Training provisions for academic integrity
Dear St George's University of London,
With colleagues, I am carrying out research into the academic misconduct / integrity support provision of higher education institutions. Please respond to the following questions about your provision for students.
1). In the academic year 2022-2023:
A) How many students (institution wide) were enrolled at your institution?
B) How many academic misconduct referrals were there? (Where it is known that a student had more than one referral, please count them only once).
C) How many academic misconduct cases were substantiated? (Where it is known that a student had more than one offence, please count them only once).
2). In terms of your centralised academic success/learning enhancement services (available to all students at your institution):
Which of these descriptions best match your provision?
A) A service which is embedded within other student support services (such as international student support and disability services or ‘one-stop shop’).
B) Stand-alone provision, separate from other student support services.
C) Another method. Please specify.
3). Regarding your academic integrity / misconduct support and training for students:
Is this offered
A) In pre-arrival information?
B) During course induction following arrival?
C) Provided by individual programmes of study? If yes, approximately when do these take place in the academic year?
D) Only to students who have had an academic misconduct case proven / substantiated?
Please indicate all that apply.
4). Is there specialist academic integrity / misconduct support provided for:
A) Students completing longer form academic assignments (e.g. Final Year dissertations and extended projects)?
B) Students with a declared disability?
C) Students studying in English as an additional language?
D) International students?
Please indicate all that apply.
5). In the academic year 2022—23, how many group level academic integrity training sessions were available?
6). Is service evaluation data recorded on how many 1-1 support sessions given to students relate to issues of academic misconduct / integrity?
7). About your institution’s use of Turnitin.
A) Is Turnitin used as a pedagogical tool as part of academic integrity / misconduct training for students?
B) Do students have access to Turnitin similarity reports before final submission of work?
8). Please provide us with any examples of best practice or relevant information you would like to share on the delivery of academic misconduct / integrity support for your students.
Yours faithfully,
Rachel Harrad
Acknowledgement from St Georges University of London
Thank you for your email.
If you have sent us a Freedom of Information request a response will be
sent to you within twenty working days of receipt.
Best wishes.
Kirsten Hylan | Records Manager
Governance Legal & Assurance Services (GLAS)
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace | Tooting | London | SW17 0RE
+44 (0)208 725 5007
[email address]
St George’s, University of London: improving health for over 250 years
sgul.ac.uk
[City St George's, University of London (Tooting) request email]
Dear Rachel,
Thank you for your FOI request.
I'm writing to request clarification of questions 6 and 8. Are you asking
for a yes / no response as to whether or not we evaluate the service, or
do you wish to know how many sessions we have given to students?
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Sent: 21 May 2024 10:37
To: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for academic
integrity
Dear St George's University of London,
With colleagues, I am carrying out research into the academic misconduct /
integrity support provision of higher education institutions. Please
respond to the following questions about your provision for students.
1). In the academic year 2022-2023:
A) How many students (institution wide) were enrolled at your institution?
B) How many academic misconduct referrals were there? (Where it is known
that a student had more than one referral, please count them only once).
C) How many academic misconduct cases were substantiated? (Where it is
known that a student had more than one offence, please count them only
once).
2). In terms of your centralised academic success/learning enhancement
services (available to all students at your institution):
Which of these descriptions best match your provision?
A) A service which is embedded within other student support services (such
as international student support and disability services or ‘one-stop
shop’).
B) Stand-alone provision, separate from other student support services.
C) Another method. Please specify.
3). Regarding your academic integrity / misconduct support and training
for students:
Is this offered
A) In pre-arrival information?
B) During course induction following arrival?
C) Provided by individual programmes of study? If yes, approximately when
do these take place in the academic year?
D) Only to students who have had an academic misconduct case proven /
substantiated?
Please indicate all that apply.
4). Is there specialist academic integrity / misconduct support provided
for:
A) Students completing longer form academic assignments (e.g. Final Year
dissertations and extended projects)?
B) Students with a declared disability?
C) Students studying in English as an additional language?
D) International students?
Please indicate all that apply.
