Results: 'Consultation on the Leveson Inquiry and its implementation'

Christopher Whitmey made this Freedom of Information request to Home Office This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

Home Office did not have the information requested.

Christopher Whitmey

Dear Home Office,
The Department’s consultation ended on 10 January 2017. It included the following question:
Question 1: Which of the following statements do you agree with:
(a) Government should not commence any of section 40 now, but keep it under review and on the statute book;
(b) Government should fully commence section 40 now;
(c) Government should ask Parliament to repeal all of section 40 now;
(d) If Government does not fully commence section 40 now, Government should partially commence section 40, and keep under review those elements that apply to publishers outside a recognised regulator;
(e) If Government does not fully commence section 40 now, Government should partially commence section 40, and ask Parliament to repeal those elements that apply to publishers outside a recognised regulator.

1 Can the respondents to this question be placed in various categories?
2 If ‘Yes’ what are the categories? (e.g. individual citizens, news publishers)
3 How many of each category agreed with each of the above statements?
4 If 2=‘No’ how many respondents in total agreed with each of the above statements?

Yours faithfully,

Christopher Whitmey

FOI Requests, Home Office

Dear Mr. Whitmey,

Thank you for contacting the Home Office with your request.

This has been assigned to a caseworker (case ref 44116). We will aim to send you a full response by 28/06/2017 which is twenty working days from the date we received your request.

If you have any questions then please do not hesitate to contact us.

Thank you,

N McKenzie
FOI Requests
Home Office

show quoted sections

FOI Responses, Home Office

1 Attachment

Please find attached our response to your Freedom of Information request.

 

 

Home Office

2 Marsham Street, London, SW1P 4DF

[1]www.gov.uk/home-office

 

 

 

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. http://www.gov.uk/home-office

Christopher Whitmey

Dear J Connolly,
Thank you for your reply.
I note you say. "As such the Home Office does not hold the information you request although I am aware you have submitted the same request to DCMS".
I lodged both requests because I did not know which department was doing the analysis.
Should you be sent the information please will you send it to me?
Yours sincerely,

Christopher Whitmey

FOI Responses, Home Office

This mailbox does not accept incoming messages. Any FOI requests or
inquiries should be sent to [1][Home Office request email].

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[Home Office request email]

Christopher Whitmey

Dear J Connolly,
Thank you for your reply (case ref 44116).
I note you say. "As such the Home Office does not hold the information you request although I am aware you have submitted the same request to DCMS".
I lodged both requests because I did not know which department was doing the analysis.
Should you be sent the information please will you send it to me?
Yours sincerely,

Christopher Whitmey

Christopher Whitmey left an annotation ()

The DCMS have refused my request under s.35(a) [sic]. I presume they meant s.35(1)(a) See: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...