RE: Section 3 (7) (8) Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and Repeal Schedule and Section 11 and 119 Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and Crime and Courts Act 2013 Schedule 9 and Schedule 10

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee now living at 69 Stevens Road, Dagenham RM8 2QP do hereby make a request that:-

1) You should confirm that you do have Section 3 (7) (8) and Repeal Schedule of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. You do have the knowledge of the treaties signed at the United Nations General Assembly which can be relied upon before any Court of Law or Tribunal in the United Kingdom.

2) You do have Section 11 and 119 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, with the Orders made by the Lord Chancellor under Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 which states that there shall be no restrictions in the County Court with regards to Domestic Premises, Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Small Claims.

3) You do have Schedule 9 and Schedule 10 of the Courts and Crime Act 2013.

4) You do have the General Permitted Development Order 2015 No 596 and Repeal Schedules.

5) You do have the decision made in the High Court Appeals NCN [2017] EWHC 2094 (QB) Case number QB/2017/0031 Dacorum Borough Council and Ms Chenalee Bucknall (Formerly known as Ms Chenalee Acheampong) Defendant. Judgment given before Mr Justice Popplewell

6) The above decisions have not been taken into account and consideration by the Judicial Investigative and Conduct Office when making complaint to them about other Judges.

7) Official Misconduct in Public Office at Common Law is a Criminal Offence, The Order made under Section 42 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 does not restrict Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee from taking any Criminal Proceedings.

8) What is the time Limit under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Since Mr Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee believes that the time limit had been increased to a period of 20 Years. You do have Section 241A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 which has come into force.

9) We authorize that the above information can be provided to any Person in any Part of this World, As Subornation of Perjury is a Criminal Offence under the Legislation of any Country and There is no time limit in Criminal Proceedings cause or Matter.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

headofoffice,

Thank you for your email. Please note if you have sent your email to a
large number of recipients we will not send you a response unless your
email specifically refers to a matter which is within the Ombudsman's
remit for consideration.

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee request your attention that under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, A Separate Request have to be made to each public Authority. The Freedom of Information Act 2000 doesn't allow One Request to be made against more than three Public Authorities whilst before a Court of Law, There can be numbers of Claimants and More than two Numbers of Defendants.

There are Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on Direct or Indirect Discrimination under the Human Rights Act 1998 which are now binding on the Lower Courts, as the Lower Court Case has to go for Trial.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

headofoffice,

Thank you for your email. Please note if you have sent your email to a
large number of recipients we will not send you a response unless your
email specifically refers to a matter which is within the Ombudsman's
remit for consideration.

show quoted sections

headofoffice,

Dear Mr and Mrs Bhamjee

I am writing in response to your Freedom of Information request submitted on 8th January 2018 the details of which are copied below with our responses:

1) You should confirm that you do have Section 3 (7) (8) and Repeal Schedule of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. You do have the knowledge of the treaties signed at the United Nations General Assembly which can be relied upon before any Court of Law or Tribunal in the United Kingdom.

THIS OFFICE DOES NOT HOLD THESE DOCUMENTS

2) You do have Section 11 and 119 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, with the Orders made by the Lord Chancellor under Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 which states that there shall be no restrictions in the County Court with regards to Domestic Premises, Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Small Claims.

THIS OFFICE DOES NOT HOLD THESE DOCUMENTS

3) You do have Schedule 9 and Schedule 10 of the Courts and Crime Act 2013.

THIS OFFICE DOES NOT HOLD THESE DOCUMENTS

4) You do have the General Permitted Development Order 2015 No 596 and Repeal Schedules.

THIS OFFICE DOES NOT HOLD THESE DOCUMENTS

5) You do have the decision made in the High Court Appeals NCN [2017] EWHC 2094 (QB) Case number QB/2017/0031 Dacorum Borough Council and Ms Chenalee Bucknall (Formerly known as Ms Chenalee Acheampong) Defendant. Judgment given before Mr Justice Popplewell

THIS OFFICE DOES NOT HOLD THESE DOCUMENT

6) The above decisions have not been taken into account and consideration by the Judicial Investigative and Conduct Office when making complaint to them about other Judges.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR RECORDED INFORMATION FALLING WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.

