The calculation of Police Injury On Duty Pensions

The request was successful.

Dear West Midlands Police,

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 I wish to ask the
following questions in relation to the calculation process of
Police Injury On Duty Pension banding calculations.
I ask this as there appears to be different ways of calculating
this throughout the UK.

a) Is a theoretical/notional earning figure (sometimes referred to
as a Police Earnings Assessment Matrix **PEAM**) used in the
calculation of Police Injury On Duty Pensions in West Midlands?

b) Is this figure which is normally a monetary value utilised in a
formula by the Selected Medical Practioner to calculate a banding
of the injury pension.

c) If this PEAM figure is used, at what part of the process is it
used? Is it used in the initial (first) part of the injury on duty
pension assessment to use as one of the multipliers or is this used
when a review of an IOD pension is taking place?

I ask this as I am aware some Police Services throughout the UK use
this theoretical earning figure at differing parts of the process
of calculating IOD pension bandings, some use it during the very
first part of the process at the very first IOD pension assessment
and some only use it at the point of a review instigated by the IOD
pensioner or by the Police Pension administrator.

It is clear that not using this theoretical earning figure at the
very first assessment will possibly result in a higher banding with
solely the SMP disablement percentage used for the banding i.e. 25%
(band 1), 44% (band 2), 75% (band 3) & 90% (band 4).

I ask, at which point do West Midlands Police IOD pension administrator
use this theoretical earning figure and could an example of the
formula or examples of the formulas be given. Is the theoretical
figure used during the very first part of the IOD calculation or is
it only used during a review process?

Is the use of this theoretical earning figure in such calculations
lawful and what law/ legistlation/ guidance is used. If it is
lawful what law/legistlation/guidance is followed?

I understand that under The Act I am entitled to a response within
20 days working days within your receipt of this request.

If there any parts of this FOI that cannot be answered could a
reason be given for this, if my request is denied in part or fully
I respectfully request that a full explanation be given for this
and ask that any deletions are justified with reference to specific
parts of The Act.

Please acknowledge receipt of this FOI request and I look forward
to your reply in the near future.

Yours faithfully,

K T soloman

Freedom of Information,

Dear K T Soloman

 

FOI Request Reference: 000568/15

 

Thank you for your request for information, received 19/02/2015. I
apologise for the length of time it has taken to provide this response.

 

REQUEST

 

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 I wish to ask the following
questions in relation to the calculation process of Police Injury On Duty
Pension banding calculations. I ask this as there appears to be different
ways of calculating this throughout the UK.

 

a) Is a theoretical/notional earning figure (sometimes referred to as a
Police Earnings Assessment Matrix **PEAM**) used in the calculation of
Police Injury On Duty Pensions in West Midlands?

 

b) Is this figure which is normally a monetary value utilised in a formula
by the Selected Medical Practioner to calculate a banding of the injury
pension.

 

c) If this PEAM figure is used, at what part of the process is it used? Is
it used in the initial (first) part of the injury on duty pension
assessment to use as one of the multipliers or is this used

when a review of an IOD pension is taking place?

 

I ask this as I am aware some Police Services throughout the UK use this
theoretical earning figure at differing parts of the process of
calculating IOD pension bandings, some use it during the very first part
of the process at the very first IOD pension assessment and some only use
it at the point of a review instigated by the IOD pensioner or by the
Police Pension administrator.

 

It is clear that not using this theoretical earning figure at the very
first assessment will possibly result in a higher banding with solely the
SMP disablement percentage used for the banding i.e. 25% (band 1), 44%
(band 2), 75% (band 3) & 90% (band 4).

 

I ask, at which point do West Midlands Police IOD pension administrator
use this theoretical earning figure and could an example of the formula or
examples of the formulas be given. Is the theoretical figure used during
the very first part of the IOD calculation or is it only used during a
review process?

 

Is the use of this theoretical earning figure in such calculations lawful
and what law/ legistlation/ guidance is used. If it is lawful what
law/legistlation/guidance is followed?

 

I understand that under The Act I am entitled to a response within 20 days
working days within your receipt of this request.

 

If there any parts of this FOI that cannot be answered could a reason be
given for this, if my request is denied in part or fully I respectfully
request that a full explanation be given for this

and ask that any deletions are justified with reference to specific parts
of The Act.

 

Please acknowledge receipt of this FOI request and I look forward to your
reply in the near future.

 

 

RESPONSE

 

The West Midlands Police do not use a theoretical/ notional earning
figure. Pensions are informed by the level of disablement. The levels are
as follows; 25%(slight or less), 25 – 50 % (minor), 50 – 75 % (major),
over 75% (major). The disablement band is then used in conjunction with
years of service to determine the percentage of average pension-able pay
(best of the last three years) to be paid.

 

As recommended as good practice by the Information Commissioner’s Office a
version of this response may be published on the West Midlands Police
website.

 

For further information and data on West Midlands Police see our
publication scheme and disclosure log

 

[1]http://foi.west-midlands.police.uk/

 

Your attention is drawn to your right to request a re-examination of your
case under West Midlands Police review procedure, which can be found at:

 

[2]http://foi.west-midlands.police.uk/revie...

 

Please note that such an appeal must be received within six months of the
date of this correspondence.

 

If you require any further information, then please do not hesitate to
contact me.

 

Yours sincerely,

Courtney Martin
Freedom of Information Unit

Corporate Communications

 

Tel: 101

ext: 7630 3507

 

To report crime and anti-social behaviour which does not require an
emergency response please call 101. In an emergency call 999.

Website: [3]www.west-midlands.police.uk
Twitter: [4]www.twitter.com/wmpolice
Facebook: [5]www.facebook.com/westmidlandspolice
YouTube: [6]www.youtube.com/westmidlandspolice

Flickr: [7]www.flickr.com/westmidlandspolice

 

[8]View all our social network links

 

Our vision: Serving our communities, protecting them from harm

 

 

This email is intended for the addressee only and may contain privileged
or confidential information. If received in error, please notify the
originator immediately. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, copying or
alteration of this email is strictly forbidden. Views or opinions
expressed in this email do not necessarily represent those of West
Midlands Police. All West Midlands Police email activity is monitored for
virus, racist, obscene, or otherwise inappropriate activity. No
responsibility is accepted by West Midlands Police for any loss or damage
arising in any way from the receipt or use of this email.

References

Visible links
1. http://foi.west-midlands.police.uk/
2. http://foi.west-midlands.police.uk/revie...
3. https://exchange.wmpad.local/owa/redir.a...
4. https://exchange.wmpad.local/owa/redir.a...
5. https://exchange.wmpad.local/owa/redir.a...
6. https://exchange.wmpad.local/owa/redir.a...
7. https://exchange.wmpad.local/owa/redir.a...
8. https://exchange.wmpad.local/owa/redir.a...