RE:-Judgment in the Court of Appeal 25-10-2017 Ismail Kamoka and Others V (3) The Attorney General and Crown Proceedings Act 1947 Section 2

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee made this Freedom of Information request to Attorney General's Office

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Attorney General's Office.

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee do hereby request that there is a Judgment in the Court of Appeal where the HM Attorney General was named the 3rd Defendant.
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office and the Home Office were also party to the Proceedings.

Does the Law Officers working for the Attorney General have to be named in the Legal Proceedings.

2. Do you have The Crown Proceedings Act 1947 Section 2 and Decisions given in the Courts under this Section Published.

3) Does the Law Officers have the Knowledge of the Hunter Case which was decided sometimes back when I was living outside the United Kingdom- as the Senior Court Act 1981 does not apply to Overseas Country.
It was more reasonable that Hunter Case of 1982 should no longer be followed following the Judgments made on the 25th October 2017.

4) Does the Attorney General or HM Solicitor General have the Decision of Finbow Versus Air Ministry which was heard on the 9th April 1963.
This is reported in the Law Reports where the Attorney General, The Solicitor General and the Law Officers does have reasonable access to the Law Reports.

5. The Law Officers in the Attorney General Chambers are relying on Repealed Parliaments Act and Misleading the Court and Obtaining Illegal Orders and Making Persons Prisoners in their Own Home.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

Thank you for contacting the Attorney General’s Office (AGO).

 

Please note the Attorney General provides legal advice to the government
and is unable to give legal advice, assistance or support to individuals.
The Attorney General does not have investigatory powers.

 

We strive to answer all correspondence that falls within the remit of the
AGO within 20 days. However, we are unable to reply to matters that do not
fall within the responsibility of the department.

 

If your correspondence is in relation to:

 

·       Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) matters or complaints – please
contact the CPS: [1]http://www.cps.gov.uk/ or refer to the CPS complaints
procedure: [2]http://www.cps.gov.uk/contact/feedback_a...

·       Courts or judges – please contact the Ministry of Justice:
[3]https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...  

·       Police – please contact the Home Office:
 [4]https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

 

You may wish to redirect your correspondence to another department that
has responsibility for the issue you have raised.

 

If your email is regarding the case of David de Freitas, please note that
the Attorney General is giving consideration to the requests made by Mr De
Freitas, and will make a decision in due course.

More information about the role of the AGO can be found at our website:
[5]https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati....  

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.cps.gov.uk/
2. http://www.cps.gov.uk/contact/feedback_a...
3. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...
4. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...
5. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

3 Attachments

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

 

In response to your email of the 9^th December, I would like to clarify
the information you have requested does not amount to requests for
information pursuant to the FOIA.

 

Regards,

 

 

[1]cid:image005.png@01D3DB1A.E1F74E30 FOI Officer
E:
[2][Attorney General’s Office request email]
T: 020 7271 2492
5-8 The Sanctuary, London, SW1P 3JS
[3]Twitter_Logo_Blue@[4]attorneygeneral
| [5]gov.uk/ago
Making law and politics work together at
the heart of the UK constitution

 

 

 

 

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Attorney General’s Office's handling of my FOI request 'RE:-Judgment in the Court of Appeal 25-10-2017 Ismail Kamoka and Others V (3) The Attorney General and Crown Proceedings Act 1947 Section 2'.

I am not seeking legal advice from the Attorney General or the Solicitor General of the United Kingdom.

The Judgment given in the Court of Appeal has been published in the Public Domain Document, it is very surprising that your Office does not have the Court Order.

The Crown Proceedings Act 1947, is an Act of Parliament which was enacted before I was born and before I came to the United Kingdom.

The Senior Court Act 1981 does not apply to any Overseas Country where an Injunction Order can't be made when any Person was living outside the United Kingdom.

The Family Law Act 1986 is a Parliament Act, where Section 60, and 59 (1) (2) does state the Word Attorney General.
Declaration of Marital Status Section 55 (1) (d), 58 and 59.

The refusal to intervene when a Petition had been served on the HM Attorney General Chambers at the time, this does amount to Contempt of Parliament Act and Breach of the United Nations Treaties.

The Law Officers may be committing a Treason Charge against the Overseas Country which is a republican State as Once Independence Given can't be taken away.

The High Court Judge had given permission to my Wife and Children to take Proceedings against the Attorney General in his Official Capacity and Personal Capacity. When a High Court Judge gives the Directions than you can't go to a Master and state it is an abuse of Process of Court when the Law Officers are using the Name and Title of the Attorney General or HM Solicitor General for their Own Benefit by Illegal Means.

