[potentially defamatory material removed] Cheadle Mill residential property
Dear Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council,
[Request removed due to the presence of potentially defamatory material.
The request asked why the council allowed the building of a residential development at Cheadle Mill, and why it continues to allow building there.
]
Yours faithfully,
[Name removed]
Dear Ms [Name removed],
Thank you for your request for information (FOI 45924) submitted under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 which has been given the above mentioned reference number. Please quote this on any correspondence regarding your request.
Stockport Council will respond to your request within 20 working days from the date of receipt. If there will be a charge for disbursements e.g. photocopying in order to provide the information, we will inform you as soon as possible to see if you wish to proceed; however such charges are usually waived if they amount to less than £10.
Yours sincerely,
Fahmida Firdaws
Advanced Apprentice
Information Governance, Stopford House (UG South)
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, SK1 3XE
Tel: 0161 474 4299
Dear Ms [Name removed],
I am writing in response to your request for information (FOI 45924).
The relevant Council Service(s) has searched for the requested information
and our response is as follows:
[extraneous and potentially defamatory material removed] [extraneous and
potentially defamatory material removed] [extraneous and potentially
defamatory material removed] [extraneous and potentially defamatory material removed]
[extraneous and potentially defamatory material removed] [extraneous and
potentially defamatory material removed] a "clear breach of planning
control."
[extraneous and potentially defamatory material removed] [extraneous and
potentially defamatory material removed] [extraneous and potentially
defamatory material removed] actively marketing the property, I would like
to know why the Council[extraneous and potentially defamatory material
removed]
[extraneous and potentially defamatory material removed] [extraneous and
potentially defamatory material removed][extraneous and potentially
defamatory material removed]
[extraneous and potentially defamatory material removed][extraneous and
potentially defamatory material removed]
Planning permission was granted for the development subject to conditions
that the developer built the scheme in accordance with the approved plans
[potentially defamatory material removed]
[potentially defamatory material removed] . [potentially defamatory
material removed] [potentially defamatory material removed] [potentially
defamatory material removed] [potentially defamatory material removed]
[potentially defamatory material removed]
[potentially defamatory material removed] [potentially defamatory
material removed] [potentially defamatory material removed] [potentially
defamatory material removed] [potentially defamatory material removed]
[potentially defamatory material removed] .
If you are unhappy with the way we have handled your request for
information, you are entitled to ask for an internal review; however you
must do so within 40 working days of the date of this response. Any
internal review will be carried out by a senior member of staff who was
not involved with your original request. To ask for an internal review,
contact [1][email address] in the first instance.
If you are unhappy with the outcome of any internal review, you are
entitled to complain to the Information Commissioner. To do so, contact:
Information Commissioner’s Office
Wycliffe House
Water Lane
Wilmslow
Cheshire
SK9 5AF
[2]www.ico.gov.uk
01625 545 745
Yours sincerely,
Danial Farooq
Freedom of Information Officer
Information Governance, Stopford House (Upper Ground South)
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council, SK1 3XE
Tel: 0161 474 2388
It’s National Clean Air Day on 21st June. Will you make a [3]pledge to
help us tackle air pollution?
Confidentiality:- This email, its contents and any attachments are
intended only for the above named. As the email may contain confidential
or legally privileged information, if you are not, or suspect that you are
not, the above named or the person responsible for delivery of the message
to the above named, please delete or destroy the email and any attachments
immediately and inform the sender of the error.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email%20address]
2. http://www.ico.gov.uk/
http://www.ico.gov.uk/
3. https://www.tfgm.com/air
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.
Donate Now
Richard Taylor left an annotation ()
It is very unusual for us at WhatDoTheyKnow to decide not to publish
a substantive response to a Freedom of Information request due to
defamation concerns. There have only been two such cases in over half
a million requests which we've handled, both cases involved matters
which were potentially of substantial public interest.
While we at WhatDoTheyKnow are not currently prepared to publish the
council's response due to risks arising from the state of defamation
law we are prepared to make the material available to journalists, and
will consider requests from others such as elected representatives,
and regulators.
We have advertised the fact we are holding this material and have
proactively approached relevant journalists. We understand a number of
journalists are considering the matter.
-- Richard, WhatDoTheyKnow.com volunteer