The Ministry of Defence's position on possible UFO crash into wind turbine at Conisholme in Lincolnshire

The request was partially successful.

Dear Sir or Madam,

I would like to know what the Ministry of Defence's position is upon the unexplained object that caused damage to the wind turbine in Lincolnshire. Has it been determined what caused the damage?

Yours faithfully,

C Bowman

Webb, Paul Mr,

Dear Mr Bowman,

Thank you for your e-mail of 9 February 2009 asking what the Ministry of
Defence's position was regarding the recent damage to a wind turbine in
Lincolnshire and whether the cause of the damage had been determined.

Firstly, it may be helpful if I explain that the Ministry of Defence (MoD)
examines any reports of `unidentified flying objects' it receives solely
to establish whether what was seen might have some defence significance;
namely, whether there is any evidence that the United Kingdom's airspace
might have been compromised by hostile or unauthorised air activity.

Unless there is evidence of a potential threat to the United Kingdom from
an external source, and to date no UFO report has revealed such evidence,
we do not attempt to identify the precise nature of each sighting reported
to us. We believe that rational explanations, such as aircraft lights or
natural phenomena, could be found for them if resources were diverted for
this purpose, but it is not the function of the MoD to provide this kind
of aerial identification service. It would be an inappropriate use of
defence resources if we were to do so.

The MoD does not have any expertise or role in respect of `UFO/flying
saucer' matters or the question of the existence or otherwise of
extraterrestrial life forms, about which it remains totally open-minded. I
should add that to date, the MoD knows of no evidence which substantiates
the existence of these alleged phenomena.

Turning to this particular incident, I can confirm that it was not
officially reported to the MoD but, clearly, we were aware of the media
reports. We are not aware of any substantive evidence to suggest the
turbine was hit by a UFO and unless we receive clear physical evidence of
an aircraft or other object flying into the turbine, we would not
investigate the matter.

I hope this is helpful.

Paul Webb

RAF Bus Sec 13

Room 2E03

Spitfire Block

HQ Air Command

RAF High Wycombe

HP14 4UE

Tel: 01494 49 6254

[1][email address]

This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or there are problems
please notify the sender and then delete the e-mail (and file(s) if
attached) from your system.
Recipients should note that e-mail traffic on MOD systems is subject to
monitoring, recording and auditing to secure the effective operation of
the system and for other lawful purposes.
The MOD has taken steps to keep this e-mail and any attachments free from
viruses. However it accepts no liability for any loss or damage howsoever
caused as a result of any virus being passed on. It is the responsibility
of the recipient to perform all necessary checks.
The statements expressed in this e-mail are personal and do not
necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the department.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

George Cant left an annotation ()

it was a uav not ufo. ( just up the road from were i fly RC planes )

They were testing a new UAV at the local firing range, It exploded and hit the turbine.

Or

they successfully landed and integrated a local agent to dismiss investigations off hand so we ( the Martians ) can build a secret intergalactic base to takeover the world.

:-}

S Goodwin left an annotation ()

Thanks Chris for your question, a good one i might add...
One other question.....The news at the time reported that the blade was to be sent to germany for testing, yet there doesnt seem to be any sign of the results or any other publicly available infomation pertaining to this...