S167 List of Accessible Taxis: update after 6 months - D previously undecided

The request was successful.

Dear Rossendale Borough Council,

I am writing this Freedom of Information Request in relation to your Council's compliance or otherwise with the Government's statutory guidance on implementation of S165-167 of the Equality Act, relating to taxi services for wheelchair users. All taxi licensing bodies are obliged under S167(6) to have "due regard" to the document "Access for wheelchair users to taxis and private hire vehicles: statutory guidance" at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/sy... . The questions I raise below should be interpreted as requests for recorded information under the Freedom of Information Act.

I have previously made a similar request to you in April 2017. 6+ months later, I am repeating the request with some variations. I am repeating because the Statutory Guidance states "We would expect these arrangements to take no more than a maximum of six months to put in place, following the commencement of these provisions" - "these provisions" having been commenced on 6th April.

In response to my previous FOI request on similar matters in April 2017, you indicated that you did not have a Section 167 list and were currently undecided whether to create such a list.

1) The Government guidance states: "Whilst LAs are under no specific legal obligation to maintain a list under section 167, the Government recommends strongly that they do so. Without such a list the requirements of section 165 of the Act do not apply, and drivers may continue to refuse the carriage of wheelchair users, fail to provide them with assistance, or to charge them extra."
Please can you indicate whether you have changed your position since April, such that you do now have a list of wheelchair accessible taxis under your powers set out in Section 167 of the Equality Act 2010, and/or a list of wheelchair accessible private hire vehicles?

2) If you do now have such a list, please provide information in response to the following questions 2a) to 2j):
2a) On what date was it put in place?
2b) The statutory guidance states "The Government therefore recommends that a vehicle should only be included in the authority’s (S167) list if it would be possible for the user of a “reference wheelchair” to enter, leave and travel in the passenger compartment in safety and reasonable comfort whilst seated in their wheelchair."
Is this the definition you have used for a taxi or PHV to be considered wheelchair accessible for the purposes of the list?

2c) The statutory guidance states: "Before drivers can be subject to the duties under section 165 of the Act, the LA must first publish their list of designated vehicles, and clearly mark it as ‘designated for the purposes of section 165 of the Act’. LAs should ensure that their designated lists are made easily available to passengers, and that vehicle owners and drivers are made aware. Lists should set out the details of the make and model of the vehicle, together with specifying whether the vehicle is a taxi or private hire vehicle, and stating the name of operator."
Have you published your list? Is it marked "designated for the purposes of Section 165 of the Act"? Is the make and model of each vehicle listed? Is each vehicle identified as a taxi or a private hire vehicle? Is the name of the operator of each vehicle given in the list? Have you made owners and drivers of vehicles on the list aware that their vehicle has been listed?

2d) The guidance states: "it would also be helpful to include information about the size and weight of wheelchair that can be accommodated, and whether wheelchairs that are larger than a “reference wheelchair” can be accommodated."
Does your list include information on each vehicle as to the size and weight of wheelchair that can be accommodated, and whether wheelchairs larger than a "reference wheelchair" can be accommodated?

2e) The guidance states: "We encourage LAs to provide drivers of taxis and PHVs who are not exempt from the duties with clear guidance on their duties with respect to the carriage of passengers in wheelchairs, either as part of existing driver-facing guidance, or as supplementary communication."
Have you provided non-exempt taxi/PHV drivers with such guidance?

2f) The guidance states: "We recommend that licensing authority rules for drivers are updated to make clear when a meter can and cannot be left running".
Have you updated such rules to make this clear?

2g) The guidance states: "Section 172 of the Act enables vehicle owners to appeal against the decision of a LA to include their vehicles on the designated list. That appeal should be made to the Magistrate’s Court, or in Scotland the sheriff, and must be made within 28 days of the vehicle in question being included on the LA’s published list."
Please tell me how many such applications have been made to the Magistrates Court, and how many have been successful.

