Why has Baroness Uddin been allowed to keep her title?

Captain Bryn Wayt made this Freedom of Information request to Main Honours Advisory Committee

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was successful.

Captain Bryn Wayt

Dear Main Honours Advisory Committee,

Under the FoI Act 2000 I would like to see any papers/documents or correspondence that exists showing why Baroness Uddin has been allowed to keep her title - given that she has overtly broken two of the criteria.

Has any correspondence been raised between your Committee and Baroness Uddin, or the House of Lords, in respect of the question of removing her title?

Yours faithfully,

Captain Bryn Wayt

Main Honours Advisory Committee





Thank you for your request for information. Your request was received on 
6/2/2012 and is being dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000.

This email is just a short acknowledgement of your request.

If you have any queries about this email, please contact me. Please
remember to quote the reference number above in any future communications.

Yours sincerely,

Knowledge and Information Management Unit

Cabinet Office

E: [1][email address]
<[2]mailto:[email address]>



show quoted sections

Vagg, Eileen - Cabinet Office,

1 Attachment

Please find response to  your FOI request


Eileen Vagg

House of Lords Reform Team

Parliament and Constitution Division

Cabinet Office

1 Horse Guards Road

London SW1A 2HQ


0207 271 6400


show quoted sections

Dear Mrs Vagg,

Thank you very much indeed for your clear, concise and most correct response.

I am sorry to have taken up so much of your time on the matter, and I am most obliged for your patient reply which satisfies my question - but understandably, does not solve the 'problem' of this Peer tainting the House of Lords.

Kind wishes,

Yours sincerely,

Captain Bryn Wayt