Vaccine Data Used in 2005/2006 Research

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Ministry of Defence should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Ministry of Defence,

In 2005/2006 within a research study under the title of ' Vaccine Interaction Research'. It uses Porton Down staff that were exposed to multiple vaccines and then compared to sickness levels (time off work).

Please provide the Porton Down Staff vaccination records used in that study.

Please delete the names of the Porton Down staff before supplying the data to comply with data protection.

Thankyou

Regards

gavin roberts

Dear Ministry of Defence,

This data request is long over due as required by law. Please respond to it within the next 7 days or instruct an internal review on yourselves .Thankyou.

Regards,

gavin roberts

Dear Ministry of Defence,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Ministry of Defence's handling of my FOI request 'Vaccine Data Used in 2005/2006 Research'.

Yet again MOD continue to break the law, not responding to requests within the lawful timescales. We allowed a further 5 weeks on this very simple request. What on earth is going on in Whitehall?

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/v...

This is taxpayer funded and unlawful, simply not good enough and there is no excuse. I repeat we have thousands of sick veterans and their families that want these answers

Regards

gavin roberts
On behalf of sick Veterans

Dear Ministry of Defence,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Ministry of Defence's handling of my FOI request 'Vaccine Data Used in 2005/2006 Research'.

We have requested an internal review, MOD have not responded as required by Law, The internal review has not been initiated as required by Law. Why is MOD continuously breaking the Law? It is not just this request for data but several others?

Has the MOD freedom of information dept collapsed? It is taxpayer funded. What on earth is going on?

Does MOD believe veterans are not worthy of a reply? Does MOD believe it can work outside of the Law?

Queens Regulations state the standards and values required by the troops including Integrity, honesty, transparency. Do these standards not apply to MOD Whitehall staff?

If some kind of contact is not made within the next 7 days, it will leave us with no choice but to bring this matter of freedom of information in front of a judge in the form of an emergency hearing, due to the many thousands sick veterans that this information effects.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/v...

Regards,

Gavin Roberts
On behalf of sick Gulf War Veterans

CIO-FOI-IR (MULTIUSER), Ministry of Defence

Dear Mr Roberts,

 

Thank you for your emails to this office, received during September and
October which relate to the following requests:

 

MOD evidence that any other exposure other than experimental vaccines
caused epedemic levels of chronic autoimmune sickness in troops( Now
veterans)

[1]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/m...

 

Pertusis date of purchase and supplier for the titles Vaccine Interaction
Research 2005/2006

[2]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/p...

 

Adjuvants in Experimental vaccine combinations Gulf War 90/91

[3]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/a...

 

Vaccine Data Used in 2005/2006 Research

[4]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/v...

 

Please be assured that the Department is aware of your outstanding
requests and we have been advised that responses will be sent to you, but
we are currently unable to provide you with a timescale.

 

Unfortunately, we are not in a position to conduct substantive internal
reviews into the handling of these requests until final responses have
been provided to you. It does, however, appear that MOD has failed to
respond to a number of requests within 20 working days and has therefore
breached section 10 of the FOI Act. We apologise for any inconvenience
caused by the delays that you have experienced.

 

Should you remain dissatisfied with the responses when they are provided
to you, please contact us again.

 

Under the FOI Act, you have an absolute right to appeal to the Information
Commissioner under the provisions of section 50 of the Act regardless of
whether the public authority concerned has provided a response or
completed an internal review.

 

Regards,

MOD Information Rights Compliance Team

References

Visible links
1. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
2. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
3. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...
4. https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlo...

Dear CIO-FOI-IR (MULTIUSER),

We cannot see a reason for MOD not to respond to the requests within the already generous due to Covid extended LEGAL timescales. Please explain, unless it is due to MOD have recovered so much data displaying even more corruption (if that is even possible!) for the requests, that they are struggling to cope/ reply having to deal with the corruption/cover up that is being uncovered. Then MOD could have simply just informed us that they are snowed underneath the corruption and we could totally understand that workload, having been dealing with it for 30 months now ourselves having become aware.

The question is, is current MOD staff prepared to put their names to the previous corruption and cover up? Veterans will achieve their justice soon . We are about to release the 30 month report/investigation into this matter, in the next few weeks.

Which side of history does current MOD staff choose to be on?
The corrupt past side?(AKA soon to be exposed side) or with the new government United/Levelling initiatives then walk alongside Veterans exposing the corruption surrounding the Major&Blair governments?

We can't be any fairer than that, you are fully aware of 70% of what we're about to reveal, As we have been discussing through foi for 2 years now. The way forward is to work with us, certainly not ignore us or play the games of the past corrupt administrations. The cat is out of the bag. That is clear.

Your legals have our email, we can sit down with our legals. Or we can have it all out in public. You decide. Doing nothing is not the answer. By our side ? Or against us? Please let us know MOD legals decision.

Kind Regards,

Gavin Roberts
J4V
On behalf of the thousands of sick and fallen Gulf War Veterans families.

Dear CIO-FOI-IR (MULTIUSER),

We would just like to add that MOD are responding to to others and their requests within the normal timescales???Please explain why it is sick Gulf War Veterans are not only NOT being prioritised, but are being discriminated against delaying for months? We can't think of another cohort of veterans dealing with corruptions & Cover ups or any other that could possibly be now in front of us in a queue for data. Are current MOD struggling to match veterans standards and values of integrity?
All we ask is for honesty, transparency and work within the LAWS of the land. We feel this is not too much to ask for.

Kind Regards,

Gavin Roberts
J4V
On behalf of Sick Gulf War veterans and the families of the fallen.

People-Sec-FOI Mailbox (MULTIUSER), Ministry of Defence

2 Attachments

Dear Mr Roberts,

With apologies for the delay in responding to you, please find attached
response to some of your recent FOI requests to the Ministry of Defence.

 

Regards,

 

Defence People Secretariat