2h) How many drivers has the authority prosecuted for discriminatory behaviour contrary to S165 of the Act? How many such prosecutions were successful? What were the sentences?

2i) How many drivers licensed by yourselves have been prosecuted by other people or bodies for failure to comply with S165 of the Act? How many such prosecutions were successful? What were the sentences?

2j) Where drivers have been prosecuted under S165 of the Act, thus affecting their standing as a "fit and proper person", what resultant disciplinary action have you taken in respect of their taxi or private hire vehicle drivers' licenses?

3) If you do not have a S167 list or lists now, please indicate if you now intend to produce such a list.

4) If you don't have a S167 list but do intend to produce one, please provide information in response to questions 4a) and 4b) below.
4a) Please indicate when you intend to have the list in place.
4b) Where you have already made relevant decisions, please indicate whether you intend to comply with the elements of the statutory guidance set out in 2b) to 2f) above.

5) Irrespective of whether you have created a list or not or indeed whether you intend to create such a list, since 2010 you have been obliged to process applications under Section 166 of the Equality Act for driver medical exemptions from the duty to transport and not discriminate against wheelchair users. The Guidance states; "the Act allows LAs to grant exemptions from the duties to individual drivers. These provisions are contained in section 166, and were commenced on 1st October 2010."

5a) How many exemptions have you granted under S166 of the Equality Act 2010?

5b) The guidance states: "We understand that some licensing authorities have already put in place procedures for accessing and exempting drivers, and as an absolute minimum, we think that the evidence provided should be in the form of a letter or report from a general practitioner."
Do you accept or require a letter or report from a GP to process applications for driver exemption under S166?

5c) The guidance states: "The Government’s view is that decisions on exemptions will be fairer and more objective if medical assessments are undertaken by professionals who have been specifically trained and who are independent of the applicant. We would recommend that independent medical assessors are used where a long-term exemption is to be issued, and that LAs use assessors who hold appropriate professional qualifications and who are not open to bias because of a personal or commercial connection to the applicant"
Have you appointed independent medical assessors to determine applications for medical exemption under S166?

5d) Please provide a copy of your application form for driver exemption under S166.

5e) The guidance states: "Section 172 of the Act enables drivers to appeal against the decision of a LA not to issue an exemption certificate. That appeal should be made to the Magistrate’s Court, or a sheriff in Scotland, and must be made within 28 days beginning with the date of the refusal."
How many appeals against refusal to issue S166 exemptions have been heard?

5f) How many appeals against refusal to issue S166 exemptions were successful?

6) The guidance states: "We would therefore recommend that LAs also publish a list of vehicles that are accessible to passengers in wheelchairs who are able to transfer from their wheelchair into a seat within the vehicle. It should be made clear however that this list of vehicles has not been published for the purposes of section 165 of the Act and drivers of those vehicles are therefore not subject to the legal duties to provide assistance."
Do you currently publish a list of vehicles that are accessible to passengers in wheelchairs who are able to transfer from their wheelchairs into a seat within the vehicle?

Thank you

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

Freedom Of Information, Rossendale Borough Council

1 Attachment

Good Morning

 

RE: Request for Information under the Freedom of Information Act

Logged as our Reference FOI/5664

 

I acknowledge receipt of your request dated 04.11.2017.  Your request is
being dealt with under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000
and will be answered within twenty working days.

 

Please remember to quote the above reference number in any future
communications.

