Suicides as a result of unlawful removal of children

Waiting for an internal review by Nottingham City Council of their handling of this request.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please provide details of recorded suicides of natural parents and minors as a result or following unlawful removal of minors to Local Authority Care over the past fourteen years.

Yours faithfully,

James Moore

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

1 Attachment

Dear Sir,

Please see the attached acknowledgement of your request under the Freedom of Information Act.

Sincerely,



Glenn E. Estes

Glenn E. Estes
Information Governance Case Administrator
Tel: 0115 9154708

show quoted sections

Ms Wilson (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Watch the CON-servative party and others appear to come to the rescue and raise this issue suddenly next year in order to get more votes. Dont be fooled they are all defacto and in this up to their necks and will use any issue to fool the sheeple.

What are any of them doing about this NOW - NOTHING

Ms Chadwick (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

Brian Gerrish

Presentation: Child Stealing by the State

Uncovering a conspiracy between public authorities, Social Services, the Police, courts and Government to unlawfully take children from their parents, and pass them into a frightening and often abusive Social Services system. This system is so powerful that local councillors cannot challenge their own Social Services departments about their actions.

Synopsis

In Britain today, a secret court system is stealing and trafficking people’s children. The author Jack Frost summed it up in his book “Gulag of the Family Courts”. Other journalists have described it as – “Child Stealing by the State”.

When a small community newspaper, ‘the UK Column’, was set up in Plymouth to expose massive public sector fraud and corruption, the volunteers had no idea of what was to come. They were shocked at reports of child stealing sent in by parents from across Britain.

In the beginning it was hard to accept some stories as true. Some mothers and fathers appeared traumatised. Could their claims be believed? And then the first mother with evidence arrived in the UK Column office. Ring files of letters, emails and court documentation. The evidence was overwhelming – lies, false evidence, perjury, false psychiatric assessments, kidnapping, psychological pressure, police threats, blatant collusion of defence and prosecution legal teams against the parent, failure to prosecute the perpetrators of medical incompetence and child abuse, and blatant victimisation of the innocent parent – the mother.

Most distressing of all was that the courts had taken absolutely no notice of the child’s own wishes - there existed a brutal conspiracy between public authorities, Social Services, the Police, courts and Government. That conspiracy still exists, and so does the evidence.

In the latest case brought to the UK Column, a young Down’s syndrome girl was repeatedly raped and abused, causing physical injury. The abusers were known and identified by the girl, but no charges were ever brought. Instead her mother who fought to protect her daughter and seek justice was committed to a psychiatric unit. Are these cases mistakes, or failures of the care and family court system? The facts suggest otherwise, and they are reinforced by ‘template’ cases reported from across the UK, Europe and the USA. The events are planned and orchestrated, with support and common purpose at the highest levels.

Within secret family courts, under the total control of a single Judge, who knowingly or unknowingly relies on false evidence, children are being unlawfully taken from their parents, and are passed into a frightening and often abusive Social Services system. This system is so powerful and secretive that not even elected councillors can challenge the actions of their own Local Authority Social Services department. The child snatch cases are gagged under family court confidentiality rules and data protection. The victimised parents and children are denied justice in a corrupt and circular appeal process, which is also held in secret.

In helping parents and children tell their stories, the UK Column has received no less than four injunctions, preventing detailed reporting. In one recent court case, regarded by those present as biased against the mother, the court used the Peter Wright MI5 ‘Spycatcher’ official secrets act case as the precedence case to prevent the mother publishing her story of child kidnap. When other parents reported that SS officials were like emotionless ‘little robots’, the truth began to unfold. Hear the full truth at AVIII.

Dear Information Governance,

You are now in violation of Statute having not replied to my FOI in a timely manner. Please forward my request to the Internal Reviewing Officer, a copy of this thread is also being forwarded to the ICO.

Yours sincerely,

James Moore

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

1 Attachment

Dear Mr. Moore,

Please find attached our response to your recent request for information.

Please note that this Authority is not outside of its statutory deadline
for responding to your request therefore I am not processing your request
for an internal review of our "...violation of Statute..." as none has
occurred.

For your information your request was received by this Authority on the
02/11/09 (the first working day following your sending of the request on
Sunday 1/11/09). Please note, requests can only be classed as received on
a working day and the deadline (20 working days following the date of
receipt) is calculated on the basis of the date the request is determined
to be received.