5). In the academic year 2022—23, how many group level academic integrity
training sessions were available?
6). Is service evaluation data recorded on how many 1-1 support sessions
given to students relate to issues of academic misconduct / integrity?
7). About your institution’s use of Turnitin.
A) Is Turnitin used as a pedagogical tool as part of academic integrity /
misconduct training for students?
B) Do students have access to Turnitin similarity reports before final
submission of work?
8). Please provide us with any examples of best practice or relevant
information you would like to share on the delivery of academic misconduct
/ integrity support for your students.
Yours faithfully,
Rachel Harrad
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #1132656 email]
Is [City St George's, University of London (Tooting) request email] the
wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to St George's
University of London? If so, please contact us using this form:
[1]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[2]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[3]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
[4]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
2. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
3. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
4. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Apologies Rachel, I hit send without completing my e-mail.
Question 6: are you asking for a yes / no response as to whether or not we
evaluate the service, or do you wish to know how many sessions we have
given to students?
Question 8: the Freedom of Information Act allows members of the public to
request recorded information held by a public authority. The public
authority is not obliged to create new information in order to respond to
a request. Would you like to leave the wording as is, or would you like
us to see if we have any reviews of the delivery of academic misconduct
services?
Once I have your reply we will start to process your request.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
Kirsten Hylan | Records Manager
Governance Legal & Assurance Services (GLAS)
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace | Tooting | London | SW17 0RE
+44 (0)208 725 5007
[1][email address]
St George’s, University of London: improving health for over 250 years
[2]sgul.ac.uk
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Sent: 21 May 2024 10:37
To: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for academic
integrity
Dear St George's University of London,
With colleagues, I am carrying out research into the academic misconduct /
integrity support provision of higher education institutions. Please
respond to the following questions about your provision for students.
1). In the academic year 2022-2023:
A) How many students (institution wide) were enrolled at your institution?
B) How many academic misconduct referrals were there? (Where it is known
that a student had more than one referral, please count them only once).
C) How many academic misconduct cases were substantiated? (Where it is
known that a student had more than one offence, please count them only
once).
2). In terms of your centralised academic success/learning enhancement
services (available to all students at your institution):
Which of these descriptions best match your provision?
A) A service which is embedded within other student support services (such
as international student support and disability services or ‘one-stop
shop’).
B) Stand-alone provision, separate from other student support services.
C) Another method. Please specify.
3). Regarding your academic integrity / misconduct support and training
for students:
Is this offered
A) In pre-arrival information?
B) During course induction following arrival?
C) Provided by individual programmes of study? If yes, approximately when
do these take place in the academic year?
D) Only to students who have had an academic misconduct case proven /
substantiated?
Please indicate all that apply.
4). Is there specialist academic integrity / misconduct support provided
for:
A) Students completing longer form academic assignments (e.g. Final Year
dissertations and extended projects)?
B) Students with a declared disability?
C) Students studying in English as an additional language?
D) International students?
Please indicate all that apply.
5). In the academic year 2022—23, how many group level academic integrity
training sessions were available?
6). Is service evaluation data recorded on how many 1-1 support sessions
given to students relate to issues of academic misconduct / integrity?
7). About your institution’s use of Turnitin.
A) Is Turnitin used as a pedagogical tool as part of academic integrity /
misconduct training for students?
B) Do students have access to Turnitin similarity reports before final
submission of work?
8). Please provide us with any examples of best practice or relevant
information you would like to share on the delivery of academic misconduct
/ integrity support for your students.
Yours faithfully,
Rachel Harrad
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #1132656 email]
Is [City St George's, University of London (Tooting) request email] the
wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to St George's
University of London? If so, please contact us using this form:
[3]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[4]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[5]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
[6]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email%20address]
2. http://www.sgul.ac.uk/
3. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
4. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
5. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
6. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
Dear Kirsten,
For question 6 we would like to know if data is recorded about how many of the sessions provided are about academic integrity / misconduct, so a yes or no.