Regards

 

Joanna Wood

Committee and Members Services Officer

Rossendale Borough Council

Committee and Member Services¦ Room 213 ¦The Business Centre¦Futures Park

Bacup¦Lancashire¦OL13 0BB

Tel: 01706 252426

Email: [1][email address]

 

Web: [2]www.rossendale.gov.uk

Twitter: [3]@RossendaleBC

Facebook: [4]Rossendale Borough Council

Visit Rossendale: [5]http://www.visitrossendale.com/

 

[6]cid:image001.jpg@01D32E0B.3C5FB6E0

 

 

 

From: Doug Paulley [mailto:[FOI #443060 email]]
Sent: 04 November 2017 02:16
To: Freedom Of Information
Subject: Freedom of Information request - S167 List of Accessible Taxis:
update after 6 months - D previously undecided

 

Dear Rossendale Borough Council,

I am writing this Freedom of Information Request in relation to your
Council's compliance or otherwise with the Government's statutory guidance
on implementation of S165-167 of the Equality Act, relating to taxi
services for wheelchair users. All taxi licensing bodies are obliged under
S167(6) to have "due regard" to the document "Access for wheelchair users
to taxis and private hire vehicles: statutory guidance" at
[7]https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/sy...
. The questions I raise below should be interpreted as requests for
recorded information under the Freedom of Information Act.

I have previously made a similar request to you in April 2017. 6+ months
later, I am repeating the request with some variations. I am repeating
because the Statutory Guidance states "We would expect these arrangements
to take no more than a maximum of six months to put in place, following
the commencement of these provisions" - "these provisions" having been
commenced on 6th April.

In response to my previous FOI request on similar matters in April 2017,
you indicated that you did not have a Section 167 list and were currently
undecided whether to create such a list.

1) The Government guidance states: "Whilst LAs are under no specific legal
obligation to maintain a list under section 167, the Government recommends
strongly that they do so. Without such a list the requirements of section
165 of the Act do not apply, and drivers may continue to refuse the
carriage of wheelchair users, fail to provide them with assistance, or to
charge them extra."
Please can you indicate whether you have changed your position since
April, such that you do now have a list of wheelchair accessible taxis
under your powers set out in Section 167 of the Equality Act 2010, and/or
a list of wheelchair accessible private hire vehicles?

2) If you do now have such a list, please provide information in response
to the following questions 2a) to 2j):
2a) On what date was it put in place?
2b) The statutory guidance states "The Government therefore recommends
that a vehicle should only be included in the authority’s (S167) list if
it would be possible for the user of a “reference wheelchair” to enter,
leave and travel in the passenger compartment in safety and reasonable
comfort whilst seated in their wheelchair."
Is this the definition you have used for a taxi or PHV to be considered
wheelchair accessible for the purposes of the list?

2c) The statutory guidance states: "Before drivers can be subject to the
duties under section 165 of the Act, the LA must first publish their list
of designated vehicles, and clearly mark it as ‘designated for the
purposes of section 165 of the Act’. LAs should ensure that their
designated lists are made easily available to passengers, and that vehicle
owners and drivers are made aware. Lists should set out the details of the
make and model of the vehicle, together with specifying whether the
vehicle is a taxi or private hire vehicle, and stating the name of
operator."
Have you published your list? Is it marked "designated for the purposes of
Section 165 of the Act"? Is the make and model of each vehicle listed? Is
each vehicle identified as a taxi or a private hire vehicle? Is the name
of the operator of each vehicle given in the list? Have you made owners
and drivers of vehicles on the list aware that their vehicle has been
listed?

2d) The guidance states: "it would also be helpful to include information
about the size and weight of wheelchair that can be accommodated, and
whether wheelchairs that are larger than a “reference wheelchair” can be
accommodated."
Does your list include information on each vehicle as to the size and
weight of wheelchair that can be accommodated, and whether wheelchairs
larger than a "reference wheelchair" can be accommodated?

2e) The guidance states: "We encourage LAs to provide drivers of taxis and
PHVs who are not exempt from the duties with clear guidance on their
duties with respect to the carriage of passengers in wheelchairs, either
as part of existing driver-facing guidance, or as supplementary
communication."
Have you provided non-exempt taxi/PHV drivers with such guidance?

2f) The guidance states: "We recommend that licensing authority rules for
drivers are updated to make clear when a meter can and cannot be left
running".
Have you updated such rules to make this clear?

