We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Roberts please sign in and let everyone know.

We are asking for all of them to be sacked and investigated, Max Caller needs to look into the FOI team in Cunard office Liverpool

Roberts made this Freedom of Information request to Liverpool City Council This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

We're waiting for Roberts to read a recent response and update the status.

Roberts
Delivered

Dear Liverpool City Council,

Copy to: Mr. Max Caller
Liverpool city council who the people responsible for dealing with the freedom of information request.
Please do these have names?

We are asking for all of them to be sacked and investigated they are acting still above the law and having seen the “Max Caller “report, these are still acting above the law and hiding information.

We also notice not one word or comment from “Liam Thorp” Liverpool Echo on this.

Please reply other wise this will go above the council heads.

Yours faithfully,
Mr. Roberts

Link to this Report
Information Requests, Liverpool City Council

2 Attachments

Dear Mr Roberts

 

Please see attached our response to your information request. In addition,
we note a number of comments included within your request, which are not
reproduced by virtue of the harassing and intimidatory nature of their
content.

 

Liverpool City Council would advise that as a responsible public authority
and employer we have clear obligations and a duty of care and
responsibility to our Officers and employees.

 

As such, and in the event of the continued use of public forums for the
submission of requests accompanied with commentary, speculation, innuendo
and opinion designed to harass or otherwise impact on City Council
employees when undertaking their employment for the City Council, we will
assess and respond to such requests accordingly.

 

For purposes of clarity, any requests which are accompanied by commentary,
speculation, innuendo and opinion designed to harass or otherwise impact
on City Council employees will be considered with due regard to Section 14
which allows a public authority to decline to respond to a request which
may be assessed as vexatious in terms of its content and impact. We will
similarly give consideration to aggregating the costs of multiple and
interlinked requests such as to assess whether the timescale taken for
compliance exceeds that set out at Section 12 of the Freedom of
Information Act 2000. The relevant limit is 18 hours.

 

Regards

Liverpool City Council

[1]LCC autosig LetsGetVaccinated

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links

Link to this Report
We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Roberts please sign in and let everyone know.