RE:- 1) Saif Ali and Another V Sydney Mitchel and Company (a firm) and Others

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee made this Freedom of Information request to Attorney General's Office

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Attorney General's Office should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee do hereby make a request that:-

1) You do have the Judgment in the House of Lords which are normally published that any person can see and View.
http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1978...

2) I am not seeking any Legal Advice from the Attorney General's Office, and I request that this Email should be placed before the HM Attorney General for him to response as He is an Ex-Official Member of the General Council of the Bar.

3) When a Complaint is made to the General Council of the Bar about the Barristers Professional Rules of Code of Conduct, it isn't an application to vary and revoke the Order of the Court or Tribunal as they are responsible for taking the Barristers before the Inns Court.

4) You Can see and view the Judgments in the Administrative Court
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admi...
17th February 2015
Niall Carroll
Versus
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Others

5) Does the HM Attorney General or Solicitor General revokes or varies the General Permitted Development Order and If they have revoked the Orders than please kindly provide me the Statutory Instrument laid before the House of Commons.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

AGO Correspondence, Attorney General's Office

Thank you for contacting the Attorney General’s Office (AGO).

 

Please note the Attorney General provides legal advice to the government
and is unable to give legal advice, assistance or support to individuals.
The Attorney General does not have investigatory powers.

 

We strive to answer all correspondence that falls within the remit of the
AGO within 20 days. However, we are unable to reply to matters that do not
fall within the responsibility of the department.

 

If your correspondence is in relation to:

 

·       Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) matters or complaints – please
contact the CPS: [1]http://www.cps.gov.uk/ or refer to the CPS complaints
procedure: [2]http://www.cps.gov.uk/contact/feedback_a...

·       Courts or judges – please contact the Ministry of Justice:
[3]https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...  

·       Police – please contact the Home Office:
 [4]https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

 

You may wish to redirect your correspondence to another department that
has responsibility for the issue you have raised.

 

If your email is regarding the case of David de Freitas, please note that
the Attorney General is giving consideration to the requests made by Mr De
Freitas, and will make a decision in due course.

More information about the role of the AGO can be found at our website:
[5]https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati....  

 

References

Visible links
1. http://www.cps.gov.uk/
2. http://www.cps.gov.uk/contact/feedback_a...
3. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...
4. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...
5. https://www.gov.uk/government/organisati...

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

The Attorney General and the Solicitor General are the Responsible Minister for the Government Legal Services Department and the Crown Prosecution Service.

There is a decision in the Court of Appeal of Taylor and Another versus Lawrence where the Court of Appeal does have the Power to Re-open the Case where there is--

This case and Rule was not brought to the attention of the Divisional Court in the Proceedings number CO/3208/2003 Between HM Attorney General versus Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

The Counsel for the HM Attorney General was Adam Tolley instructed by the Treasury Solicitor.

He didn't Inform the Divisional Court of the decision given in the House of Lords where many persons are facing with wrong Civil Restraint Orders and the HM Attorney General has to pay the Court Fees and Obtain Court Documents and it is Contempt of Court also.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I, Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee request your attention that the House of Lords Judgments are Public Records. There was a Judgment given in the High Court of Justice, The Court of Appeal and The House of Lords
It was Ordered that Ministers and Civil Servants are not immune from Contempt of Court Proceedings.

The House of Lords Judgment does state that a Minister can be sued in his Official Capacity or Personal Capacity.

There is the HM Solicitor General who acts on Behalf of the HM Attorney General

There are Law Officers who acts on behalf of the HM Attorney General and also on Behalf of the HM Solicitor General.

There is a Right for any Person to have the Proceedings Discontinued and this does apply to any Government Minister or Department.

When was Section 11 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 came into force? This is a Question and not seeking any Legal Advice from the Law Officers.

The Court of Appeal did write a Letter to the HM Attorney General in the year 1991,
Where the Documents are stored after the Limitation Period?

Name and Address and Telephone number.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I have written many requests to your Office, it does appear that the Law Officers are not the HM Solicitor General or HM Attorney General appointed by the Prime Minister.

The Law Officers does provide Advice to the HM Solicitor General or HM Attorney General.

When I was in the Court of Appeal in the Year 1991, the Master of Rolls had stated that they will refer the History of my matters whether the Attorney General would like to issue the Section 42 of the SCA 1981.

Court Statements are public Records.

The High Court Judge Mr Justice Hooper had also stated that I should contact the Law Officers who will contact the Attorney General.

Therefore you should provide me with the Names of the Law Officers since Civil Servants are not immune from Contempt of Court Proceedings.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee

Dear Attorney General’s Office,

I request that the time period has expired and you should have the knowledge since some civil servants are also Barristers and Solicitors.

The Saif Ali and Another Versus Sydney Mitchel and Company (a firm) and others does apply to any Barrister who is the member of the Bar Council.

Section 2 of the Crown Proceedings Act 1947 does apply to the Government Ministers and Civil Servants since the Parties which comes to power does normally changes at other times.

Yours faithfully,

Ismail Abdulhai Bhamjee