I trust the above is clear.

Regards,

Andrew Goodfellow

Senior Information Governance Officer

Information Governance

Nottingham City Council

Tel: 0115 9154989

Support Nottingham's bid to be a 2018 FIFA World Cup Host City. Just text
nott to 62018 or visit [1]www.england2018bid.com

show quoted sections

This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may
contain personal views which are not the views of
Nottingham City Council unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in error, please delete it from
your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information
in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
immediately. Please note that Nottingham City Council
monitors e-mails sent or received for the purposes of
ensuring compliance with its policies and procedures.
Further communication will signify your consent to this.
The contents of e-mails sent or received may have to be
disclosed if a relevant request is made under current
legislation, such as, but not limited to, the Data Protection
Act 1998 and the Freedom of Information Act 2000

References

Visible links
1. http://www.england2018bid.com/

James Moore left an annotation ()

the law says "20 days" meaning CAENDAR DAYS. If it meant WORKING DAYS it would SAY "WORKING DAYS".

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

Dear Mr. Moore, I would draw your attention to section 10(1) of the
Freedom of Information Act 2000 which deals the time for compliance
with a request.

This section states, and I quote;

"...a public authority must comply with section 1(1)...not later
than the twentieth working day following the date of receipt."

I hope that clarifies matters for you. If you require any further
advice regarding the Freedom of Information Act or other related
legislation I would suggest you seek your own legal advice.

Regards,

Andrew Goodfellow Senior Information Governance Officer Nottingham
City Council

James Moore left an annotation ()

if you want to get really pedantic, the Jobcentre expects its clients to be available for work 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The difference between 2 and 30 is 28. That's 8 days over. Take off two days out of every seven if you want to go for a five day week, you're still left with twenty days. You're still late.

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

Dear Mr. Moore,

I would strongly recommend that you examine the Freedom of
Information Act 2000 for the definition of 'working day' that is in
use here.

We will not be entering into any further correspondence on this
matter.

Kind regards,

Andrew Goodfellow Senior Information Governance Officer Nottingham
City Council

James Moore left an annotation ()

DODGED.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Nottingham City Council's handling of my FOI request 'Suicides as a result of unlawful removal of children'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/su...

Yours faithfully,

James Moore

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

Dear Mr. Moore,

Thank you for your request for an internal review I would like to draw your attention to the final paragraph of our original response letter to you dated 30th November 2009 which states that in order to conduct an internal review we require that you state "...the reasons for your dissatisfaction..." with our response.

Until we receive this information we will be unable to process your request for an internal review.

I trust the above is clear and expect to hear from you in due course.


Glenn E. Estes
Information Governance Case Administrator
Tel: 0115 9154708

show quoted sections

Dear Information Governance,

I wish to reiterate my original request and make an official complaint into the conduct of the individual who identifies himself as Andrew Goodfellow Senior Information Governance Officer Nottingham City Council. He is a pedant and basically unprofessional and wholly unsuited, in my opinion, for his position without a period of interpersonal training.

My FOI request was originally made 1 November 2009. The statutory period expired 28 November 2009 as indicated by the email I got from www.whatdotheyknow.com on that day, hence I posted the warning. He should have complained to WDTK instead of sounding off to me like I was a five year old.

Yours sincerely,

James Moore

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

Re: Your request for an internal review of your request.

Thank you for your email dated 1st December 2009.

Please note that Nottingham City Council do not respond to Freedom of Information requests with opinion nor do we respond to questions which ask for opinions.

On the matter of your official complaint, please see the attached leaflet for the proper procedure to follow. It is imperative that official complaints of employee conduct are dealt with separately from the Information Governance process.

In regard to the internal review you requested I note that you have not yet pointed out which part of the response you wish to have reviewed. Once you have done so I will pass that information and the relevant paperwork to Mrs Stephanie Pearson who as noted in the response letter which was sent is the officer responsible for reviewing all appeals under FOIA.

If an internal review is required a response will be sent to you as soon as possible and in any case within the statutory deadline which is 20 working days starting the working day after this authority receive the clarification I have asked for.



Glenn E. Estes

Glenn E. Estes
Information Governance Case Administrator
Tel: 0115 9154708

show quoted sections

Information Governance, Nottingham City Council

1 Attachment

Glenn E. Estes

Glenn E. Estes
Information Governance Case Administrator
Tel: 0115 9154708

show quoted sections