RE:- Promissory Oaths Act 1868, Impounding of Court Documents, Contempt of Court Proceedings against Newlyn PLC

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee made this Freedom of Information request to Attorney General's Office

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Attorney General's Office.

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee of 196 Tiptree Crescent, Ilford, Essex IG5 OST, Tell 0203-6010-417 do hereby request that:-

1. How many Prosecutions have been brought under the Promissory Oaths Act 1868 During the Last 20 Years.

2. How many times has the DPP for the Crown Prosecution Services have impounded Court Documents during the Last 10 Years.

3. Why did the HM Attorney General not authorise Contempt of Court Proceedings against Newlyn PLC as an Order was made in the Romford County Court before His Hon Judge Platt, Since Newlyn PLC who are the Enforcement Agents, as they are day Light Robbers.

4. There is Section 23 (1) (g) Fraud or Mistake, 38 (1), 76 of the County Courts Act 1984. As the County Court Circuit Judge can make any Order which could be made by the High Court Judge.

5. There is a decision given in the European Court of Human Rights in the Times Newspapers Ltd and Mr Kennedy Versus the United Kingdom

Article 25, 26 and 27 of the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights signed at the United Nations in 1966,
This is not mentioned in the Civil Procedure Rules Part 3, Part 7, Part 8, Part 23, Part 54.

6. Why are there no Circuit Judges in many County Courts in the United Kingdom, as the Court Fees are being Increased by High Percentage, than the Citizens does have the Choice which level of Judge should hear and try the Claim, when the District Judge has no Jurisdiction Power to hear and try a claim arising from Direct or Indirect Discrimination.

7. You have a Copy of the Zambia Independence Act 1964 Section 1.
and What type of Evidence and Particulars of Claim you require from me, when this information is Not Exempt information which is more than 30 Years.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

Please find attached a response to your Freedom of Information Act request of the 8th of April.

Yours sincerely,

Massimo Magee
Freedom of Information Officer

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee refer to your reference FOI/69/15 which is undated May 2015 and request that there should be an Internal Review of the decision with the Legal Right to make an Application to the High Court of Justice.

1. I believe that the HM Attorney General is the Minister who is responsible for the appointment of the DPP Crown Prosecution Services, The Serious Fraud Office and other Officers in the Treasury Solicitors whose name has recently been changed to The Government Legal Services Department.
This was to save time and Costs, since the HM Attorney General is responsible for reporting to the Parliament

2. There is a Statutory Instrument 2012 No 3028, and the Interpretation Act 1978, Section 2, 15, 16 and 21, as this Act does bind the Crown-
The HM Attorney General and Former Attorney General/Solicitor Generals should have the Knowledge of the County Courts Act 1984, when the County Courts Act 1984 bill was being debated in the House of Lords and the House of Commons, when it was given Royal Ascent, He or they should have the Knowledge. The Refusal to confirm does amount to obstruction of Justice.

The Officer should have taken this into consideration also as a Request under the Data Protection Act 1998.

3. The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg- They have sent a Communicated Case of The Times Newspapers Ltd and Mr Kennedy to the United Kingdom Government.
Since there is a Breach of Article 25, 26, 27 of the International Covenant for Civil and Political Rights signed at the United Nations for a considerable number of years-
By the Officers where the HM Attorney General is responsible for them.

4. The HM Attorney General and HM Solicitor General does has reasonable Access to the Crime and Courts Act 2013, when the Bill was being debated in the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
He is also aware of the Access to Justice Act 1999 Section 54, 55, 56, and 57.
As there is a Legal Right to Appeal from a decision of the District Judge to the Circuit Judge, and than to the Court of Appeal.

The Circuit Judge can also grant a Certificate to Appeal to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom under the Leap Frog System.

5. The Zambia Independence Act 1964 is a Parliament Act-
The Public Records Office Act 1958 does apply, as Information is not exempt information after a period of 30 Years.
The HM Attorney General is also a Member of the Bar Council, when Legal Proceedings have been taken against the Bar Council as with regards to the Professional Rules of Code of Conduct on Barristers for Misleading the Court,

6. The High Court Judge Mr Justice Cooke on the 29th May 2002 when sitting as a High Court Judge, He had given some directions, whilst I wasn't responsible for drawing and sealing up the Court Orders on an Ex-Parte Application.

7. The Romford County Court Circuit Judge had requested the HM Attorney General as with regards to Contempt of Court, this has been reported in the Press.

8. There is a Judgment given yesterday in the High Court of Justice Administrative Court where the Vicar Paul Nicolson wins case against Unlawful Court Costs,
This has been reported in the Press and the Judgment has been published on the BailII web Site.

Since the Counsel-Barrister for the Haringey Council, they did conceal and suppress Evidence of Section 26 (2) of the Crime and Courts Act 2013,
and other Sections from the Courts Act 2003, when the Clerk to the Justices does act in Bad Faith, than there are not immune from any Legal Proceedings.

9. The HM Attorney General does has a Statutory Duty also, as He does see the Secretary of State for the Home Department, and the Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice.
As the Forest Gate and Ilford Metropolitan Police have been refusing to record a crime, and carry out the Investigations and report to the DPP against other Court Officers in the Magistrates Court.
The HM Attorney General has applied in the Court of Appeal for the Offence of Official Misconduct in Public Office at Common Law

I see no grounds and reasons why the HM ATTORNEY GENERAL can't appeal in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, when the Court Officer is wrongly listing the Application as Civil Proceedings when there are Criminal Proceedings, cause or Matter.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

1 Attachment

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

Please find attached a response to your request for an internal review of your Freedom of Information Act request of 8 April 2015, combined with a response to your Freedom of Information Act request of the 6th of May 2015.

Yours sincerely,

Massimo Magee
Freedom of Information Officer

show quoted sections