7) Official Misconduct in Public Office at Common Law is a Criminal Offence, The Order made under Section 42 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 does not restrict Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee from taking any Criminal Proceedings.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR RECORDED INFORMATION FALLING WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000. IT IS INSUBSTANCE COMMENT, OPINION OR A REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVICE.

8) a) What is the time Limit under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Since Mr Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee believes that the time limit had been increased to a period of 20 Years. b) You do have Section 241A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 which has come into force.

a) THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR RECORDED INFORMATION UNDER THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.

b) THIS OFFICE DOES NOT HOLD THIS DOCUMENT

9) We authorize that the above information can be provided to any Person in any Part of this World, As Subornation of Perjury is a Criminal Offence under the Legislation of any Country and There is no time limit in Criminal Proceedings cause or Matter.

THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR RECORDED INFORMATION FALLING WITHIN THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.

As part of our obligations under the FOIA, JACO has an independent review process. If you are dissatisfied with this response, you may write to request an internal review. The internal review will be carried out by someone who did not make the original decision, and they will re-assess how JACO handled the original request.

If you wish to request an internal review, please write or send an email to JACO within two months of the date of this letter, at the following address:

Mr John Critchfield

Head of Office

Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman

9th Floor, The Tower

102 Petty France

London, SW1H 9AJ

If you are still dissatisfied after an internal review decision, you have the right to apply to the Information Commissioner’s Office under Section 50 of the FOIA. You can contact the Information Commissioner’s Office at the following address:

Information Commissioner’s Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK9 5AF

Internet: https://www.ico.gov.uk/Global/contact_us...

Yours sincerely

Joan Wilson
Office of the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman
9th Floor The Tower | 102 Petty France| London SW1H 9AJ
Tel: 020 3334 2909

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman's handling of my FOI request 'RE: Section 3 (7) (8) Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and Repeal Schedule and Section 11 and 119 Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and Crime and Courts Act 2013 Schedule 9 and Schedule 10'.

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee now living at 69 Stevens Road, Dagenham RM8 2QP refer to your decision and request that an Internal Review should be made.

1) We believe that you do have the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, where the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman who does deal with complaints after a complaint has been made to the Judicial Complaints and Investigate Office as your Office came into force from the 3rd April 2006.

2) All Parliaments Acts and Statutory Instruments are now published on the Public Domain which any person can see on the HMSO New Legislation.

3) When there is discussions at the United Nations General Assembly, as this are recorded Information which have been sent to all countries in the World, It does appear that when making a decision against the Office for the Judicial Complaints, you didn't take into consideration of the treaties signed at the United Nations in 1960 even if your Office had come into existence from the 3rd April 2006.

4) MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE- BY DIRECT OR INDIRECT DISCRIMINATION AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT.
The Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman had previously stated that you do have reasonable access to those Parliament Acts when a copy of the Offices shops and Railway Premises Act had been sent to us when we were living at 196 Tiptree Crescent, Ilford, Essex IG5 0ST.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee
and on Behalf of Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee

headofoffice,

Thank you for your email. Please note if you have sent your email to a
large number of recipients we will not send you a response unless your
email specifically refers to a matter which is within the Ombudsman's
remit for consideration.

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee request your attention and consideration that:-

1) The Information Commissioner's Office rules are different where a request should be made separately against each public Authority this does include for an Internal Review Decision.

2) There is a Legal Right to make an Application Claim in the High Court of Justice, where there can be numbers of Claimants and Numbers of Defendants under the CPR Part 19 Rules:

3) There is a Legal Right to have the Minister of the Crown Joined as a Party to the Proceedings under the CPR 19-4A Statutory Instrument 2000 No 2092. When the Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman Office came into establishment, The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 did not revoke the Human Rights Act 1998.

4) The Words: Mal-Administration, This is not included when making a complaint to the Office for the Judicial Complaints where the name has been changed to another Office.

