Training provisions for Academic Integrity

Rob Keasley made this Freedom of Information request to University of Sunderland Automatic anti-spam measures are in place for this older request. Please let us know if a further response is expected or if you are having trouble responding.

The request was successful.

Dear University of Sunderland,

With colleagues, I am carrying out research into the academic misconduct / integrity support provision of higher education institutions. Please respond to the following questions about your provision for students.

1). In the academic year 2022-2023:
A) How many students (institution wide) were enrolled at your institution?
B) How many academic misconduct referrals were there? (Where it is known that a student had more than one referral, please count them only once).
C) How many academic misconduct cases were substantiated? (Where it is known that a student had more than one offence, please count them only once).

2). In terms of your centralised academic success/learning enhancement services (available to all students at your institution):
Which of these descriptions best match your provision?
A) A service which is embedded within other student support services (such as international student support and disability services or ‘one-stop shop’).
B) Stand-alone provision, separate from other student support services.
C) Another method. Please specify.

3). Regarding your academic integrity / misconduct support and training for students:
Is this offered
A) In pre-arrival information?
B) During course induction following arrival?
C) Provided by individual programmes of study? If yes, approximately when do these take place in the academic year?
D) Only to students who have had an academic misconduct case proven / substantiated?
Please indicate all that apply.

4). Is there specialist academic integrity / misconduct support provided for:
A) Students completing longer form academic assignments (e.g. Final Year dissertations and extended projects)?
B) Students with a declared disability?
C) Students studying in English as an additional language?
D) International students?
Please indicate all that apply.

5). In the academic year 2022—23, how many group level academic integrity training sessions were available?

6). Is service evaluation data recorded on how many 1-1 support sessions given to students relate to issues of academic misconduct / integrity?

7). About your institution’s use of Turnitin.
A) Is Turnitin used as a pedagogical tool as part of academic integrity / misconduct training for students?
B) Do students have access to Turnitin similarity reports before final submission of work?

8). Please provide us with any examples of best practice or relevant information you would like to share on the delivery of academic misconduct / integrity support for your students.

Yours faithfully,

Rob Keasley

Sunfoi sunfoi, University of Sunderland

Dear Rob Keasley

Thank you for your request for information which was received at the University of Sunderland on 14th May 2024.

Your request is being processed under the Freedom of Information Act and the University will respond in due course.

Best wishes
Kate O'Neill

show quoted sections

Dear Kate

The response to my request has been delayed. By law, the authority should normally have responded promptly and by 12 June 2024

Yours sincerely,

Rob Keasley

Sunfoi sunfoi, University of Sunderland

Hi Rob

Please accept my apologies for the delay - I am hoping to be able to forward you the University response today.

Best wishes
Kate

show quoted sections

Sunfoi sunfoi, University of Sunderland

2 Attachments

Dear Rob Keasley

Reference Number: FOI2324/05/09

With apologies for the delay, I refer to your Freedom of Information request originally received on 14 May 2024.

Your request for information under the above legislation has now been considered. Please see response attached.

Internal Review Procedure
If you are dissatisfied with the handling of your request then you have a right to request an internal review. All such requests must be sent to us within 8 weeks and must clearly state your reference number and your reason for your request for an internal review. We will aim to respond to your request for an internal review within 20 working days of receipt. Your request for an internal review should be sent to [email address], quoting your FOI reference number.

Information Commissioners Office
Should you remain dissatisfied with the final outcome of the internal review then you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner (the “ICO”) for an independent review. The ICO is the Government’s Independent Body responsible for overseeing the Freedom of Information Act 2000, the Data Protection Act 2018 and The Environmental Information Regulations 2004. Please note the ICO will only review cases that have exhausted the University’s internal review procedure. All correspondence to the ICO must quote the University’s reference number and your reasons for your appeal. The ICO’s contact details are as follows:

The Information Commissioners Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF

More information can be found at the ICO’s website at http://www.ico.org.uk

show quoted sections