RE:- Article 9 Freedom of Religion and Conscience NCN:  EWHC 3404 (Admin) Before Mr Justice Warby 25-11-2015
Dear Attorney General’s Office,
I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee do hereby make a complaint and request your attention and consideration that:-
1. There is a Judgment given before Mr Justice Warby in the Administrative Court on the 25th November 2015. Please see http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admi...
Paragraph 23 of the Judgment does mention of Article 9
Paragraph 24 of the Judgment does mention of Article 2.
There are Secretary of State for the Home Department,
The Lord Chancellor SS Ministry of Justice,
The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government,
The Secretary of State for Education
2. There is a House of Lords Judgment Gillick V West Norfolk and Wishbech  UKHL 7 (17th October 1985)
Since the House of Lords Judicial Office had been abolished under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.
Documents for 20 Years or More are no Longer Exempt Information by Virtue of Section 63 (1) (a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
and Changes made by the Constitutional Reform Governance Act 2010.
Can you provide a copy of the Final Order made in the House of Lords, with the Order for Costs.
3. There is a Judgment given in the TCC before Mr Justice Coulson Newlyn PLC Versus London Borough of Waltham Forest Council
Claim Number HT-2016-000029.
Will the HM Attorney General authorise the Issuing of Contempt of Court Proceedings against Newlyn PLC, and Felton Law,
Since the Documents are no Longer Legal Privilege Documents.
I have to Apply for Permission of the High Court Judge under the CPR Part 81 Rules.
Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee.
Dear Attorney General’s Office,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
I am writing to request an internal review of Attorney General’s Office's handling of my FOI request 'RE:- Article 9 Freedom of Religion and Conscience NCN:  EWHC 3404 (Admin) Before Mr Justice Warby 25-11-2015'.
I request your attention and consideration that the Information Commissioner's Office does require separate response for each request made, and not One Response to two or more requests.
My request have not been Vexatious Requests, whilst you should have taken the Data Protection Act 1998 into consideration, since Article 9 of Freedom of Religion and Conscience, Your Office can't force and compel a person to ignore his or her religion belief or opinion, as there is a commandment in the Holy Quran or in the Christian Bible, that A person must not lie or Steal.
The Late Ngwazi Dr Hastings Kamuzu Banda, The Late Mr Simon Mwansa Kapwepwe, and Kenneth Kaunda The First President of the Republic of Zambia had been sent to Prison in the 1959 when there was the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland. They were released after a period which is a recorded information, as this information is no Longer Exempt information.
There has been a breach of Article 14 of the Convention Treaties by the Law Officers in the HM Attorney General's Office.
The HM Attorney General's Office have deliberately and intentionally refused to provide a copy of the Letter which had been sent by the Officer in the Court of Appeal after the Judgment had been given in the Court of Appeal on the 14th May 2003 in A1/A2/A3/2003/0596 Between Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee versus David Forsdick, R. Taylor, David Elvin QC, James Mauruci, Robert Walton and the Treasury Solicitor, and Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee Versus The First Secretary of State which was an Appeal from the Chancery Division. Since Lord Justice Carnwath was known to the Barristers at Land Mark Chambers, whilst there was no fair hearing under Article 6 of the Convention Treaties.
The Meaning of "Individual Appeals" under the CPR 52 rules 11 (a) (b), as there are some Court Officers who does prepare the Bench Memorandum for the Lord Justices in the Court of Appeal which does cause injustice to many other Citizens
It isn't me who has been causing expenses on the HM Attorney General's Office or the Court system of England and Wales, but it is the HM Attorney General's Office by way of Entrapment has been causing distress, inconvenience to me and other Citizens in the whole World, when it is not the function of any Attorney General or Solicitor General to misapply any Parliament Act.
IT Is the Law Officers in the HM Attorney General's chambers who are causing Harassment or Collective Harassment under Section 1, 2, and 7 (3A) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 when relying on repealed Parliaments Act or Statutory Instruments issued by any Minister of the Crown.
The Former Home Secretary of State had previously stated that persons who come from abroad should learn English, whilst the Law Officers in the HM Attorney General Chambers doesn't understand the meaning of the word
"Except Traffic Contravention Debt"
I am not seeking any Legal Advice from the Attorney General Chambers or any other Government Minister or Department, as my Grand Father the Late Mr Ibrahim Mohomed Bhamjee had trained me when I was young, and had paid for my School Fees as his words can be found and traced in the Holy Quran and other Statutes of Law.
You are aware that the Civil Courts has no Jurisdiction Power to grant a declaration of Innocence to a defendant who has committed a Crime, whilst your Office is shutting out other Citizens by authorising a Section 42 of the SCA 1981 order as Being Vexatious Litigants, when they are not Vexatious Litigants as you failed to take into consideration of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/r...
Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee
Dear Mr Bhamjee,
Please find attached correspondence for your attention.
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.Donate Now