Qualifications of AA and PA registrants
Dear General Medical Council,
The Medical Act 1983. Part II, 4, details 'Qualifying examinations and primary United Kingdom qualifications'. All the qualifications are those of doctors. not PAs or AAs.
While the Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order 2024 has been published more recently, it does not set out the qualifications to be presented by potential registrants who are, or claim to be, AAs or PAs in an equivalent manner.
The GMC’s overarching objective (again I refer to the Medical Act 1983, section 1) is to protect the public, and involves the pursuit of the following objectives:
(a) to protect, promote and maintain the health, safety and well-being of
the public,
(b) to promote and maintain public confidence in the medical profession,
and
(c) to promote and maintain proper professional standards and conduct for
members of that profession
If no training standards are established for AAs and PAs, how is it possible to meet any one of those statutory objectives? Please provide any relevant documents, including minutes of meetings where this issue was discussed.
Yours faithfully,
Susan Sollazzi
Thank you for getting in touch. Please note this is an automated email.
Your receipt of this means that we have safely received your email.
We are currently receiving a high volume of requests and there will be a
delay in getting back to you with a further acknowledgement. We will do so
as soon as we can.
Since 6 December 2023, the GMC has been subject to the Welsh Language
Standards. You are welcome to contact us in Welsh and we will respond in
Welsh, without this causing additional delay.
In the meantime, if you want any further information about the GMC, please
visit our website: [1]Home - GMC (gmc-uk.org)
General Medical Council
We work with doctors, patients, and other stakeholders to support good,
safe patient care across the UK. We set the standards doctors and those
who train them need to meet, and help them achieve them. If there are
concerns these standards may not be met or that public confidence in
doctors may be at risk, we can investigate, and take action if needed.
This email may contain privileged or confidential information which should
only be used for the purpose for which it has been sent.
If you are not the addressee or have received this email in error, please
do not read, print, re-transmit, store or act in reliance on it or any
attachments. Please email the sender and then immediately delete it.
The General Medical Council is a charity registered in England and Wales
(1089278) and in Scotland (SC037750)
You are welcome to contact us in Welsh. We will respond in Welsh, without
this causing additional delay.
_________________________________________________________________
Cyngor Meddygol Cyffredinol
Rydym yn gweithio gyda meddygon, cleifion a rhanddeiliaid eraill i
gynorthwyo gofal da a diogel i gleifion ar draws y DU. Rydym yn gosod y
safonau y bydd angen i feddygon a’r rhai sy’n eu hyfforddi eu bodloni, ac
yn eu helpu i’w cyflawni. Os bydd pryderon efallai na fydd y safonau hyn
yn cael eu cyflawni neu y gallai hyder y cyhoedd mewn meddygon fod mewn
perygl, gallwn ymchwilio, a gweithredu os oes angen.
Efallai bod y neges e-bost hon yn cynnwys gwybodaeth freiniol neu
gyfrinachol, y dylid ei defnyddio at y diben y’i hanfonwyd yn unig.
Os nad chi yw’r derbynnydd neu os ydych chi wedi cael yr e-bost hwn mewn
camgymeriad, peidiwch â’i ddarllen, argraffu, ail-anfon, storio na
gweithredu mewn ffordd sy’n dibynnu arni neu unrhyw atodiadau os gwelwch
yn dda. Dylech anfon e-bost at yr anfonwr ac yna, ei ddileu ar unwaith.
Mae’r Cyngor Meddygol Cyffredinol yn elusen gofrestredig yng Nghymru a
Lloegr (1089278) ac yn Yr Alban (SC037750)
Mae croeso i chi gysylltu â ni yn Gymraeg. Byddwn yn ymateb yn Gymraeg,
heb i hyn achosi oedi ychwanegol.
References
Visible links
1. https://www.gmc-uk.org/
Dear Ms Sollazzi,
Your information request - IR1-4592468771
Thank you for your email dated 11 September.
How we will consider your request
We’re going to consider your request under the Freedom of Information Act
2000 (FOIA). The FOIA gives us 20 working days to respond, but we’ll come
back to you as soon as we can.
Yours sincerely
Information Access Team
General Medical Council
3 Hardman Street
Manchester
M3 3AW
From: Susan Sollazzi <[FOI #1173714 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 11:16 AM
To: FOI <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Qualifications of AA and PA
registrants
Dear General Medical Council, The Medical Act 1983. Part II, 4, details
'Qualifying examinations and primary United Kingdom qualifications'. All
the qualifications are those of doctors. not PAs or AAs. While the
Anaesthesia Associates and Physician
Dear General Medical Council,
The Medical Act 1983. Part II, 4, details 'Qualifying examinations and primary United Kingdom qualifications'. All the qualifications are those of doctors. not PAs or AAs.
While the Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order 2024 has been published more recently, it does not set out the qualifications to be presented by potential registrants who are, or claim to be, AAs or PAs in an equivalent manner.
The GMC’s overarching objective (again I refer to the Medical Act 1983, section 1) is to protect the public, and involves the pursuit of the following objectives:
(a) to protect, promote and maintain the health, safety and well-being of
the public,
(b) to promote and maintain public confidence in the medical profession,
and
(c) to promote and maintain proper professional standards and conduct for
members of that profession
If no training standards are established for AAs and PAs, how is it possible to meet any one of those statutory objectives? Please provide any relevant documents, including minutes of meetings where this issue was discussed.