The Late Master of Rolls Lord Donaldson had stated that the Court of Appeal will refer the History of my Case to the Attorney General and Whether the Attorney General wants to issue an Application under Section 42 of the Senior Court Act 1981, this was in November 1991.

The Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 Section 11, 27, 28 and 119 are Parliaments Act which the Law Officers have ignored the Parliaments Act.

The Law Officers have also failed their Statutory Duty under Section 188 of the Legal Services Act 2007 and Section 23 of the County Courts Act 1984 and Permitted the Bar Mutual Fund Ltd to Pervert the Cause of Justice by failing to take account of the Attorney General's Reference on the 14th October 2002 in the Criminal Division Court of Appeal.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

4 Attachments

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

 

Please see the attached response to your internal review.

 

Regards,

 

[1]cid:image005.png@01D3DB1A.E1F74E30 FOI Officer
E:
[2][Attorney General’s Office request email]
T: 020 7271 2492
5-8 The Sanctuary, London, SW1P 3JS
[3]Twitter_Logo_Blue@[4]attorneygeneral
| [5]gov.uk/ago
Making law and politics work together at
the heart of the UK constitution

 

 

 

 

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Attorney General’s Office's handling of my FOI request 'RE:-Judgment in the Court of Appeal 25-10-2017 Ismail Kamoka and Others V (3) The Attorney General and Crown Proceedings Act 1947 Section 2'.

I am surprised that you don't have the information, whilst the Government Legal Services Department are the Appointed Solicitors and who instructs the Counsel-Barrister as their names does appear on the Transcript of the Judgment which is a public Record

The Master of the Court of Appeal has given me the directions to issue the appellants Notice as under Section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 does apply.

Please provide a list of the Name of the law officers in the Attorney General Chambers, as Barristers have no Immunity from Criminal Proceedings, and Aid and Abet and Counsel shall be treated as the Main Offender.

When there was British Rule in Nyasaland (Republic of Malawi)
and Northern Rhodesia (Now Republic of Zambia)
Some of the Officers had caused unnecessary hardship to My Father and Late Sisters.

I had learnt Constitutional Law in the Republic of Zambia, and had approached Mr Mainza M Chona SC (Who was the Former Vice President and Home Affairs and Attorney General of the Republic of Zambia)

You are aware the amount of Costs Paid to the Barristers,
I have to make a similar type of application and which will costs more as I am not restricted from taking Proceedings under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Section 241A applies.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

4 Attachments

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

 

Please see the attached AGO response to your emails of 25^th December 2018
and 17^th January 2019.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Correspondence Officer

 

[1]cid:image005.png@01D3DB1A.E1F74E30 Correspondence Officer
E:
[Attorney General’s Office request email]
T: 020 7271 2492
5-8 The Sanctuary, London, SW1P 3JS
 
[2]Twitter_Logo_Blue@[3]attorneygeneral
| [4]gov.uk/ago
Making law and politics work together
at the heart of the UK constitution

 

 

*********************************************************************+
This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.

Activity and use of departmental systems and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.
*********************************************************************

References

Visible links
3. https://twitter.com/attorneygeneral
4. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

AGO Correspondence would like to recall the message, "AGO Response - Ismail Bhamjee emails of 25/12/18 and 17/01/19".
*********************************************************************+
This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.

Activity and use of departmental systems and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.
*********************************************************************

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

4 Attachments

Dear Mr Bhamjee,

 

Please see the attached AGO response to your emails of 25^th December 2018
and 17^th January 2019.

 

Please accept our apologies for the typographical error in the original
response we sent you at 16:27, which incorrectly stated that our response
was sent on 25^th January 2018.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Correspondence Officer

 

[1]cid:image005.png@01D3DB1A.E1F74E30 Correspondence Officer
E:
[Attorney General’s Office request email]
T: 020 7271 2492
5-8 The Sanctuary, London, SW1P 3JS
 
[2]Twitter_Logo_Blue@[3]attorneygeneral
| [4]gov.uk/ago
Making law and politics work together
at the heart of the UK constitution

 

 

*********************************************************************+
This e-mail is private and is intended only for the addressee and any copy recipients. Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted.
If you are not an intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a copy.

Activity and use of departmental systems and the Criminal Justice Extranet is monitored to secure their effective operation and for other lawful business purposes. Communications using these systems will also be monitored and may be recorded to secure effective operation and for other lawful business purposes.
*********************************************************************

References

Visible links
3. https://twitter.com/attorneygeneral
4. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...