everyone know.