Results for Tests of TRIAMAZON & Ingredients
Dear Sir or Madam,
Under the freedom of information I would like to know the results of the trials that where undertaken in regards to the cancer drug TRIAMAZON ,also what are the ingredients in the drug.
Yours faithfully,
J Garratt
Thank you for your email.
Where a reply is appropriate we aim to send one within 20 working days.
If your enquiry is about a medical matter, please contact NHS Direct on
0845 4647 or visit [1]NHS Choices, or contact your GP surgery.
For the latest on swine flu, please visit [2]the National Pandemic Flu
Service (NPFS) or call 0800 1 513 100.
For general health information you may also find it helpful to refer to
[3]Directgov, the UK Government's Official information website, or the
Department of Health website's [4]Frequently Asked Questions.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.nhs.uk/
2. http://www.direct.gov.uk/pandemicflu/
3. http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/index.htm
4. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/FAQ/index.htm
Dear Sir or Madam,
Thank you for your reply ,but you seem to have missed the point.....I am asking for the results of the trials that were held on the drug TRIAMAZON which seem to be being withheld by the MHRA.....why? ,what have they got to hide? ,are they now above the LAW?.
As you are the Department of Health and therefore above the MHRA it is within your authority to publish the results.....or is it because the trials have shown to radically improve the treatment of cancers, which is not profitable for the drug companies, because there is more profit in prolonging the treatment than giving the cure!.
I look forward to you providing me with the information I have requested.
Many Regards
j garratt
Yours faithfully,
J Garratt
Thank you for your email.
Where a reply is appropriate we aim to send one within 20 working days.
If your enquiry is about a medical matter, please contact NHS Direct on
0845 4647 or visit [1]NHS Choices, or contact your GP surgery.
For the latest on swine flu, please visit [2]the National Pandemic Flu
Service (NPFS) or call 0800 1 513 100.
For general health information you may also find it helpful to refer to
[3]Directgov, the UK Government's Official information website, or the
Department of Health website's [4]Frequently Asked Questions.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
References
Visible links
1. http://www.nhs.uk/
2. http://www.direct.gov.uk/pandemicflu/
3. http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/index.htm
4. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/FAQ/index.htm
Andy Lewis left an annotation ()
It would be worth annotating this request to give some possible background to it.
Triamazon is a name given to a herbal supplement by an Andrew Harris who marketed the herb as a cure for cancer. In January 2008, Trading Standards and the MHRA undertook dawn raids on a premises after concerns that individuals were unlawfully selling drugs. Some substances were found and taken away for tests.
http://www.thisischeshire.co.uk/news/200...
In September of 2008, Andrew Harris was convicted of advertising a cure for cancer on the internet. The pills were being sold at £250 for 100 pills.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manch...
Subsequently, Harris has been making claims that the MHRA have been withholding the tests. From this request, it would appear that the expectation is that these tests would confirm the efficacy and safety of triamazon. This is of course absurd. Any tests done would have been merely to confirm the identity of any substances seized in lieu of the upcoming court case.
This would appear not to be the first request of this type,
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/re...
Email Content stored in attached file 'Long_Email_Body_04_12_2009.html'.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
recorded for legal purposes.
Andrew Harris left an annotation ()
DEFENCE WITNESS STATEMENT
(C J Act 1967 s9: MCA 1980 ss5A(3)(a) and 5B: Criminal Procedures Rules 2005 R27.1)
Statement of :ANDREW HARRIS. Age:50 Years. Occupation :RETIRED.
This statement consisting of 4 page(s) signed by me, is true to the best of my knowledge and belief and i make it knowing that if it is tendered in evidence I will be liable to prosecution if i have wilfully stated anything which I know to be false or do not believe to be true.
I Andrew Harris am a Soverign Subject, i am also the Original Sole Founder of http://www.triamazon.com.
I am a victim of crimes by various New Labour Government Agencies namely: Unlawful Detention, Kidnapping, Restriction of Free Trade, Criminal Damage, Theft, Racial Discrimination, Personal Injury, Character Assasination, committed against me while receiving services from the NHS, DWP, MHRA and a private company namely GlaxoSmithKline.
I am also a victim of the the Daily Mirror newspaper and treasonous government ministers known and not known to be drug company shareholders.
I and many of my fellow Sovereign Subjects are the Victims of the private company policies commonly known as (Acts & Statutes of Parliament) enforced upon me by Alistair Maclean Darling (born 28 November 1953) who is currently trading as a private for profit business commonly refered to and known as the New Labour Party.
In answer to the unjust charges brought against me, my defence relies upon article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215.
