The Anthrax Ingredients Gulf War 1990/1991

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Public Health England should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Public Health England,

I have been forwarded to yourselves from the Ministry of Defence . To answer a very simple question.

What has already been clarified is that the U.S formula was used to develope Anthrax vaccines for use on British troops specifically for the Gulf War 1999/1991 .

My simple question is ss follows...

Did the U.S also supply the anthrax bacteria or any other ingredient within that vaccine?

Please do not reply with irrelevant links to countermeasures . MOD and PortonBioPharma Ltd (only founded 2015) are claiming they do not know who supplied bacteria?

MOD have passed the buck onto yourselves to answer this question.

Of course this information is known,
as every single detail would be recorded, due to the significance surrounding the vaccine, prior to, during and post Gulf War 90/91 and the autoimmune sickness suffered by troops since. Not knowing would be the Negligence in the highest Order against British Troops. Also not allowing the freedom of this information, would mean breaking the Law of the individual and or dept dealing with this very simple and straight forward request request.

Here is hoping finally, we receive an honest and transparent answer, as we do not wish to Subpoena current dept staff responsible for these replys if the simple information is not forth coming!

Regards,

gavin roberts

FOI, Public Health England

OFFICIAL
Dear Mr Roberts

We acknowledge receipt of your email and request for information, which will be treated as a request for information under statutory access legislation.

Please note that requests under the Freedom of Information Act and the Environmental Information Regulations (EIRs) will receive a response within 20 working days from the day following the date of receipt of your request.

If the request is for your personal data (i.e. a Subject Access Request) under the Data Protection Act, then we will respond  within one month of the receipt of the request.

Public Accountability Unit
Public Health England
[PHE request email]
Tel: 020 8327 6920 
www.gov.uk/phe   Follow us on Twitter @PHE uk

show quoted sections

FOI, Public Health England

1 Attachment

OFFICIAL

Dear Mr Roberts

Please find attached Public Health England’s response to your request for information.

Kind regards,
FOI Team

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,

Thankyou for your reply and efforts,
this leaves MOD with a bit of problem, as without knowing the origin of the ingredients/bacteria specifically for the Anthrax developed for the Gulf War 90/91 as MOD are claiming, it is simply impossible for them to make the claim that the Anthrax did not cause gulf war illnesses/autoimmune conditions amongst our suffering troops!

Would you just like to double check, especially as MOD would like us to believe every stone was turned!

Regards,

gavin roberts

FOI, Public Health England

OFFICIAL
Dear Mr Roberts

Thank you for your email. PHE have nothing to add to our earlier response.

Under our Section 16 duty to provide advice and assistance I have signposted you to the Gov/MoD position on risk from vaccines / NAPS etc. is documented at;
https://www.gov.uk/guidance/gulf-veteran...

Kind regards
FOI Team

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,

Thankyou for your reply, we have evidence that the vaccines/combinations that were tested post Gulf War on only animals, were NOT the same as given to our troops. The Anthrax vaccine being 1 of them developed specifically using the United States Formula, whom also supplied the plague vaccine!

The information you are linking us to has no bearing, apart from misleading the public!

The fact that 39 Nations were involved in the Gulf War and only 5 of those Nations have suffered epedemic levels of autoimmune conditions. The same 5 Nations that subjected its troops to experimental multiple vaccine combinations also speaks for itself!

It is damning!

So if you could please release the correct data surrounding the vaccine ingredient supplies without misleading the public as well as veterans it would be
appreciated, as we do not wish to land the current adninistration into contempt for past administrations fraudulent activity through a subpoena.

Throughout this question from the start
You are not answering it. You are changing it and then answering your own question! By doing so throughout.
You are breaking the law!

In the first instance i will put it back to you . WHO supplied the bacteria and other ingredients to develope the U.S formula Anthrax for the Gulf War 90/91.

Please enjoy your Xmas and New Year
before responding with honesty and transparency.

Regards,

gavin roberts.

FOI, Public Health England

OFFICIAL
Dear Gavin Roberts,

We acknowledge receipt of your email and request for information, which will be treated as a request for information under statutory access legislation.

Please note that requests under the Freedom of Information Act and the Environmental Information Regulations (EIRs) will receive a response within 20 working days from the day following the date of receipt of your request.

If the request is for your personal data (i.e. a Subject Access Request) under the Data Protection Act, then we will respond  within one month of the receipt of the request.
Public Accountability Unit
Public Health England
[PHE request email]
Tel: 020 8327 6920 
www.gov.uk/phe   Follow us on Twitter @PHE uk

show quoted sections

FOI, Public Health England

1 Attachment

Dear Gavin Roberts,

Please find attached Public Health England's response to your request.

