We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Charlotte Trenaman please sign in and let everyone know.

Request for information regarding the safeguarding of Julian Assange

We're waiting for Charlotte Trenaman to read a recent response and update the status.

Charlotte Trenaman

Dear Judicial Conduct Investigations Office,

I am very concerned that a miscarriage of justice ( which I understand is a crime) is has been and is happening to Mr Julian Assange, currently held in Belmarsh Prison.

The Freedom of Information Act creates a statutory right for access to information in relation to bodies that exercise functions of a public nature, three different kinds of bodies are covered under the act. Public Authorities, publicly owned companies and designated bodies performing public functions.

In effect I believe Julian Assange has done nothing other than the Freedom of Information Act does. He has provided the public with information which they have a right to know. He has provided the public with information which shows the crimes and wrongdoings of the American government.
If one observes the factual evidence ,ie civilians being shot down randomly by American soldiers in Iraq, which Chelsey Manning and Jullian Assange exposed.
And the behaviour of the American government trying to cover up these crimes by conducting a witchhunt of the two individuals concerned.

One has to ask what the motives of the American government were and are, to scapegoat and punish these two individuals who had done nothing more than follow their conscience and expose a crime. The motives of the American government are non other than to cause such harm to these individuals , so that they can serve as an example to any other person wanting to blow the whistle or expose wrongdoing and crimes by the American government.

This constitutes the end of free press. This is no different from what happened in Tianamen Square in 1989 in Beijing China. I have it from inside information that both the man in the white shirt standing in front of the tanks and the driver of the tank who stopped rather than run over him were executed. Through making an example of these men the Chinese Government sought to intimidate anyone even thinking of standing up against the regime.
And to this day information about this event is being suppressed.

Two questions remain to be answered, 1 ) how did the American Government cover up?

-This of course has been their continuing pointing the finger at , victimisation ,and use of their political power to get power over Assange abroad.

2 ) Why did the American Government cover up?

- Because they will lose power and votes if the truth comes out.

However I believe the British Justice System has an obligation to prevent this cover up causing Mr Assange the harm it has done.

Therefore I am requesting
1) that this matter is looked into,
2 ) that Mr Assange 's has the same freedom to see visitors, lawyers ,family etc as other prisoners,
3 )That Mr Assange has access to pen ,paper,stamps and a working computer,
4 ) That Mr Assange receives proper health care.

Yours sincerely

Charlotte van Emst

JCIO General Enquiries, Judicial Conduct Investigations Office

Thank you for your email.  This an automated response.  Please do not


This email address is for general enquiries only.  We aim to reply to
enquiries within 10 working days.


We do not accept or respond to complaints sent to this email address.  If
you wish to make a complaint, please submit your complaint on our
[1]online portal.


If you have not made a complaint this way before, you will need to
register first before you can submit your complaint.  


We do not respond to requests to intervene in court cases, requests for
advice about court procedures or requests for legal advice.


We suggest seeking advice from a solicitor, law centre or the Citizens
Advice Bureau. 


Before making a complaint, please read the [2]guidance on our website
about the types of complaints we can and cannot accept.  Complaints which
are outside our statutory remit will be rejected.


Complaints about judges and coroners

Make your complaint using our [3]online portal.


Complaints about magistrates (justices of the peace)

Send your complaint to the relevant local [4]advisory committee.


Complaints about tribunal judges and members

Send your complaint to the relevant tribunal [5]president’s office.


Your personal data

You can find information about how the JCIO collects and processes
personal data in our [6]Privacy Notice



show quoted sections

Disclosure Team,

Thank you for your e-mail, I am writing to advise you that your enquiry does not fall under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) regime and has been rejected by the Disclosure Team.

It may be helpful if I explain that the FOIA gives individuals and organisations the right of access to all types of recorded information held, at the time the request is received, by public authorities such as the Ministry of Justice (MoJ). Section 84 of the FOIA states that in order for a request for information to be handled as a FOI request, it must be for recorded information.

For example, a FOI request would be for a copy of a policy, rather than an explanation as to why we have that policy in place. On occasion, the MoJ receives requests that do not ask for recorded information, but ask more general questions about, for example, a policy, opinion or a decision.

You may wish to re-submit your enquiry to the Ministry of Justice, which will be treated as Official Correspondence. Our contact details are as follows:

102 Petty France

Contact Form:


show quoted sections

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are Charlotte Trenaman please sign in and let everyone know.