2g) The guidance states: "Section 172 of the Act enables vehicle owners to
appeal against the decision of a LA to include their vehicles on the
designated list. That appeal should be made to the Magistrate’s Court, or
in Scotland the sheriff, and must be made within 28 days of the vehicle in
question being included on the LA’s published list."
Please tell me how many such applications have been made to the
Magistrates Court, and how many have been successful.

2h) How many drivers has the authority prosecuted for discriminatory
behaviour contrary to S165 of the Act? How many such prosecutions were
successful? What were the sentences?

2i) How many drivers licensed by yourselves have been prosecuted by other
people or bodies for failure to comply with S165 of the Act? How many such
prosecutions were successful? What were the sentences?

2j) Where drivers have been prosecuted under S165 of the Act, thus
affecting their standing as a "fit and proper person", what resultant
disciplinary action have you taken in respect of their taxi or private
hire vehicle drivers' licenses?

3) If you do not have a S167 list or lists now, please indicate if you now
intend to produce such a list.

4) If you don't have a S167 list but do intend to produce one, please
provide information in response to questions 4a) and 4b) below.
4a) Please indicate when you intend to have the list in place.
4b) Where you have already made relevant decisions, please indicate
whether you intend to comply with the elements of the statutory guidance
set out in 2b) to 2f) above.

5) Irrespective of whether you have created a list or not or indeed
whether you intend to create such a list, since 2010 you have been obliged
to process applications under Section 166 of the Equality Act for driver
medical exemptions from the duty to transport and not discriminate against
wheelchair users. The Guidance states; "the Act allows LAs to grant
exemptions from the duties to individual drivers. These provisions are
contained in section 166, and were commenced on 1st October 2010."

5a) How many exemptions have you granted under S166 of the Equality Act
2010?

5b) The guidance states: "We understand that some licensing authorities
have already put in place procedures for accessing and exempting drivers,
and as an absolute minimum, we think that the evidence provided should be
in the form of a letter or report from a general practitioner."
Do you accept or require a letter or report from a GP to process
applications for driver exemption under S166?

5c) The guidance states: "The Government’s view is that decisions on
exemptions will be fairer and more objective if medical assessments are
undertaken by professionals who have been specifically trained and who are
independent of the applicant. We would recommend that independent medical
assessors are used where a long-term exemption is to be issued, and that
LAs use assessors who hold appropriate professional qualifications and who
are not open to bias because of a personal or commercial connection to the
applicant"
Have you appointed independent medical assessors to determine applications
for medical exemption under S166?

5d) Please provide a copy of your application form for driver exemption
under S166.

5e) The guidance states: "Section 172 of the Act enables drivers to appeal
against the decision of a LA not to issue an exemption certificate. That
appeal should be made to the Magistrate’s Court, or a sheriff in Scotland,
and must be made within 28 days beginning with the date of the refusal."
How many appeals against refusal to issue S166 exemptions have been heard?

5f) How many appeals against refusal to issue S166 exemptions were
successful?

6) The guidance states: "We would therefore recommend that LAs also
publish a list of vehicles that are accessible to passengers in
wheelchairs who are able to transfer from their wheelchair into a seat
within the vehicle. It should be made clear however that this list of
vehicles has not been published for the purposes of section 165 of the Act
and drivers of those vehicles are therefore not subject to the legal
duties to provide assistance."
Do you currently publish a list of vehicles that are accessible to
passengers in wheelchairs who are able to transfer from their wheelchairs
into a seat within the vehicle?