Yours faithfully,
Susan Sollazzi
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[1][FOI #1173714 email]
Is [2][GMC request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to General Medical Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
[3]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[4]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the latest advice from the ICO:
[5]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
[6]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
Dear Susan Sollazzi,
Your information requests - IR1-4592468771 and IR1-4600579539
Thank you for your emails dated 11 September and 20 September 2024. I have
considered your requests under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA).
I have looked at your two separate requests made on the above dates but
have combined my response as follows.
I am unable to provide you with the information you have requested. This
is because of the amount of data you’ve asked for and the work that would
be involved. Under FOIA there’s an exemption for requests where it would
cost the public authority more than £450 to process - equivalent to 18
hours. This is based on an hourly rate of £25 per hour, which is set by
the Freedom of Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit) Regulations 2004.
This amount is called the ‘appropriate limit.’ To estimate the cost, we
can take into account determining, locating, retrieving and extracting the
information requested.
Amalgamation of requests
When a public authority estimates whether the appropriate limit is likely
to be exceeded, the [1]Freedom of Information and Data Protection
(Appropriate Limit and Fees) Regulations 2004 states that it can include
the costs of complying with two or more requests so long as the requests:
• Relate, to any extent, to the same or similar information, and
• Are received within any period of 60 consecutive working days.
I am including your requests made on 22 July, 5 August, 23 August, 11
September and 20 September 2024 when determining if the ‘appropriate
limit’ is exceeded which relate to information about the regulation of
Physician Associates and/or Anaesthesia Associates. These requests have
been made within a period of 60 consecutive working days.
The exemption
Under the FOIA, the specific exemption which we believe applies is at
section 12. This states that we are not required to comply with a request
if we estimate that the cost of doing so would exceed the appropriate
limit.
In my email of 30 August 2024, I explained that we are not required to
comply with a request if we estimate that the cost of doing so would
exceed the appropriate limit. I also provided a breakdown of how your
amalgamated requests exceeded the cost limit. This was based on 6,003
applications for voluntary erasure since January 2023 and taking 8 minutes
to review each application. Based on an hourly rate of £25 per hour (which
is set by the Freedom of Information (Fees and Appropriate Limit)
Regulations 2004) this would cost us significantly in excess of the
‘appropriate limit’ to process.
I believe that these two requests are also subject to the same exemption
under s.12 FOIA applies when considering your requests collectively in
accordance with the amalgamation rules set out above.
Advice and assistance
You can narrow the scope of any of your previous requests by focusing on
one question or choosing to focus on one of your previous requests.
However, I should add that the s.12 exemption under the FOIA (or another
exemption) may still be applicable to any requests you raise in the
future.
Your right to appeal
If you would like to appeal this decision please set out your reasons in
writing to [2][GMC request email]. Please note that we will only usually
consider appeals received within 40 working days of our response. You can
also appeal to the [3]Information Commissioner, the regulator of the FOIA
and DPA.
Kind regards
Henna Janghir
Information Access Officer
General Medical Council
3 Hardman Street
Manchester
M3 3AW
Email: [4][email address]
Tel: 0161 923 6710
Website: [5]www.gmc-uk.org
From: FOI
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2024 2:47 PM
To: Susan Sollazzi <[FOI #1173714 email]>
Subject: RE: Freedom of Information request - Qualifications of AA and PA
registrants
Dear Ms Sollazzi,
Your information request - IR1-4592468771
Thank you for your email dated 11 September.
How we will consider your request
We’re going to consider your request under the Freedom of Information Act
2000 (FOIA). The FOIA gives us 20 working days to respond, but we’ll come
back to you as soon as we can.
Yours sincerely
Information Access Team
General Medical Council
3 Hardman Street
Manchester
M3 3AW
From: Susan Sollazzi <[6][FOI #1173714 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2024 11:16 AM
To: FOI <[7][email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Qualifications of AA and PA
registrants
Dear General Medical Council, The Medical Act 1983. Part II, 4, details
'Qualifying examinations and primary United Kingdom qualifications'. All
the qualifications are those of doctors. not PAs or AAs. While the
Anaesthesia Associates and Physician
Dear General Medical Council,
The Medical Act 1983. Part II, 4, details 'Qualifying examinations and primary United Kingdom qualifications'. All the qualifications are those of doctors. not PAs or AAs.
While the Anaesthesia Associates and Physician Associates Order 2024 has been published more recently, it does not set out the qualifications to be presented by potential registrants who are, or claim to be, AAs or PAs in an equivalent manner.
The GMC’s overarching objective (again I refer to the Medical Act 1983, section 1) is to protect the public, and involves the pursuit of the following objectives:
(a) to protect, promote and maintain the health, safety and well-being of
the public,
(b) to promote and maintain public confidence in the medical profession,
and
(c) to promote and maintain proper professional standards and conduct for
members of that profession
If no training standards are established for AAs and PAs, how is it possible to meet any one of those statutory objectives? Please provide any relevant documents, including minutes of meetings where this issue was discussed.
Yours faithfully,
Susan Sollazzi
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[8][FOI #1173714 email]
Is [9][GMC request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to General Medical Council? If so, please contact us using this form:
[10]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
[11]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
For more detailed guidance on safely disclosing information, read the latest advice from the ICO:
[12]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
[13]https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www....
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now