Lawful Rebellion.
Some one recently asked me the question; what is Lawful Rebellion?
Rebellion in itself has a number of different meanings and is in fact quite close to another word that seems to be on everyone’s lips; Revolution. Defined meaning of Rebellion; Refusal to accept some authority or code or convention. An act or show of defiance toward an authority or established government.
Defined meaning of Lawful; Being within the law; allowed by law: lawful methods of dissent. (The lawful refusal to conform to the authority that is unjust)
Under article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 (the founding document of our Constitution) we have a right to enter into lawful rebellion if we feel we are being governed unjustly.
Contrary to common belief our Sovereign and her government are only there to govern us and not to rule us and this must be done within the constraint of our Common Law and the freedoms asserted to us by such Law, nothing can become law in this country if it falls outside of this simple constraint.
Article 61 shows quite clearly who really holds the power in this country, that being quite simply us the people; we have Sovereignty not any Parliament and nor can this be taken from us by any Parliament who claim to have taken the people’s Sovereignty. As defined above any act passed by a Parliament to remove the power the people possess, or to remove the power from the point of constraint we invested the power in, is invalid as it falls outside of the constraint laid down by Common/Constitutional Law.
This is a simple safeguard put in place to protect our freedoms under said law and to never allow such freedoms to be removed or diminished. So in reality any Act, Statute and subsequent law or legislation formed by these actions, that effects our freedoms asserted to us, is quite evidently unjust, invalid and most certainly illegal.
By invoking article 61 we are quite clearly stating that we feel we are being governed unjustly and after giving the head of state (Her Majesty) 40 day’s to correct this, if this is not corrected, then we can simply enter into lawful rebellion and we do this under the full protection of our Constitutional Law.
Lawful rebellion allows quite simply for the following recourse;Full refusal to pay any forms of Tax, Fines and any other forms of monies to support and/or benefit said unlawful governance of this country. Full refusal to abide by any Law, Legislation or Statutory Instrument invalidly put in place by said unlawful governance that is in breech of the Constitutional safeguard. To hinder in any way possible all actions of the treasonous government of this land, who have breeched the Constitutional safeguard; defined with no form of violence in anyway, just lawful hindrance under freedom asserted by Constitutional Law and Article 61. Above are listed the three main ways we can as a people rely upon article 61 and what this allows for.
The British people were given over 700 years ago a Law to use as there recourse when faced with either a Parliamentary dictatorship, or a Sovereign trying to rule by Divine Right, which amounts to the same thing. We have a right, and a birth right at that, to be governed properly under our birth right law and no other and certainly not by laws introduced on the pretence of being British Law, when in fact all laws passed since 1973 have been European laws in the guise of British law. We have a right to freedom within our true law and no Parliament can remove this for they were not present in its implementation nor did it need any Parliament, or any Parliament involvement, this was quite simply a deal struck between the people and a Sovereign, a deal which can never be broken.
The traitors that reside in the Parliament of this country only fear one thing and that quite simply is us the people and they know that they can never defend themselves, or defend their treasonous actions, lies and deceit against the power of the people, asserted by and given by, the founding document of our Constitution Magna Carta 1215. They realize, as many others do, that once the British public grasps the power of Magna Carta in both hands and start to use it in their defense; their game is quite simply up.
What does Magna Carta stand for?
In stands for freedom, that the people have Sovereignty that cannot be removed by anyone and it stands for the only real true rule of law; that no one, without exception, is above the law.
What does Article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 (Lawful Rebellion) stand for? You have Sovereignty, realize it, and use it.
When i was first convicted under The Cancer Act 1939, i told the Magistrates that i wanted to be tried by jury at Crown Court, immediately after entering my plea of NOT GUILTY, i was denied my right to a fair trial when the case was heard on a later date by ONE district judge, all by himself he Declared me guilty as he represented the Department of Justice which by the way has a County Court Judgement registered against it and it is a private for proft business registered as tradeing just like everything else that passes itself off in a deceptive manner as a Public Authority.
The Bill of Rights was an Act of re-enforcement and re-statement of the Common Law of this land.
The Bill of Rights was enacted by Parliament in recognition of the conditions contained within the Declaration of Rights its preamble document.
Parliament itself has provided evidence of its own responsibility to uphold Common Law. FACT!
So for an example of their blatant disregard for the Common Law of this land; the clause that says… That all Grants and Promises of Fines and Forfeitures of particular persons before Conviction are illegall and void…Quite clearly states that all fines given without first being tried in a court of law are void and subsequently so are all forfeitures. So why are many people paying fixed penalty fines and allowing forfeitures of their property before conviction? The simple answer is you do not know your own laws and the MP’s passing these Statutes/Acts to make you submit to this are illegally using these Statutes and Acts to fool you.