Thank you

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[8][FOI #443060 email]

Is [9][Rossendale Borough Council request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to Rossendale Borough Council? If so, please contact us using
this form:
[10]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[11]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[12]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.rossendale.gov.uk/
3. https://twitter.com/RossendaleBC
4. https://www.facebook.com/RossendaleCouncil
5. http://www.visitrossendale.com/
6. http://www.r-awards.co.uk/
7. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/sy...
8. mailto:[FOI #443060 email]
9. mailto:[Rossendale Borough Council request email]
10. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
11. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
12. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Freedom Of Information, Rossendale Borough Council

2 Attachments

Good Morning

 

Freedom of Information Request – FOI/5664

 

With reference to your request dated 04.11.2017 the Council’s response is
attached.

 

Right to Review

 

If you wish to request a review of your response, please contact Mrs Clare
Birtwistle, Legal Services Manager, Rossendale Borough Council, The
Business Centre, Futures Park, Bacup, OL13 0BB or email
[1][email address]

 

If you remain dissatisfied you have a right to appeal to the Information
Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9
5AF.  Telephone 0303 123 1113 or 01625 54 57 45 or visit their website at
[2]https://ico.org.uk/

 

There is no charge for making an appeal.

 

Regards

 

 

Joanna Wood

Committee and Members Services Officer

Rossendale Borough Council

Committee and Member Services¦ Room 213 ¦The Business Centre¦Futures Park

Bacup¦Lancashire¦OL13 0BB

Tel: 01706 252426

Email: [3][email address]

 

Web: [4]www.rossendale.gov.uk

Twitter: [5]@RossendaleBC

Facebook: [6]Rossendale Borough Council

Visit Rossendale: [7]http://www.visitrossendale.com/

 

[8]cid:image001.jpg@01D32E0B.3C5FB6E0

 

 

 

 

From: Doug Paulley [mailto:[FOI #443060 email]]
Sent: 04 November 2017 02:16
To: Freedom Of Information
Subject: Freedom of Information request - S167 List of Accessible Taxis:
update after 6 months - D previously undecided

 

Dear Rossendale Borough Council,

I am writing this Freedom of Information Request in relation to your
Council's compliance or otherwise with the Government's statutory guidance
on implementation of S165-167 of the Equality Act, relating to taxi
services for wheelchair users. All taxi licensing bodies are obliged under
S167(6) to have "due regard" to the document "Access for wheelchair users
to taxis and private hire vehicles: statutory guidance" at
[9]https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/sy...
. The questions I raise below should be interpreted as requests for
recorded information under the Freedom of Information Act.

I have previously made a similar request to you in April 2017. 6+ months
later, I am repeating the request with some variations. I am repeating
because the Statutory Guidance states "We would expect these arrangements
to take no more than a maximum of six months to put in place, following
the commencement of these provisions" - "these provisions" having been
commenced on 6th April.

In response to my previous FOI request on similar matters in April 2017,
you indicated that you did not have a Section 167 list and were currently
undecided whether to create such a list.

1) The Government guidance states: "Whilst LAs are under no specific legal
obligation to maintain a list under section 167, the Government recommends
strongly that they do so. Without such a list the requirements of section
165 of the Act do not apply, and drivers may continue to refuse the
carriage of wheelchair users, fail to provide them with assistance, or to
charge them extra."
Please can you indicate whether you have changed your position since
April, such that you do now have a list of wheelchair accessible taxis
under your powers set out in Section 167 of the Equality Act 2010, and/or
a list of wheelchair accessible private hire vehicles?

2) If you do now have such a list, please provide information in response
to the following questions 2a) to 2j):
2a) On what date was it put in place?
2b) The statutory guidance states "The Government therefore recommends
that a vehicle should only be included in the authority’s (S167) list if
it would be possible for the user of a “reference wheelchair” to enter,
leave and travel in the passenger compartment in safety and reasonable
comfort whilst seated in their wheelchair."
Is this the definition you have used for a taxi or PHV to be considered
wheelchair accessible for the purposes of the list?

