POWER

michael john made this Freedom of Information request to Cambridgeshire County Council

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Cambridgeshire County Council should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear Cambridgeshire County Council,

under whose or what authority your corporation is operating under since 2008

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar...

Yours faithfully,

michael john

FOI, Cambridgeshire County Council

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your request, which has been allocated the reference 1035617.

You are reminded that the FOI Act requires that a requestor provides their real name and, on this occasion, we will not proceed with responding to your request until it is provided.

This is in accordance with the Information Commissioner's guidance which is located at: https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio...

Should we not receive this information, we shall consider the request withdrawn after 40 working days.

Yours sincerely,

Business Intelligence Team – Information and Records
Email: [Cambridgeshire County Council request email]
Box No. OCT1224, Cambridgeshire County Council, Shire Hall, Cambridge, CB3 0AP

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,
We believe a “real name “has been provided
Would agents / officers of the person known as Cambridgeshire county council please provide their definition or interpretation of what real is to them, as i have provided the “real name “and legally the full name , it is also duly noted Cambridgeshire county council via their information team have provided numerous Responses to previous requests on many occasions regardless of the name,

Would agents and officers of the Cambridgeshire county council please state for what purpose this question has been asked ?

My full name is Michael John , if you require the “surname ”i am happy to provide this on the condition Cambridgeshire county council and acting agents / officer’s are happy to state for what purpose this would serve, as i am an inhabitant of Cambridgeshire , therefore the beneficiary of the land that the “public office” of Cambridgeshire county council has been intrusted with for and on my behalf in accordance with the law , i.e public servants .

Yours sincerely,

michael john

FOI, Cambridgeshire County Council

Thank you for your email,

The link to the Information Commissioner's guidance provided in our request for your real name provides the information requested.

I trust this answers your questions.

Regards

Business Intelligence Team – Information and Records
Email: [Cambridgeshire County Council request email]
Box No. OCT1224, Cambridgeshire County Council, Shire Hall, Cambridge, CB3 0AP

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,
We find this rather strange ,
we will be issuing your corporation the correct notices / requests in due course , we also remind your information team that since 2008 it would appear that you and the billing authority’s are a private corporation’s , therefore full disclosure should have been provided at the time , this would be considered a breach of trust .

That is why there is no Liability Orders signed or Warrants signed or publication on The Registry Trust. HMTCS and the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 and the 1992 Financial Act Section 3 are being ignored whereby under the treasury’s consolidated fund for mandated services they must supply for inhabitants for free. National Loans Fund, National Loans Act 1968
Logic would dictate that due to this the local billing authority and the person known as cambridgeshire county council are acting outside of the law .

We also remind you of:
The oaths act
Trustees act
Companies act
The terrorism act
You may choose to look away or turn a blind eye but your corporation and acting officers should be aware of what the law is , you may also wish to procrastinate( i.e this request ) but ignorance of the law is no excuse .

Yours sincerely,

michael john

Dear FOI,
For the record we hope you find this to be a
" real name"
:Michael-John and walker ,

as you will see the use of proper nouns something that seems to have escaped the attention of the billing authority , as they have stated under freedom of information they don’t use a style guide / manual ,, which is rather odd considering the government has a style guide sadly it appears according to them” SCDC” they don’t have to use one .

Yours sincerely,

michael john and walker

Mac Pere left an annotation ()

You are on the right track. The term "real" in civil law relates to a thing, movable or unmovable as distinguished from a person. The officers of these legal fictions are concealing much and forcing living persons to be legal fictions which is fraud and much more. The exchange between you here will have to be explained to a Criminal Court. In layman terms, they don't want your real name they want your things' name but that contradicts the Interpretation Act definition of person but because they do not mention person they are asking the name of the thing.

FOI, Cambridgeshire County Council

Dear Michael John

Re: Freedom of Information Request ref: 1035617

I write with reference to your requests for information which were received as follows:

1. Under freedom of information please provide the name of the authorised signatory for ;

Cambridgshire county council
Shire hall
Cambridge
Duns number 219047347

2. We only ask as Alex and Beverly no longer work for SCDC ,

Im only guessing here but looks to me as if their getting out before the shit really hits the fan due to the fact you have all been operating fraudulently since 2008( i.e going private ), which can be evidenced here

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browseedgar?....

Witch would also mean that they would be the liable party in relation to the fraudulant conveyance , that and the fact the council tax recovery team have no authority, other than contract which is gained coercively via the postal service, that and the general ignorance of t he inhabitants of Cambridgeshire witch has made your chief financial officer’s / ceo’s so wealthy in relation to their pensions and salaries .

SHAME ON YOU , SHAME ON YOU ALL

3. Under freedom of information we ask,
Who is the duly authorised officer of the billing authority known as south Cambridgeshire district council , i.e the duly authorised officer who provides a statement of truth in relation to the claims made in Accordance with cpr 7 claim form used against inhabitants at the local magistrates court i.e

Cambridge Magistrates' Court
12 St. Andrews Street
CAMBRIDGE

D-U-N-S Number: " 223263809

In relation to liabiltiy and other Administrative orders , the orders that that should by law be published via the Registry Trust

4. under whose or what authority your corporation is operating under since 2008

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar...

Your requests have been handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act and I am able to advise you that Section 17 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 requires Cambridgeshire County Council, when refusing to provide information to provide the applicant with a notice which:

(a) states that fact,
(b) specifies the exemption in question and
(c) states (if that would not otherwise be apparent) why the exemption
applies.
The exemption applicable is:
S14(1) Vexatious Requests

Section 14(1) states Section 1(1) does not oblige a public authority to comply with requests for information if it considers them to be vexatious.