This relates to any fixed penalty fine given to you and any attempt to remove your property before you have been convicted in a court of law, by a jury of your peers (equals in status). This pertains to another clause found in Magna Carta 1215, article… [39] No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights and possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land. So any court of law that denies your right to a jury, is acting outside of its lawful duty to uphold the Common Law of this land and this should be maintained by all those swearing the Judicial Oath of Allegiance. Please note a jury is the most powerful element in any court of law for they have the power to null a case and even to go against the law if they feel the law is unjust, hence why juries are being denied in the courts; even more evidence of the power of the people!!
Let’s take for another example the MP’s Oath of Allegiance and their blatant disregard for the Oaths they swore and Parliaments conduct over the past 100 years. All Statutory and Parliamentary Acts of law must adhere to one simple rule…all Statutes/Acts of Parliament must only be for the strengthening and preserving of the Common Law of this land…Any Statute/Act of Parliament to the contrary is not valid as proven by…. That all and singular the Rights and Liberties asserted and claimed in the said Declaration are the true auntient and indubitable Rights and Liberties of the People of this Kingdome and soe shall be esteemed allowed adjudged deemed and taken to be and that all and every the particulars aforesaid shall be firmly and strictly holdenand observed as they are expressed in the said DeclarationAnd all Officers and Ministers whatsoever shall serve their Majestyes and their Successors according to the same in alltimes to come.
So all Ministers who have swore allegiance to Her Majesty are required by Common Law and by the evidence of their sworn oath, to maintain the format of Government in accordance with the terms of the Coronation Oath, an Oath taken by the Queen to regulate the Government in accordance to the laws and customs of the people entrenched in the Common Law of this land. Any minister who breaks this oath has removed his legitimacy to his position within Parliament by his own actions and the evidence of his none legitimacy is in the above.
As Major and Straw have both said on past occasions…Parliament is without the authority to require the Queen to break the terms of her coronation oath….this, quite simply, say’s it all.
I urge the Judge dealing with this case to personally issue an order and to over see the order carried out in its entire completion for the immediate commencement of Criminal Investigations with all crimes reported in this statement including the offence of Treason committed against this country and its people, as to NOT do so would bring into question the integrity and oath of office and the commiting of an offence under law by the readers of this document who hold a position of lawful authority.
Signature .....Andrew Harris................................. Date : 26th December 2009.
Andrew Harris left an annotation ()
A MAN has been arrested in Partington on suspicion of selling unlicensed medicine and cultivating cannabis.
The 48-year-old was found at a residence on Hardwick Road today at around 11am with quantities of an unregistered (doesent need to be registered because its natural)drug called Triamazon, which the (alleged) offender was allegedly selling online as a cure for cancer (100% Correct !). Police also seized (took without consent) the man's computer hard drive and documents.
The (Medical Mafia) Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) teamed up with police in Sale and trading standards to target the (No Law Against Triamazon) unlawful selling of the drugs.
Speaking after the arrest Danny Lee-Frost, head of enforcement (Drug Company Shareholder) and intelligence at the MHRA, said: "People can be at considerable risk if they buy medication from illegal and unregistered websites. (But its OK for us to dump useless Swine Flu vaccine on to other countries)
"A medicine bought in this way has no guarentee of safety, (SEROXAT, VIOX, Etc Etc) quality and effectiveness.
"Today's visit demonstrates our commitment to (Big Pharma & GSK ) safeguarding public health and acts as a stark warning to those in the UK who are engaged in any way with supplying medicines (Against our will) illegally.
"We will use all appropriate measures available to stop you, including prosecution (persecution & victimisation) and confiscation (Theft) . The evidence today has shown that people go online hoping to buy a cure for cancer (Due to NHS & Toxic Chemo Failures) and it has actually been sold to them by a drug dealer (Experienced Seroxat Viox & Cancer victim turned Activist) in a council house (Private House) in Manchester.
"We need to hammer home the message that not all online souces selling drugs are (Illegal) safe and educate the public too. If you go online on any unregistered site you don't know what you're buying."