2c) The statutory guidance states: "Before drivers can be subject to the
duties under section 165 of the Act, the LA must first publish their list
of designated vehicles, and clearly mark it as ‘designated for the
purposes of section 165 of the Act’. LAs should ensure that their
designated lists are made easily available to passengers, and that vehicle
owners and drivers are made aware. Lists should set out the details of the
make and model of the vehicle, together with specifying whether the
vehicle is a taxi or private hire vehicle, and stating the name of
operator."
Have you published your list? Is it marked "designated for the purposes of
Section 165 of the Act"? Is the make and model of each vehicle listed? Is
each vehicle identified as a taxi or a private hire vehicle? Is the name
of the operator of each vehicle given in the list? Have you made owners
and drivers of vehicles on the list aware that their vehicle has been
listed?

2d) The guidance states: "it would also be helpful to include information
about the size and weight of wheelchair that can be accommodated, and
whether wheelchairs that are larger than a “reference wheelchair” can be
accommodated."
Does your list include information on each vehicle as to the size and
weight of wheelchair that can be accommodated, and whether wheelchairs
larger than a "reference wheelchair" can be accommodated?

2e) The guidance states: "We encourage LAs to provide drivers of taxis and
PHVs who are not exempt from the duties with clear guidance on their
duties with respect to the carriage of passengers in wheelchairs, either
as part of existing driver-facing guidance, or as supplementary
communication."
Have you provided non-exempt taxi/PHV drivers with such guidance?

2f) The guidance states: "We recommend that licensing authority rules for
drivers are updated to make clear when a meter can and cannot be left
running".
Have you updated such rules to make this clear?

2g) The guidance states: "Section 172 of the Act enables vehicle owners to
appeal against the decision of a LA to include their vehicles on the
designated list. That appeal should be made to the Magistrate’s Court, or
in Scotland the sheriff, and must be made within 28 days of the vehicle in
question being included on the LA’s published list."
Please tell me how many such applications have been made to the
Magistrates Court, and how many have been successful.

2h) How many drivers has the authority prosecuted for discriminatory
behaviour contrary to S165 of the Act? How many such prosecutions were
successful? What were the sentences?

2i) How many drivers licensed by yourselves have been prosecuted by other
people or bodies for failure to comply with S165 of the Act? How many such
prosecutions were successful? What were the sentences?

2j) Where drivers have been prosecuted under S165 of the Act, thus
affecting their standing as a "fit and proper person", what resultant
disciplinary action have you taken in respect of their taxi or private
hire vehicle drivers' licenses?

3) If you do not have a S167 list or lists now, please indicate if you now
intend to produce such a list.

4) If you don't have a S167 list but do intend to produce one, please
provide information in response to questions 4a) and 4b) below.
4a) Please indicate when you intend to have the list in place.
4b) Where you have already made relevant decisions, please indicate
whether you intend to comply with the elements of the statutory guidance
set out in 2b) to 2f) above.

5) Irrespective of whether you have created a list or not or indeed
whether you intend to create such a list, since 2010 you have been obliged
to process applications under Section 166 of the Equality Act for driver
medical exemptions from the duty to transport and not discriminate against
wheelchair users. The Guidance states; "the Act allows LAs to grant
exemptions from the duties to individual drivers. These provisions are
contained in section 166, and were commenced on 1st October 2010."

5a) How many exemptions have you granted under S166 of the Equality Act
2010?

5b) The guidance states: "We understand that some licensing authorities
have already put in place procedures for accessing and exempting drivers,
and as an absolute minimum, we think that the evidence provided should be
in the form of a letter or report from a general practitioner."
Do you accept or require a letter or report from a GP to process
applications for driver exemption under S166?

5c) The guidance states: "The Government’s view is that decisions on
exemptions will be fairer and more objective if medical assessments are
undertaken by professionals who have been specifically trained and who are
independent of the applicant. We would recommend that independent medical
assessors are used where a long-term exemption is to be issued, and that
LAs use assessors who hold appropriate professional qualifications and who
are not open to bias because of a personal or commercial connection to the
applicant"
Have you appointed independent medical assessors to determine applications
for medical exemption under S166?