The Freedom of Information Act was designed to give individuals a greater right of access to official information with the intention of making public bodies more transparent and accountable.
Whilst most people exercise this right responsibly, a few may misuse or abuse the Act by submitting requests which are intended to be annoying or disruptive or which have a disproportionate impact on a public authority.
Dealing with unreasonable requests can place a strain on resources and get in the way of delivering mainstream services or answering legitimate requests. Furthermore, these requests can also damage the reputation of the legislation itself.

Section 14(1) is designed to protect public authorities by allowing them to refuse any requests which have the potential to cause a disproportionate or unjustified level of disruption, irritation or distress.

It is imperative to note that the exemption applies to the information requested rather than the requestor. Future requests from you on the same or substantially similar subjects will neither be acknowledged nor responded to in accordance with this provision.

This email constitutes a formal refusal notice in accordance with the Act.

If you are unhappy with the service you have received in relation to your request and wish to make a complaint or request a review, you should write to Information Management, at either [Cambridgeshire County Council request email] or by post at Box No. OCT1224, Shire Hall, Cambridge CB3 0AP within 40 days of the date of this e-mail.

If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review, you have the right to apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF, or via their website: https://ico.org.uk/.

Generally, the ICO will not undertake a review or make a decision on a request until the internal review process has been completed.

Yours sincerely

David Price
Business Intelligence Team – Information and Records
Tel. 01223 699137, Email: [Cambridgeshire County Council request email]
Box No. OCT1224, Cambridgeshire County Council, Shire Hall, Cambridge, CB3 0AP

show quoted sections

Dear Cambridgeshire County Council,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Cambridgeshire County Council's handling of my FOI request 'POWER'.

It apears agents of the south cambridgedshire county council have bunched one or more requests togeather (not for the first time ) and deemed the freedom of information request POWER to be vexatious i belive this buching of requests would be an attempt to evade the foi request named POWER , please confirm how the request "POWER" is deemed vexatious on its own merits and not of other requests.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/p...

Yours faithfully,

michael john

FOI, Cambridgeshire County Council

Dear Mr John

Re: Freedom of Information Request - Internal Review

We can confirm that your requests were considered individually and assessed as being vexatious in accordance with Section 14(1) of the FOI Act and with reference to the relevant guidance issued by the Information Commissioner's Office. As per the ICO guidance, this includes consideration of the context and history of the request.

https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisatio...

As the same reasoning applied to multiple requests submitted within a short period of time, a single combined response was provided for ease of reference. Our grounds for applying Section 14(1) were explained in full in our response document and has been confirmed upon our Internal Review.

In doing so we restate that future requests from you on the same or substantially similar subjects will neither be acknowledged nor responded to in accordance with this provision; in particular requests that are not seeking recorded information and/or require us to consult webpages and documents that are not clearly relevant to the County Council. This applies to the four requests submitted between 4-7 April (1063595 POWER Mk2 - the authority we are operating under (04/04/2019), 1063609 Billing (05/04/2019), 1063621 Billing authorities oath (1) (06/04/2019), 1063638 Billing authorities oath (2) (07/04/2019)).

Should you remain dissatisfied you have the right to apply directly to the Information Commissioner for a decision. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF, or via their website: https://ico.org.uk/.

Yours sincerely

Corporate Information and Records
Cambridgeshire County Council

show quoted sections

Dear FOI,
It is due to the evasive nature of the men and women acting for and on behalf of both the county and district council that these requests were made , it is duly noted “the team” has addressed Mr John, is there any specific reason for this as “the team” has never used what i can only assume to be some form of title before , sadly the duly authorised officers of the" Billing authority" have stated that “MR” is not part of my personal information therefore are unable to tell me what this means , i would advise that you address me by my name “michael John” , logic would also dictate if neither the county or district council are able to provide their meanings for words such as you , yours , MR, Miss, upon documentation sent to inhabitants of Cambridgeshire then it is not written printed in a plain language pursuant to the Gdpr 2018.

When a corporation has been asked for clarification and provides none, in my eyes this is to be considered as evasive , unfortunately it also appears the courts are involved as well , as no liability order or (copy of complaint )can be found on the registry trust where it should be published in accordance with the law .
It has been made very clear that the county council does not hold information on basic legislation however all be it extremely well versed in freedom of information act etc , if my requests are deemed to be vexatious then i can only apologise this was not intended , i merely wish to ascertain how the collection/ enforcement of council tax is in the best interest of the inhabitants of Cambridgeshire ,sadly when addressing such matters no comment is provided ,, just more documentation that can not be interpreted by its author therefore no meeting of minds has occurred, its duly noted when asking the court and the county who the authorised signatories are in relation to the companies act 2006 it goes rather quite .

It should be fairly obvious at this point what is occurring if the officer dealing with this can provide the meanings for the words “MR” “you”” your” it might help me michael John better Comprehend what or who is being addressed or CONVEYED .

Definitions of : you , would mean the men and women with presence of mind acting for and on behalf of body corporate known as Cambridshire county council.

Definitions of : i , me would mean michael John the man with presence of mind .

Yours sincerely,

michael john

michael john left an annotation ()

Linear warfare i believe would be the correct term,
asking the author of a document what is meant or being addressed/conveyed is a simple question, sadly “YOU” can not provide any meaning or authenticity at law, sadly .

Trust .

Regards
Michael John and Walker.