Research of why FOI requests were rejected

The request was partially successful.

Dear Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority,

My name is Jingyuan Wang from Monash University Australia. If possible, please provide the requested information in electronic copies format.
For my research I want to analyze why some FOI requests were rejected, and why the data processing of some requests would exceed the 'cost limit'(under s.12 of the Freedom of Information Act (2000).
Firstly, I want to ask some questions about your information storage system.
1. What is the electronic systems do you use to store operational data such as excel, email and SQL?
2. Whether the query can be completed by searching keywords in the interactive interface, or need to use the database for the query. If there are restrictions on this, please provide them.
3. What is the educational background (qualifications) of the staff members handling FOI requests – including those who make estimates under s.12 - and can they search the database using a programming language(eg. SQL)? We are not interested in the names of the staff members, merely their qualifications.

I also want to know the common reasons that you may reject requests under s.12.
1. In the past 5 years, how many requests have been denied under s.12.
2. For those requests in (1), can you provide a list of any recorded reasons that you rejected the request? (i.e. the detail of the ‘estimate’ you relied upon under s.12)
3. For those requests in (1), could you please provide us with your search process (or proposed search process) for documents required for these rejected request cases?

I would be most grateful for your assistance.

Yours faithfully,

Jingyuan Wang

FOI (Freedom of Information) [Mailbox], Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority

Thank you for emailing the Freedom of Information mailbox at the
Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA).

This mailbox is for those wishing to make requests under the Freedom of
Information Act and Environmental Information Regulations only. If your
email concerns this, you will shortly receive a formal acknowledgement and
reference number. You can also use this mailbox if you have any queries
about an existing request, or if you want to submit an appeal.

IPSA is committed to transparency and accountability and routinely
publishes a large amount of information on its website. It may that the
information you are asking about is already available.

Information about IPSA: [1]https://www.theipsa.org.uk/about-us/

Information about MPs’ costs and expenses:
[2]https://www.theipsa.org.uk/mp-costs/

IPSA Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and
may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware by
Mimecast, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail.

References

Visible links
1. https://www.theipsa.org.uk/about-us/
https://www.theipsa.org.uk/about-us/
2. https://www.theipsa.org.uk/mp-costs/
https://www.theipsa.org.uk/mp-costs/

FOI (Freedom of Information) [Mailbox], Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority

2 Attachments

I am writing to acknowledge your request which was received today 10 March
2023

 

Your request will be dealt with under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
and you should expect our response by 12 April 2023

 

In the meantime, you may find the following information on our website
helpful:

[1]A guide to MPs’ staffing and business costs

[2]News blog and FAQs

 

You may also wish to take a look at our [3]FOI pages on our website and
our [4]FOI Disclosure Log.

 

Responding to your request

 

Section 10 of the Freedom of Information Act allows public authorities to
apply variations to the normal 20 working day timescale in some limited
circumstances. Should this be necessary we will contact you to advise of
an extension in advance of the deadline given above.

 

Should we require further clarification from you, we will contact you
about this as soon as possible.

 

In some circumstances a fee may be payable and if that is the case, we
will let you know. A fees notice will then be issued to you, and you will
be required to pay before we proceed to deal with your request.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Alison Benson

Information Governance Officer

  

[5]www.theipsa.org.uk 

[6]@ipsauk 

 

 

From: Jingyuan Wang <[FOI #958534 email]>
Sent: 10 March 2023 10:34
To: FOI (Freedom of Information) [Mailbox] <[IPSA request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Research of why FOI requests
were rejected

 

Dear Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority,

My name is Jingyuan Wang from Monash University Australia. If possible,
please provide the requested information in electronic copies format.
For my research I want to analyze why some FOI requests were rejected, and
why the data processing of some requests would exceed the 'cost
limit'(under s.12 of the Freedom of Information Act (2000).
Firstly, I want to ask some questions about your information storage
system.
1. What is the electronic systems do you use to store operational data
such as excel, email and SQL?
2. Whether the query can be completed by searching keywords in the
interactive interface, or need to use the database for the query. If there
are restrictions on this, please provide them.
3. What is the educational background (qualifications) of the staff
members handling FOI requests – including those who make estimates under
s.12 - and can they search the database using a programming language(eg.
SQL)? We are not interested in the names of the staff members, merely
their qualifications.

I also want to know the common reasons that you may reject requests under
s.12.
1. In the past 5 years, how many requests have been denied under s.12.
2. For those requests in (1), can you provide a list of any recorded
reasons that you rejected the request? (i.e. the detail of the ‘estimate’
you relied upon under s.12)
3. For those requests in (1), could you please provide us with your search
process (or proposed search process) for documents required for these
rejected request cases?

I would be most grateful for your assistance.

Yours faithfully,

Jingyuan Wang

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[7][FOI #958534 email]

Is [8][IPSA request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority? If so, please
contact us using this form:
[9]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/change_re...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on
the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[10]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/offi...

For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the
latest advice from the ICO:
[11]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...
[12]https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/help/ico-...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

show quoted sections

FOI (Freedom of Information) [Mailbox], Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority

2 Attachments

Dear Jingyuan Wang,

 

Please find attached a response to your freedom of information request.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

Information Governance Team

  

[1]www.theipsa.org.uk 

[2]@ipsauk 

 

IPSA Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is
confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others
authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in
relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and
may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware by
Mimecast, but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.theipsa.org.uk/
2. https://www.twitter.com/ipsauk