5) There is a decision made in the High Court of Justice Birmingham Administrative Court Office before than Mr Justice Hickinbottom on the 30th July 2014.
Case Reference Number CO/633/2014
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admi...

We thank you in advance and wait to hear from you

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

headofoffice,

Thank you for your email. Please note if you have sent your email to a
large number of recipients we will not send you a response unless your
email specifically refers to a matter which is within the Ombudsman's
remit for consideration.

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee refer to your recent response:-

1) The Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman Commissioner doesn't deal with complaints against Judges before any Court of Law or Tribunal. They deal with complaints against the Government Department.

2) The Independent Police Complaints Commission who deals with complaint against the Metropolitan Police as when a crime has been reported at the Local Police Station, they do not record the Crime, carry out the Investigations and report to the DPP for the Crown Prosecution Services.

3) The Bar Standards Board deals with complaint against Barristers

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

headofoffice,

Thank you for your email. Please note if you have sent your email to a
large number of recipients we will not send you a response unless your
email specifically refers to a matter which is within the Ombudsman's
remit for consideration.

show quoted sections

Critchfield, John (JACO),

1 Attachment

  • Attachment

    RE Freedom of Information request RE Section 3 7 8 Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and Repeal Schedule and Section 11 and 119 Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and Crime and Courts Act 2013 Schedule 9 and Schedule 10.txt

    8K Download View as HTML

[Subject only] FW: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - RE: Section 3 (7) (8) Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and Repeal Schedule and Section 11 and 119 Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and Crime and Courts Act 2013 Schedule 9 and Schedule 10

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman's handling of my FOI request 'RE: Section 3 (7) (8) Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and Repeal Schedule and Section 11 and 119 Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and Crime and Courts Act 2013 Schedule 9 and Schedule 10'.

We, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee and Mrs Sahera Ismail Bhamjee request your attention and consideration to have an Internal Review of the decision made by the Officer and this should be placed before the Ombudsman himself who should make the decision.

1) The Judicial Appointment and Conduct Ombudsman came into Office on the 3rd April 2006, where complaints against Judges before the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 came into force were not considered by your Office as you do have the 2005 Act.

2) The General Permitted Development Order 1988 which was in force at the time has been repealed and The 2015 no 596 came into force where there are many amendments made as this are in the Public Domain.

3) PUBLIC JUSTICE AND KNOWLEDGE AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION AND SPEECH:
I had lost my Son who had committed Suicide in Leicester, where I am not going to remain silent, since this does remind me also were many Zambian Citizens, and Malawian Citizens who had been killed who were struggling for the Independence from the United Kingdom, and the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 which does has a repeal schedule, as the Act does not extend outside England and Wales.

4) The Senior Courts Act 1981, this is a Parliament Act, where this Act also does not extend outside England and Wales. As on the 15th January 1986, I was living outside the United Kingdom.

5. The County Courts Act 1984 which is a Parliament Act- This does not extend outside England and Wales, whilst they were County Court which had the Power to deal with Family Law Matters under the MFPA 1984.

6. The Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, This Act was not in force on the 19th June 2003 or on the 8th December 2003, and You must be prepared to change your mind when New Legislation Comes into force.

7. The Meaning of the Word "EXCEPT" "Exception" in English Language from the Oxford Dictionary: If you can provide me with the meaning of the words under English Law Statute. As Maladministration causing injustice.

8. It is not being a disrespect but it is an argument based on a point of Law, that other Persons should not be victim of rough and fraud Justice.

9. Lord Justice Rupert Jackson QC is to retire this Week, as He was one of the Judges who had made the Order on the 8th December 2003, whilst there is a judgment given very recently in the Court of Appeal does override his decision as Fresh Action can be taken against Judgment obtained by Fraud. Section 23, 38 of the County Courts Act 1984.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

headofoffice,

Thank you for your email. Please note if you have sent your email to a
large number of recipients we will not send you a response unless your
email specifically refers to a matter which is within the Ombudsman's
remit for consideration.

show quoted sections

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org