MHRA (Medical Maffia) are running extensive tests on Triamazon, which some websites claim is "100 per cent guaranteed to work" ( or you get your money back) and "puts chemotherapy to shame", and said there is currently no proof that the drug can cure cancer. (Liars ! See the Research links on the home page at www.triamazon.com )
Neighbourhood (Government Brainwashed Gullable Fascist Fool ) inspector for the Sale area, Brendan O'Brien, said: "There is no UK marketing authorisation for Triamazon. To sell this as a cure for cancer is to pray on people's vulnerabilities at a time when they will try anything to get better and that is despicable so we were happy to work with national enforcement organisations such as MHRA. So for us this has not been a bad result, it has been a good day." (oh yeah ? then why does Gordon Brown refuse the Triamazon Petition for the release of the test results to go public ? )
The raid in Sale was one of six nationally for the MHRA's internet day (Natural Cure for Cancer Cover-up) of action, which aimed to crack down on people selling unregistered drugs online.
A spokesperson for MHRA said: "The message (Threat to everyone) we want to put across is that you have to be very careful if you buy your medication online that it is licenced in the UK. If the medicine is unlicensed it means its safety and quality can't be guaranteed. (What ? Just like Seroxt & Viox ?) Claims that it does work and can treat and cure cancer should not be made if that's the case." (Which tests on Triamazon now proves beyound all doubt Triamazon kills cancer cells without harming normal cells which if the public were aware of this information would damage the share prices of the Chemotherapy Manufacturers and Medical Mafia Drug Cartel of Companies share holders )
The offender, (A Cancer Victim with 14 lots of CHOP R Chemo experience under his belt )whose house on Buxton Crescent in Sale was raided at about 7.30am, claimed Triamazon was herbal and was allegedly selling it for around £250 per course.
Mr Lee-Frost said: "He claims it's herbal but seeing as we don't know what's in it (if the MHRA dont know whats in it...then how can they claim it to be unsafe and illegal and also... has the raid warrent been obtained by deception to a magistrate ? we have to test it for everything. Nothing herbal could cure cancer."(What a Plonker ! See the links to the Research listed at Pubmed on the triamazon.com homepage, To say nothing herbal could cure cancer goes to show that the mhra really have got no idea what so ever, The test results on triamazon prove Triamazon to be a viable therapy for every cancer type, but the mhra will not show the test results to the public ! )
http://www.thisischeshire.co.uk/news/200...
Andrew Harris left an annotation ()
In an astonishing turn of events, the heavy handed approach by The MHRA over Triamazon's Andrew Harris , has found themselves in the dock on a charge of abuse of process.
The backdrop to this event started over two years ago when the police were informed by misleading information by the head of enforcement Danny Lee - Frost of The MHRA. The MHRA along with the police and the Daily Mirror (whom they branded Andrew Harris as a drug dealer & cancer pill cowboy) busted down the door of the home of Andrew Harris and confiscated all his products claiming that he was selling drugs without a license. The police initially arrested Andrew on suspicion of deception as they were informed by The MHRA that Andrew Harris was selling worthless pills to the sick and dying as quoted by Greater Manchester Police in the Daily Mirror, which was syndicated to the TV and radio networks and national press.
Two years on it has been proven unequivocally by the MHRA's own process, that the very effective natural non-toxic to healthy cells but lethal to cancer cells Triamazon 500mg capsules contained no pharmaceuticals what so ever.
MHRA are in the dock on 29th July CROWN COURT MINSHULL STREET MANCHESTER UK.
Sadly it may not end there. Andrew Harris will follow then on 31 August 2010 to face trial at Crown Court at Minshull Street Manchester UK only if these charges do not get thrown out by the judge sitting at the abuse of process hearing on 29th July 2010.
Andrew was convicted by an unfair hearing at Trafford Magistrates Court when he was refused his legal entitlement to a trial by jury. Three magistrates were removed from the bench and replaced by one district circuit judge and not one single magistrate being present, the district judge who was sitting on the case alone found Andrew guilty after refusing Andrew's right to a fair trial by jury. Andrew's pleas for a fair trail at Manchester crown court with a jury fell on the deaf ears of the district judge.
The Defence Skeleton Arguments on the Human Rights abuse against Andrew, namely sections 9, 10, & 14, which was prepared by Louise Blackwell QC of Cobden House Chambers Manchester UK www.cobden.co.uk had no effect as it was not seriously taken into consideration by the District Circuit Judge hearing and residing the Trafford Trading Standards Prosecution under The Cancer Act 1939. Andrew Harris. The Founder of www.triamazon.com stated that in his opinion this was obviously a Judicial Stitch-up to secure a guilty verdict in order to save embarrassment to The MHRA.
Vitalis News have a radio show regarding the case at this link
https://www.blogtalkradio.com/vnr/2009/1...
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
Pally left an annotation ()
The DH hasn't sent you a response yet - all you have received is an acknowledgment so no need to question it. They always add the stuff about swine flu