RE:- Costs paid to the Barrister Mr N. Ham High Court of Justice 14th September 2017 Yusuf Sarodia and Redbridge Council, and Name of the Legal Officer

The request was partially successful.

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Redbridge Borough Council,

I, Ismail Bhamjee now living in Dagenham, whilst you do have the Knowledge of my Address and Email Address, I am requesting this information through what to they Know as it is in the Public Interests as I have been treated unfairly.

1) There is a decision made in the High Court of Justice Administrative Court on the 14th September 2017 where the Transcript of the Judgment has been published in the Public Domain
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admi...
Case number CO/850/2017
The name of the Barrister Mr N. Ham has been given.
Can you disclose the amount of Costs that had been paid to the Barrister in the High Court of Justice and also in the Magistrates Court if there was a different Barrister than his or her name.

Can you provide the name of the Legal Representative in the Legal Services Department who had instructed the Barrister.

2) There is another Judgment in the Administrative Court on the 5th October 2017
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admi...
The London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
and
The Secretary of State for Health
and
The London Borough of Redbridge

The Barrister Deok Joo Rhee QC instructed by LB Redbridge for the 1st Interested Party.

Can you disclose the amount of Costs that had been paid to the Barrister.

3) You are aware of the Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 and the Statutory Instruments issued by the Lord Chancellors as Lay Representatives Order for Small Claims.
Since there has been direct or Indirect Discrimination against me for a considerable number of Years.
Any claim for Direct or Indirect Discrimination has to be heard and determined before a Circuit Judge and not the District Judge.
You are aware that there are no Circuit Judges at the Romford County Court.

4) You are aware of the CPR 54-17 Rules and Section 66, 151 and Schedule 7 of the Senior Courts Act 1981. I am aware that this is in the Public Domain but you do withhold information to the Courts and Tribunals and take an Advantage and place many citizens at a disadvantage. I don't want any other Citizens to face the same hardship as what you and the London Borough of Newham Borough Council have done to me, and my Family.

5) You are aware of the Human Rights Act 1998, and Article 9 of the Convention Treaties Freedom of Religion and Conscience
Since I don't have the mandate and Power to alter and Change the words in the Holy Bible Christian Religion or the Holy Quran of the Muslim Religion. Those who lie does commit a Sin and are liable to be punished here on Earth and thereafter.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

London Borough of Redbridge, Redbridge Borough Council

Information request
Our reference: 1293933

show quoted sections

London Borough of Redbridge, Redbridge Borough Council

1 Attachment

Information request
Our reference: 1293933

show quoted sections

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Redbridge Borough Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Redbridge Borough Council's handling of my FOI request 'RE:- Costs paid to the Barrister Mr N. Ham High Court of Justice 14th September 2017 Yusuf Sarodia and Redbridge Council, and Name of the Legal Officer'.

I am requesting for an extension of time also for the Internal Review since you have not mentioned of Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 (As amended) and the Statutory Instrument 1999 No 1225 Small Claims Lay Representatives, since Mr Yusuf Sarodia's address is known to you, and there is Misfeasance in Public Office and Indirect or Direct Discrimination by the Officer Kate McCrimmon.

You are aware of the Statutory Instrument 1987 No 765 which had been continued under the General Permitted Development Order 1988, than 1995 No 419 and it has been continued under the 2015 No 596.

You do have the Documentary Evidence Act 1868 which is still in force.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

London Borough of Redbridge, Redbridge Borough Council

Information request
Our reference: 1293933

show quoted sections