5d) Please provide a copy of your application form for driver exemption
under S166.

5e) The guidance states: "Section 172 of the Act enables drivers to appeal
against the decision of a LA not to issue an exemption certificate. That
appeal should be made to the Magistrate’s Court, or a sheriff in Scotland,
and must be made within 28 days beginning with the date of the refusal."
How many appeals against refusal to issue S166 exemptions have been heard?

5f) How many appeals against refusal to issue S166 exemptions were
successful?

6) The guidance states: "We would therefore recommend that LAs also
publish a list of vehicles that are accessible to passengers in
wheelchairs who are able to transfer from their wheelchair into a seat
within the vehicle. It should be made clear however that this list of
vehicles has not been published for the purposes of section 165 of the Act
and drivers of those vehicles are therefore not subject to the legal
duties to provide assistance."
Do you currently publish a list of vehicles that are accessible to
passengers in wheelchairs who are able to transfer from their wheelchairs
into a seat within the vehicle?

Thank you

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[10][FOI #443060 email]

Is [11][Rossendale Borough Council request email] the wrong address for Freedom of
Information requests to Rossendale Borough Council? If so, please contact
us using this form:
[12]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[13]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[14]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
2. https://ico.org.uk/
3. mailto:[email address]
4. http://www.rossendale.gov.uk/
5. https://twitter.com/RossendaleBC
6. https://www.facebook.com/RossendaleCouncil
7. http://www.visitrossendale.com/
8. http://www.r-awards.co.uk/
9. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/sy...
10. mailto:[FOI #443060 email]
11. mailto:[Rossendale Borough Council request email]
12. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...
13. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
14. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Dear Rossendale Borough Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Rossendale Borough Council's handling of my FOI request 'S167 List of Accessible Taxis: update after 6 months - D previously undecided'.

In response to my question:

"3) If you do not have a S167 list or lists now, please indicate if you now intend to produce such a list."

you said

"Please see answer to Question One."

Your response to Question One was

"At present we do not have a list under Section 167."

How does "At present we do not have a list under Section 167" provide the information I sought "please indicate if you now intend to produce such a list"? Similarly my question as to when you intend to create one, if you do?

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/s...

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

Freedom Of Information, Rossendale Borough Council

Good Morning Mr Paulley

 

Please be advised this is acknowledgement of your email and I will pass
the information onto our Legal Manager to have a look at your
concerns/review your response mentioned below.

 

Regards

Joanna

 

 

From: Doug Paulley [mailto:[FOI #443060 email]]
Sent: 07 December 2017 17:53
To: Freedom Of Information
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - S167 List of
Accessible Taxis: update after 6 months - D previously undecided

 

Dear Rossendale Borough Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information
reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Rossendale Borough Council's
handling of my FOI request 'S167 List of Accessible Taxis: update after 6
months - D previously undecided'.

In response to my question:

"3) If you do not have a S167 list or lists now, please indicate if you
now intend to produce such a list."

you said

"Please see answer to Question One."

Your response to Question One was

"At present we do not have a list under Section 167."

How does "At present we do not have a list under Section 167" provide the
information I sought "please indicate if you now intend to produce such a
list"? Similarly my question as to when you intend to create one, if you
do?

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on
the Internet at this address:
[1]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/s...

Yours faithfully,

Doug Paulley

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[2][FOI #443060 email]

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[3]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[4]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/s...
2. mailto:[FOI #443060 email]
3. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...
4. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Dear Freedom Of Information,

"Please be advised this is acknowledgement of your email and I will pass the information onto our Legal Manager to have a look at your concerns/review your response mentioned below."

I haven't heard from them.

Yours sincerely,

Doug Paulley

Freedom Of Information, Rossendale Borough Council

1 Attachment

Good Morning

I can confirm I have contacted our Legal Manager and made them aware you
are chasing for a response.

