Unexplained Fractures in Babies

B McKenzie made this Freedom of Information request to Cumbria Constabulary

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Cumbria Constabulary.

Dear Cumbria Constabulary,

Please could you provide all statistical data you hold, in relation to fractures in babies, going back from 2011 to whatever date is reasonable.

I am particularly interested in

1. The Local Authority Area
2. Name of the Hospital
3. Whether the Fractures had an organic explanation. (If so what was the cause eg. Brittle bones, Vitamin D deficiency etc)
4. Whether the Fractures were recorded as non accidental.
5. Whether a criminal trial ensued.
6. Whether the child was adopted.
7. Whether the child died from the injuries.

I appreciate that it may not be possible to provide all the above listed information however I would be grateful to receive whatever information you have available and signposting towards other organisations who may hold the relevant data.

Yours faithfully,

B McKenzie

FOI Email, Cumbria Constabulary

Dear B McKenzie

 

Thank you for your request for information received via email in this
office on 7 October 2011. This request will be dealt with under the terms
of the Freedom Of Information Act 2000.  Details of the request received:-

Please could you provide all statistical data you hold, in relation to
fractures in babies, going back from 2011 to whatever date is reasonable.

I am particularly interested in

1. The Local Authority Area

2. Name of the Hospital

3. Whether the Fractures had an organic explanation. (If so what was the
cause eg. Brittle bones, Vitamin D deficiency etc)

4. Whether the Fractures were recorded as non accidental.

5. Whether a criminal trial ensued.

6. Whether the child was adopted.

7. Whether the child died from the injuries. 

Your request will now be considered and you will receive a response within
the statutory timescale of 20 working days as defined by the Act, subject
to the information not being exempt or containing a reference to a third
party. In some circumstances Cumbria Constabulary may be unable to achieve
this deadline. If this is likely you will be informed and given a revised
time-scale at the earliest opportunity.

 

In the event that your requirements change or you no longer wish to
receive a response to your request, I would be grateful if you could
advise me of this as soon as possible.

 

There may be a fee payable for the retrieval, collation and provision of
the information you request. If this is the case you will be informed and
the 20 working day timescale will be suspended until we receive payment
from you. If you choose not to make a payment then your request will
remain unanswered.

 

Some requests may also require either full or partial transference to
another public authority in order to answer your query in the fullest
possible way. Again, you will be informed if this is the case.

 

I would like to thank you for your interest in Cumbria Constabulary.

show quoted sections

P Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing
this e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.cumbria.police.uk/
3. http://www.facebook.com/cumbriapolice
4. http://www.twitter.com/cumbriapolice

Cherry, David, Cumbria Constabulary

2 Attachments

Dear B Mckenzie,

Please find attached a response from Cumbria Constabulary to your request for information relating to injuries sustained by children.

Yours sincerely,

show quoted sections

P Please, consider your environmental responsibility. Before printing this e-mail ask yourself: "Do I need a hard copy?"

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

Dear B McKenzie

I can confirm that one such case at least is known to Mr Cherry at Cumbria Police. A case involving false allegations of child abuse in 2003. [potentially defamatory information removed]

The hospital that started the ball rolling is Lancaster royal infirmary, Locum Peadiatrician Ganesan, who was backed up by all NHS Dr's verbatim. Including an expert witness, to cover up the blunder and false allegations levelled at an inncocent family. Thanks to american doctors the family proved they were innocent and that the baby, harmed by neglect by the NHS did have an underlying bone condition, known as OOP.

despite this coming to light, all authorities in cumbria, including police, have colluded to hide their own failures ! to investigate according to their duty and 2, to vindicate and appologise for their shortcomings.

I hold three files which prove neglect of duty of care by professionals in Cumbria, multi agency, to protect vulnerable children from abuse. These files are in a safe place where they will be used as evidence against these corrupt and unlawful so called professionals.

