Section 106 and Section 278 funds

Darryl Chamberlain made this Freedom of Information request to Greenwich Borough Council

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was successful.

Darryl Chamberlain

Dear Greenwich Borough Council,

Could you please tell me:

a) Which developments have met the criteria for Section 106 payments in financial years 2011/12, 2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16.

b) How much was agreed for each development in Section 106 payments.

c) For each development, how much money has been spent, and the specific projects the money has been allocated to (for example, £73, 119 has gone from 50 Abbey Wood Road to the Greenwich Trust School project).

Many thanks for your help in this matter.

Yours faithfully,

Darryl Chamberlain

foi, Greenwich Borough Council

Dear Mr Chamberlain

Freedom of Information/Environmental Information Regulations request: 
FOI-1415

Thank you for your request dated 14 October 2016

Your request will be answered by 11 November 2016

If you have any queries about this request, please contact me, quoting the
reference number above.

Yours sincerely,

David White

FOI Manager
Directorate of Central Services
Royal Borough of Greenwich

LGC Council of the Year 2013

' 020 8921 3943 
* Woolwich Centre, 35 Wellington Street, Woolwich, London SE18 6PW
8 [1]www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk  

 

 

 

show quoted sections

foi, Greenwich Borough Council

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Chamberlain

Freedom of Information request FOI-1415

Thank you for your email dated 14th October 2016 in which you asked:

Could you please tell me:

a) Which developments have met the criteria for Section 106 payments in financial years 2011/12, 2012/13, 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16.

b) How much was agreed for each development in Section 106 payments.

c) For each development, how much money has been spent, and the specific projects the money has been allocated to (for example, £73, 119 has gone from 50 Abbey Wood Road to the Greenwich Trust School project).

Please see the attached spreadsheet which by financial year confirms the money that was received, and of this money how much has been spent and what it has been spent on.

If you have any queries about this correspondence, please contact me, quoting the reference number above.
If you are not satisfied with our response to your request, you can ask for an Internal Review. Internal review requests should be submitted within two months of the date of receipt of the response to your original request. If you wish to do this, please contact us, setting out why you are dissatisfied.
If you are not satisfied with the outcome of the Internal Review, you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner (ICO) for a decision. Generally, the ICO cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted the Internal Review procedure provided by the Council.

Yours sincerely,

David White
FOI Manager
Directorate of Central Services
Royal Borough of Greenwich
LGC Council of the Year 2013
 020 8921 3943
 Woolwich Centre, 35 Wellington Street, Woolwich, London SE18 6PW
www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Darryl Chamberlain

Dear Mr White,

Many thanks for this - I appreciate the work that must have gone into this.

Could I just clarify one thing? Does "n/a" mean the money was not or has not yet been spent?

Yours sincerely,

Darryl Chamberlain

foi, Greenwich Borough Council

Dear Mr Chamberlain,

Thank you for your follow-up email as detailed below.

I can confirm that where 'N/A' is used, it means 'Not Applicable'. This is due to any money received, not yet being spent, so there is no information available.

I hope this has helped to clarify matters.

Yours sincerely,

David White
FOI Manager
Directorate of Central Services
Royal Borough of Greenwich
LGC Council of the Year 2013
020 8921 3943
Woolwich Centre, 35 Wellington Street, Woolwich, London SE18 6PW
www.royalgreenwich.gov.uk

show quoted sections

Darryl Chamberlain

Dear Mr White,

Thanks for your response - it certainly does clarify matters. Thanks again for this.

Yours sincerely,

Darryl Chamberlain