Removing concent to be governed

k. lucas made this Freedom of Information request to Cabinet Office

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Cabinet Office should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Cabinet Office,
On 14th November 2012 the Home Office forwarded to you a FOIR sent by myself. To date there has been no response forthcoming from yourselves. I copy the original request here for your convenience:

"During my British Politics 101 class several years ago I was taught that all democratic government is by consent. Naturally, if the UK is indeed a democracy, we too are governed by consent. However, despite much research into the subject I have not yet been able to ascertain exactly how consent is removed or withheld by the people of these islands. I have discovered that the words 'none of the above' cannot, by statue, be used on a UK voting ballot. I have gathered also that non-participation in elections is interpreted to give tacit consent to be governed. I also know that during the last nation-wide elections for the EU parliament only 36% of the eligible electorate bothered to participate, suggesting that the other 64% have at lest
some reservations about the nature of government in this country.
My question, therefore, is a simple one - how in the UK does one remove consent to be governed."

Your lack of response to date is, although unsurprising, very telling... or maybe my original FOIR was 'lost in the post' as they say?

I therefore put you on notice that your continued silence will be interpreted to confirm that 'democracy' in this country, as in the European Union (though the sham there is barely even pretended), is nothing better than an illusion of democracy and that in fact we do live in a dictatorship, as we have on these islands for generations.

Notwithstanding, I draw your attention to article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 (which you can read at the following link - ) This constitutional document requires the people of these islands to rise up in Lawful Rebellion against tyrannical dictators; provided, of course that certain conditions have been met... and indeed those conditions have been long since met. In February 2001 Lord Ashbourne handed HRHQE11 a petition signed by twenty-six Peers of the realm (who were formerly the land barons refereed to in Magna Carta 1215). This petition calling for HMHQE11 to defend british rights and freedoms can be read in its entirety, along with accompanying notes and interpretations, at the following link -

"And if we, or our chief Justiciar (should we be out of the kingdom) do not redress the grievance within forty days of the time when it was brought to the notice of us or our chief Justiciar (should we be out of the kingdom), the aforesaid four barons shall refer the case to the rest of the twenty-five barons and those twenty-five barons with the whole community of the land shall distrain and distress us in every way they can, namely by taking of castles, estates and possessions, and in such other ways as they can, excepting (attack on) our person and those of our queen and of our children"

Additional to this is the plain fact that the entire constitution of this Nation has been usurped. -- There can be no Nation State that is not properly and lawfully constituted and agreed to by the people, as the whole notion of a 'Nation State' is a 'legal fiction' which exists only on paper and in the minds of men, i.e. a Nation State NOT a real thing in its own right -- The claim of 'Parliamentary Sovereignty' as somehow 'constitutional' is, frankly, ludicrous. You do hang some pretty spectacular mirrors though, and blow out so much toxic smoke it's unsurprising that the people of these islands have endured your noxious rule for so long; blinded as we have been by your propaganda dressed up as 'Public Relations', some spurious pretence at 'respectability', the systemic economic dependence that has been maliciously built into all of our lives (indeed our very culture and customs), the people processing centres known as schools where each of us is sent to be trained for life under the rule of an entirely lawless and entirely corrupt (from its inception) Palace of Westminster, your unending brutality, and the lack of access to any kind of justice for those of us not 'blue blooded' (inbred) enough to gain access to the pockets, or to the secrets, of the judiciary of this State.

I could continue to list instances of your lawlessness, corruption and excess - from an entirely illegal secret nuclear arms deal with Armaments Corporation of South Africa SOC Ltd, conducted by your current 'Prime Minister', David Cameron, in 1989 (see; to countless of your number being named by victims of prolific and powerful paedophile rings as the perpetrators of the sadistic sexual abuse, which they endured. (Of course you take any and all power you have from those you abuse and control, without whom you would and will be entirely nothing, just as any parasite is nothing without a host.) - I could highlight the 'Common Purpose' which your mind control operatives are imposing around this nation ... I could go on and on, but I would rather give my precious time to something more befitting me.

You may now consider me to be in full Lawful Rebellion as is my duty, not only in accordance with the constitution of this Nation but also in accordance with my own conscience as a peaceful, lore abiding, living, sentient, female man.

Yours faithfully,
kali prajita - formerly k. lucas

Dear Cabinet Office,

Thanks for nothing.

Yours faithfully,

k. lucas

William Hammonds left an annotation ()

A Claim of right removes consent. These folks will use any excuse to assume its given. But I have a feeling you know this;) Try for guidance. and then for a front row seat to watch the end of this system. Peace.

k. lucas left an annotation ()

Thanks William.
You may guess that I've been at this for a fair amount of time now. I'm a member of the FMOTL forum and have made many great friends from there. Whilst I recognise that the freeman on the land ethos has much merit I also realise that many of the methods employed by the freemen and women at routinely ignored by TPTB (go figure).
As for the OPPT I am more than a little suspicious of those claiming to have foreclosed on all governments and banks, etc. The marketing of their scheme (sprang up out of nowhere and was suddenly viral with so many choosing to 'oppt-in' before having even read the documents written by the three 'trustees') is as mainstream as the marketing of any new product for sale or consumption. As for the language used in their UCC filings, they refer to 'self' which in turn, by legalise definition, refers to the 'person' which, by legalise definition, refers to the legal fiction (or strawman as it has come to be called).
Myself and my partner live freely by our own volition, outside of mainstream 'society' as much as this monetary system and our own inventiveness allows, and employ many methods to challenge those who claim authority over us, from questioning on a one-to-one basis, to taking court actions against those who violate our right to self determination. Of course always respecting those freeman principles of 'cause no harm or loss and enter no fraudulent contracts'.
If you feel inclined after reading this you may want to check out our website at in which we record many of our adventures and musings.
Much love and respect, and many thanks for your interest.
Kali Prajita. xxx

William Hammonds left an annotation ()

Hi Kali,Thanks for the message, hope you are all well, You should be proud of what you have done and I have a huge amount of respect for you guys who were at camp autolift. Also thanks for giving me your opinion on the OPPT. Its a little disappointing though when I see alleged freemen(as in, STILL fighting the system)making negative comments about other ideas. I understand you have spent years in the movement, but shifting to OPPT would not mean you have been wasting your time in your own methods for a long time. You should be proud of what you have done and I have a huge amount of respect for you guys at camp autolift.
Dean Clifford commented on global fact radio that if OPPT would be accepted as true, he would wish them the best but that would be their business. This is typical of a sovereign who would prefer to stick to his own methods because they have worked for him, and he has spent years getting there. Hey, why should he care for the masses who have not bothered to secure their own freedom. Why should he support OPPT which has done all the paperwork for the masses when he had to do it himself. The words "alright" and "Jack" come to mind. I think this is irresponsible when he has not completely read the documents and does not understand what 1776 refers to.
Please feel free to contact me on FMOTL if you would like to discuss anything further.

Paul Phillips left an annotation ()

I take it you received no reply from the CO?

Paul Phillips left an annotation ()

I wrote to the CO to ask why they had not replied.
They say it is a matter for the Home Office!
They also say that they have no record of the Home Office forwarding the request to them.