 

As soon as I receive any further I will forward this onto you.

Regards

 

Joanna Wood

Committee and Members Services Officer

Rossendale Borough Council

Committee and Member Services¦ Room 213 ¦The Business Centre¦Futures Park

Bacup¦Lancashire¦OL13 0BB

Tel: 01706 252426

Email: [1][email address]

 

Web: [2]www.rossendale.gov.uk

Twitter: [3]@RossendaleBC

Facebook: [4]Rossendale Borough Council

Visit Rossendale: [5]http://www.visitrossendale.com/

 

[6]cid:image001.jpg@01D32E0B.3C5FB6E0

 

 

 

From: Doug Paulley [mailto:[FOI #443060 email]]
Sent: 24 January 2018 17:44
To: Freedom Of Information
Subject: RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - S167 List
of Accessible Taxis: update after 6 months - D previously undecided

 

Dear Freedom Of Information,

"Please be advised this is acknowledgement of your email and I will pass
the information onto our Legal Manager to have a look at your
concerns/review your response mentioned below."

I haven't heard from them.

Yours sincerely,

Doug Paulley

show quoted sections

Clare Birtwistle, Rossendale Borough Council

Dear Mr Paully

My sincere apologies for the delay.  I have reviewed the response given
and your request for a review of the same.  You have been advised that we
do not hold a s167 list at present and we do not hold any recorded
information about our intention to do so in the future. Under the Act we
are therefore unable to provide you with recorded information relating to
the same.  Having spoken to the Licensing Manager however I can advise
that at some point, when we have been able to collate the necessary
information we will prepare a list but we do not have any dates for this
at present.

I hope this provides further clarification however if f you remain
dissatisfied you have a right to appeal to the Information Commissioner’s
Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF. 
Telephone 0303 123 1113 or 01625 54 57 45 or visit their website at
https://ico.org.uk/

There is no charge for making an appeal.

Yours sincerely

Clare

 

Clare Birtwistle

Legal Services Manager (Monitoring Officer)

Rossendale Borough Council

Room 219

The Business Centre

Futures Park

Bacup

OL13 0BB

 

Tel: 01706 252438

Fax: 01706 873577

 

Web: [1]www.rossendale.gov.uk

Twitter: [2]@RossendaleBC

Facebook: [3]Rossendale Borough Council

Visit Rossendale: [4]http://www.visitrossendale.com/

 

 

 

 

From: Doug Paulley [[5]mailto:[FOI #443060 email]]
Sent: 24 January 2018 17:44
To: Freedom Of Information
Subject: RE: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - S167 List
of Accessible Taxis: update after 6 months - D previously undecided

 

Dear Freedom Of Information,

"Please be advised this is acknowledgement of your email and I will pass
the information onto our Legal Manager to have a look at your
concerns/review your response mentioned below."

I haven't heard from them.

Yours sincerely,

Doug Paulley

show quoted sections

Dear Clare Birtwistle,

Thank you for your response;

"You have been advised that we do not hold a s167 list at present and we do not hold any recorded information about our intention to do so in the future."

No I haven't; the first time Rossendale Council has indicated that they do not hold any recorded information about their intention to hold a S167 list is in your email today. At no point has anybody said this.

The fact that there is no recorded information about an intention or otherwise is in itself not acceptable. The Council has a duty to have "due regard" to the Secretary of State's statutory guidance released under S166(6) of the Equality Act 2010. Said guidance strongly recommended that councils implement S167 lists, with a default deadline of October 2017, because "without such a list the requirements of section 165 of the Act do not apply, and drivers may continue to refuse the carriage of wheelchair users, fail to provide them with assistance, or to charge them extra."

Holding no recorded information means that this has not been taken to the licensing committee, nor any reports produced on such. This is a clear breach of the Act, which I intend to bring to the attention of the Department for Transport as part of my report.

Doug Paulley

Yours sincerely,

Doug Paulley

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org