I have lodged the evidence elsewhere and in a number of locations both Uk and International as I am already aware that police will confiscate such files from my home to help them cover up. They already have done on other cases. I have also had intimidating visits from the CID, unanounced to my home in recent months, since I began exposing this truth.

All complaints to professional standards Cumbria have been whitewashed and brutal conduct of police officers towards our family played down and covered up, including perjury in court and perversion of justice, the courts, IPCC, police and Social services are complicit and collude to keep this under wraps. I can only assume that they have much to hide, re child trafficking.

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

In November 2010, the broadcast of Florence Bellona on the problem of the adoption forced Britain had caused the stir. The words "forced adoption" refer to scandals such as that of "l'arche de Zoé" in which Westerners embark foreign children under the pretext of extract to their misery, and without checking if they are really abandoned, for the placing on the market of international adoption.
But the fact that European countries such as the United Kingdom knowingly removes his own children and make them adopt without the consent of parents of birth remains a little-known phenomenon, because the affected families do not have the right to refer their case outside the Court of justice family, still less than in talking to a journalist under sentence of imprisonment.
The United Kingdom has a questionable history in "child protection" since the 19th century. One of the most dramatic episodes lasted 70 years: children stolen from poor families were sent to Australia State program "Migrant Children" to create "a good white strain"! 40 years after the end of the program, the beginning of 2010, Gordon Brown, David Cameron and Nick Clegg have produced a public apology in the House of Commons for this historic disaster.
Recognition of forced exile, despite decades of campaign by the families of victims, has virtually been no media coverage and its managers were never punished. Today, the "gagging order" (gagging order) protects the State, the press freedom, but freedom of expression. The parents came to use alternative media to describe their ordeal and above all, to find their children.
In recent years, is more material poverty but the charges of child abuse which precede the withdrawal children by social services. First, Florence Bellone listened to the explanations of MPs wishing to abolish forced adoption, those of associations for the defence of families and the testimony of parents. It soon became apparent it that parents really abusing would pass not 10 or 15 years to find their children and to all courts including the European Court of Justice to obtain their returns… And above all, there are thousands of women accused of "future negligence" or "future emotional injury" of their child, since the early days of the grossesse… It away the infant at birth and were thus removed each new baby, on the sole basis of a psychiatrist paid by social services. Their crime: have been a victim of domestic violence, either by their parents, or their partner, and very often by the family of home or orphanage or themselves were placed. Several hundred mothers, alone or in couple, fled abroad to keep their baby.
Legal records of these families and stories have him know the extent and variety of the tactics used by social services to parents. Subsequently, by becoming "MacKenzie friend" (legal support to which parents are right when they have no lawyer), Florence Bellone was able to attend hearings in the courts as well as the examinations of the parents by social services. Very often, what appears first as the false evidence are only statements not verified the Court and accepted by the judge as compelling facts. The same is true of the legal "guardians" of abducted children, who represent the child in court!

The continuous survey

In a second report on the "stolen children", Florence Bellone gives more speaking parents who have lost their children, but children who were themselves adopted force or at least, force from their families. Some are now adults, others have only 11 to 13 years. A raid of the police to take an infant and a maintenance of a woman pregnant with a social worker will also give an idea of the nightmarish situations generated by "child welfare". Finally we will discuss the issue of foreign children whose families, on the British territory, fell in the trap: Matilde, girl French 11 year removed with his little sister Louison in June, managed to call his father, late August - abusing his family of home - and -surveillance. It says "their life in prison", and especially request assistance to find their father and leave the England…

ivanataylor left an annotation ()

http://parentsagainstinjustice.com/pages...

Here is a case that Cumbria messed up. Where a child was suffering from OOP Bone condition and her family were falsely accused of child abuse. Thanks to american Dr's from UCSD we were vindicated yet we are still listed as child abusers on the police computer, despite never having been charged. We proved our innocence. Perhapps this is why Cumbria do not hold the information you have requested, as there is still a huge cover up