Kind regards,

FOI Team

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,

To continually pass us off to these, links that do not answer the question, but only smokescreen the truth is not only dis-respectful to veterans, it is fraudulant! We already have the evidence that the vaccines in the research, post Gulf War, were not the same as during the war. To keep linking people to untruths is Corruption!

Do you guys even think whilst you are replying, youre telling me you hold no data surrounding Gulf Anthrax vaccine, then send me to a link where it desribes how the vaccines were retested (i reiterate, we already have the evidence that they were not the same vaccines)

Maybe i should remind you that 36 Nations deployed to the Gulf, 5 of those Nations subjected its troops to Experimental multiple and untested combinations of vaccine regime!

5 of the these 36 nations troops are suffering epedemic autoimmune conditions, cancers, whether they were on the ground, in the air or at sea! Or have passed away suffering!

Yes the same 5 Nations that were subjected to the vaccines. So lets stop leading veterans down the garden path, as you are being complicit to the corruption that has gone before you. The links are false data, when no data exists any where surrounding the Anthrax subjected to our troops. That should give you an idea of the corruption we are dealing with here.

Regards

Gavin Roberts

FOI, Public Health England

Dear Gavin Roberts,

We acknowledge receipt of your email, which will be treated as a request for an internal review, following your requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Please note we aim to complete your internal review within 20 working days from the day following the date of receipt of your request. We will notify you if we anticipate the internal review taking longer than 20 working days.

Kind Regards,

FOI Team
Public Accountability Unit
Public Health England
[PHE request email]
Tel: 020 8327 6920 
www.gov.uk/phe   Follow us on Twitter @PHE uk

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,

Your internal review will only state that you have carried out the correct process. If data is not there, where is it? How can it disappear. The most Controversial vaccine ever given to our troops and MOD has lost the data? We have established that it was not the same Anthrax used in UK prior to the Gulf War 90/91. We have also established that is not the same Anthrax used in UK post Gulf War 90/91. This requires more than an internal review. It is corruption. Do not become complicit with the previous administrations (91 - ?) Cover Ups. You guys are now (possibly unaware)carrying the corruption can! Now you are aware, if it carries on. You are complicit!
Please be warned. Subpoena's will be sought where necessary!

Regards
gavin roberts

FOI, Public Health England

Dear Gavin Roberts,

Thank you for your email which has been, duly, noted.

Yours sincerely,

FOI Team
Public Accountability Unit
Public Health England
[PHE request email]
Tel: 020 8327 6920
www.gov.uk/phe Follow us on Twitter @PHE uk

show quoted sections

FOI, Public Health England

1 Attachment

  • Attachment

    1045 IR linked to Case ref 902 750 Origin of ingredients developed for Anthrax for 199091 Gulf War.pdf

    218K Download View as HTML

Dear Mr Roberts,

Please find attached Public Health England's response to your internal review.

Kind regards,

FOI Team
Public Accountability Unit
Public Health England
[PHE request email]
Tel: 020 8327 6920 
www.gov.uk/phe   Follow us on Twitter @PHE uk

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,

It is quite obvious why MOD keeps refering to vaccines produced in the 1950's which can ONLY confuse people viewing in the public domain. As MOD have clearly stated a number of times they have NO DATA surrounding the Anthrax Vaccine specifically produced for the Gulf War 90/91. Only that they used the same formula as the U.S. did for Desert Storm.

There is no data surrounding the MOST controversial vaccine ever subjected to our troops? Not a single department has the data surrounding the ingredients? This maybe true, but surely the question everybody should be asking is why not? Especially as the finger is pointed at that vaccine for at least part of the cause of sickness in our Gulf War troops!
It is claimed Porton Down carried out tests with the vaccine post Gulf War to prove it's safety? and now there is no data surrounding it? Do MOD believe Veterans were born yesterday! This may have washed 25 years ago! Not now. I take it MOD will realise the problem they have got surrounding this information? It is simply not good enough to say sorry we've lost the data!

Of course this be will taken this to every level required, to receive the truth and justice for these veterans! Current MOD administration have the opportunity to do the same. Current MOD are relying on old information from over 20 years ago. We are giving them current information. There must be a single person within MOD that cares more than a single iota for these veterans? Please do not thank Veterans for their Service and inform that they might be able to compensation, if they were to beg their perpetrator (MOD) for support. It is the biggest Insult you can pay them! On the same level as sending the rape victim to the rapist for support! Yes this is going to every level necessary to get justice for these veterans. I suggest current MOD come clean, because every single MOD member will be hauled before the courts, if you/they decide to become complicit, by Covering Up the Corruption of the past. These Veterans will always be honourable, truthful and transparent! If only MOD will find 1% of their courage to come clean. We can guarantee that every single person involved in this corruption(including recent foi replyees) will be hauled before the courts! Just think about that before you type what you're told to type!

Have a good day

Regards,

gavin roberts on behalf of
justice4veterans
J4V