Question 8 – apologies yes, I can see that one does fall out of scope. If you have available any reviews of the delivery of academic misconduct services that would be great.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
Dear Kirsten,
The response to my request has been delayed. By law, the authority should normally have responded promptly and by 19 June 2024
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
Dear Rachel,
Please accept me apologies for the delayed response, I was away last week
and my stand-in didn't pick up this e-mail.
I have escalated your request to our COO for resolution. Please let me
know if you would also like me to arrange for an internal review.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
Kirsten Hylan | Records Manager
Governance Legal & Assurance Services (GLAS)
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace | Tooting | London | SW17 0RE
+44 (0)208 725 5007
[1][email address]
St George’s, University of London: improving health for over 250 years
[2]sgul.ac.uk
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Sent: 20 June 2024 08:27
To: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Kirsten,
The response to my request has been delayed. By law, the authority should
normally have responded promptly and by 19 June 2024
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
Dear Rachel,
I'm writing to let you know that our COO contacted the teams responsible
for providing the information you requested however, I've yet to receive a
full response. I've asked the COO to resend the chaser.
Should you wish to request an internal review you can either let me know,
or contact the Head of Information Governance Geoffrey Gray at [1][email
address].
Again please accept my apologies for our delayed response.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Sent: 24 June 2024 15:19
To: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Rachel,
Please accept me apologies for the delayed response, I was away last week
and my stand-in didn't pick up this e-mail.
I have escalated your request to our COO for resolution. Please let me
know if you would also like me to arrange for an internal review.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
Kirsten Hylan | Records Manager
Governance Legal & Assurance Services (GLAS)
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace | Tooting | London | SW17 0RE
+44 (0)208 725 5007
[2][email address]
St George’s, University of London: improving health for over 250 years
[3]sgul.ac.uk
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Sent: 20 June 2024 08:27
To: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Kirsten,
The response to my request has been delayed. By law, the authority should
normally have responded promptly and by 19 June 2024
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
Dear Rachel,
The COO and SIRO have both sent reminders to the relevant members of staff
that the response to your FOI request is well overdue. I do have some of
the information and am happy to send that to you if you like. Please let
me know.
Once again please accept my apologies for our late response.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Sent: 01 July 2024 13:48
To: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Subject: Fw: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Rachel,
I'm writing to let you know that our COO contacted the teams responsible
for providing the information you requested however, I've yet to receive a
full response. I've asked the COO to resend the chaser.
Should you wish to request an internal review you can either let me know,
or contact the Head of Information Governance Geoffrey Gray at [1][email
address].
Again please accept my apologies for our delayed response.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Sent: 24 June 2024 15:19
To: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Rachel,
Please accept me apologies for the delayed response, I was away last week
and my stand-in didn't pick up this e-mail.
I have escalated your request to our COO for resolution. Please let me
know if you would also like me to arrange for an internal review.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
Kirsten Hylan | Records Manager
Governance Legal & Assurance Services (GLAS)
St George’s, University of London
Cranmer Terrace | Tooting | London | SW17 0RE
+44 (0)208 725 5007
[2][email address]
St George’s, University of London: improving health for over 250 years
[3]sgul.ac.uk
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Sent: 20 June 2024 08:27
To: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Subject: Re: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Kirsten,
The response to my request has been delayed. By law, the authority should
normally have responded promptly and by 19 June 2024
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
Dear Kirsten
Thanks for keeping me updated. If you could send me what you have please, that would be great.
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
Dear Rachel,
Our response to your FOI request is attached.
I was able to obtain the outstanding information today.
If you wish to make a complaint about how we have handled your query
contact details for our Head of Information Governance are contained in
the response.
Kind regards,
Kirsten
══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
From: Rachel Harrad <[FOI #1132656 email]>
Sent: 10 July 2024 08:21
To: Freedom of Information <[City St George's, University of London
(Tooting) request email]>
Subject: Re: Fw: Freedom of Information request - Training provisions for
academic integrity
Dear Kirsten
Thanks for keeping me updated. If you could send me what you have please,
that would be great.
Yours sincerely,
Rachel Harrad
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now