Who gave UK police authority to be judge and jury with regards what shows up on a enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service check ?

The request was refused by Home Office.

It has come to my attention that UK police constabularies have discretion to employ anybody, they also have discretion to whether a person can work with vulnerable people with a minor conviction.

1) Who gave the Chief Police Officer authority to be judge and jury on spent minor convictions in a common law country ?

2) Who gave the UK police authority to withhold information being written up, like out of court settlements on enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (CRB) disclosures ?

3) Did parliament get consent from commoners to give UK police be Judge and Jury on DBS disclosures?

4) Migrant workers cannot be thoroughly checked for criminal records from blitzed countries, Robin Walker MP has confirmed this to me, yet native people with minor/spent convictions are being discriminated against. Can you quantify what i am saying without attaching links ?

Yours faithfully,

peter danby & associates

FOI Requests, Home Office

Dear Mr Danby,

Thank you for contacting the Home Office with your request.

This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref 40647). We will aim to send you a full response by 05/09/2016 which is twenty working days from the date we received your request.

If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you,

N McKenzie
FOI Requests
Home Office

show quoted sections

FOI Responses, Home Office

1 Attachment

Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information request.

 

 

Home Office

2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF

[1]www.gov.uk/home-office

 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gov.uk/home-office

Dear FOI Responses,

Who are you that is replying to the FOI request? (name required) .

1) As the certificates are issued by the Disclosure and Barring Service (CRB) and information is sent from police constabularies, can you tell me >>> RESPONSE <<< who says what is a serious offence for it to show up on enhanced disclosure ?

2) Act/statutes are by consent, are they not ? Statutes/Acts need consent and as such, people applying for a enhanced have no choice on this matter, is this lawful common law ?

3) Recruitment guidelines do not fall inline with the native peoples checks of the UK, and migrant workers can get a letter (can be fraudulent) from their police constabulary to say they have no criminal convictions, but when a country is blitzed with no infrastructure, their is no way of checking them. Robin Walker MP has confirmed this......

Article 8 of the ECHR says right to private life, freedom from authorities, this is not mentioned on the application form and applicants are unaware of their rights, not that you take any notice".

As i am not satisfied with your response, i ask for a internal review.

regards,

peter danby and associates.

FOI Responses, Home Office

This mailbox does not accept incoming messages. Any FOI requests or
inquiries should be sent to [1][Home Office request email].

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Home Office request email]

Public Enquiries (CD), Home Office

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Danby

 

Please find attached a response to your enquiry.

 

Regards,

 

Home Office

Direct Communications Unit

 

 

show quoted sections

Dear Public Enquiries (CD),

https://youtu.be/s9G7N3gvxkk

Why do you not sign your name E. Seager when replying to this FOI request ?

We are policed by consent" so as is this is the case, i have never seen anything publicised to say sovereign people of this country have consented to the UK police having the right to disclose minor/spent convictions on Disclosure and Barring Service (CRB) disclosures.

Who gave MPs the authority to act on behalf of sovereign human beings of this country without our consent ?

kind regards,

peter danby and associates

Public Enquiries (CD), Home Office

Thank you for contacting the Home Office.

 

Your message has been logged.

 

We aim to provide a response within 20 working days.

show quoted sections

FOI Responses, Home Office

1 Attachment

Dear Peter Danby & Associates,

 

Please see the attached outcome of the internal review into the handling
of FOI request 40647.

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

L. Picton

show quoted sections

Dear FOI Responses,

In July 2012 the Home Office issued guidance under section 113B(4A) of the 1997
Act (“the statutory disclosure guidance”) to assist chief officers of police in (see
paragraph 2) “making appropriate, proportionate and consistent decisions in providing
information from local police records for inclusion in enhanced criminal record
certificates (ECRCs)”. The statutory guidance also contained a number of principles.
Those material in the present context are principles 2 and 3, respectively that
“information must only be provided if it is reasonably believed to be relevant for the
prescribed purpose”, and “information should only be provided if the opinion is that it
ought to be included”. Paragraph 13 of the statutory guidance states that, in order to
decide whether he or she reasonably believes material to be relevant, the chief officer
must consider a number of factors, in particular the credibility and reliability of the
information.

So how can the chief of police conclude that a minor/spent conviction is relevant for the job applied for ? “Making appropriate, proportionate and consistent decisions in providing information from local police records for inclusion in enhanced criminal record.

regards,

peter danby and associates

FOI Responses, Home Office

This mailbox does not accept incoming messages. Any FOI requests or
inquiries should be sent to [1][Home Office request email].

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Home Office request email]

Dear FOI Responses,

Migrant workers from blitzed countries cannot be thoroughly checked for criminal records, Robin Walker MP has agreed with me. Are you know doubting this FOI responses ? So CRB and the UK police discriminate against people with minor/spent criminal convictions".

That's right Robin Walker MP has agreed with me and that's a FACT !

regards,

peter danby and associates

FOI Responses, Home Office

This mailbox does not accept incoming messages. Any FOI requests or
inquiries should be sent to [1][Home Office request email].

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Home Office request email]

FOI Requests, Home Office

Mr. Danby,

Thank you for contacting the Home Office with your request.

This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref 41215). We will aim to send you a full response by 24/10/2016 which is twenty working days from the date we received your request.

If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you,

P. Zebedee
FOI Requests
Home Office

show quoted sections

FOI Responses, Home Office

1 Attachment

Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information request.

 

 

Home Office

2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF

[1]www.gov.uk/home-office

 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gov.uk/home-office