The Duluth Model of Domestic Violence and Police Constable Training in Surrey Police

The request was successful.

Dear Surrey Police,

In which year did Surrey Police introduce ‘The Duluth Model' (also known as the ‘Domestic Abuse Intervention Program’) into the training program for police constables (PCs) within Surrey Police?

Yours faithfully,

S. Grove

!Freedom of Information (Surrey), Surrey Police


Freedom of Information: 001566/19 (TRAINING FOI)

I write to acknowledge receipt of your Freedom of Information Request

The Act requires us to respond to FOI requests within 20 working days of
receiving the request. Unfortunately, at the moment, there is likely to be
a delay in us providing you with a response. We currently have a
significant backlog which we have reported to the Information
Commissioner's Office. We are working with the ICO to reduce the delay.

I would like to apologise in advance and hope that this does not cause you
too much inconvenience.

Yours Sincerely,

Information Access Team
Surrey Police
Telephone 01483 630007

!Freedom of Information (Surrey), Surrey Police

1 Attachment



I write in connection with your request for information received on
received 02/05/2019.

You had asked:

In which year did Surrey Police introduce ‘The Duluth Model' (also known
as the ‘Domestic Abuse Intervention Program’) into the training program
for police constables (PCs) within Surrey Police?

Section 1 of the Freedom of information Act 2000 (FOIA) places two duties
on public authorities. Unless exemptions apply, the first duty at s1(1)(a)
is to confirm or deny whether the information specified within a request
is held. The second duty at s1(1)(b) is to disclose information that has
been confirmed as being held.

The information that you have requested is held by Surrey Police. Please
find our response below.




From 2016 the Domestic Abuse training package incorporated only the Duluth
‘Power and Control wheel’ model, the whole model itself is not
followed/replicated by Surrey Police.

Surrey Police provides you the right to request a re-examination of your
case under its review procedure. How to do this is set out in the attached
Appeals Notice. Having followed the full procedure, if you are still
dissatisfied, then you have the right to direct your comments to the
Information Commissioner who will give your case consideration.

I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your interest in
Surrey Police. Should you have any further enquiries concerning this
matter, please write or contact us on 01483 - 630007 quoting the reference
number above.

Yours Sincerely,

Alan Bayless
Information Access Team
Surrey Police
Telephone 01483 630007

Dear !Freedom of Information (Surrey),

Surrey Police are thanked for their full response to this FOI request.

The introduction of the "Power and Control wheel" of the Duluth Model into Surrey Police training indicates that post-modern intersectional feminist ideology has entered the Surrey Police service which may alter the way officers investigate crimes, especially crimes perpetrated by women against non-binary people, men and children.

Specifically the Duluth Model views domestic abuse as a gender-based violence by men against women and the model is not based on accurate domestic abuse statistics for example reports from the USA’s Center for Disease Control.

It is hoped that officers will not use the "Power and Control wheel" information/indoctrination as a psychological "confirmation bias" that would, for example, encourage a blindness to the abuse of males perpetrated by females (e.g. filing false police reports, metaphorically “swatting" a victim). It is also hoped that if officers believe that the Duluth Model could have contributed their "confirmation bias" that Surrey Police will respond in a timely way to DPA 2018 subject access requests or follow-up ICO complaint investigations from non-binary/male members of the public who wish to see the officer notebook entries of potentially malicious accusations/reports made against them by females (for example their historically abusive mothers).

Yours sincerely,

S. Grove