Dear Ministry of Defence Police,
1. The police make an "Attestation" as follows All UK Police
swear this "Attestation"
"I, .. .. of .. .. do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm
will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of constable,
fairness, integrity, diligence and impartiality, upholding
human rights and according equal respect to all people; and that I
to the best of my power, cause the peace to be kept and preserved
prevent all offences against people and property; and that while I
continue to hold the said office I will to the best of my skill and
knowledge discharge all the duties thereof faithfully according to
What is the definition of serve?
What is the definition of the Queen, which Queen are you referring
What is the definition of Constable?
What is the definition of people?
What is the definition of discharge?
What is the definition of offences?
What is the definition of property?
Are International laws higher than domestic laws?
6. Why is the following law not being given due diligence and who
responsible for enforcing it?
1. Article 25.3(c) Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
includes the phrase "including providing the means for the
the crime", the 'means' incorporates the money, materials, weapons
armed forces personnel needed to commit one or more of the 4 ICC
(genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression).
2. Section 52 of The International Criminal Court Act 2001 or
Section 2 of
the International Criminal Court [Scotland] Act 2001. This
makes it a criminal offence in Britain to engage in "conduct
genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and the
on to define ancillary conduct as behaviour which falls under The
Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.
3. The Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal provides the relevant
the section quoted in the article
" It was submitted [by the defendants] that international law is
with the action of sovereign states, and provides no punishment for
individuals; and further, that where the act in question is an act
state, those who carry it out are not personally responsible, but
protected by the doctrine of the sovereignty of the State. In the
of the Tribunal, both these submissions must be rejected. That
international law imposes duties and liabilities upon individuals
as upon States has long been recognised…
The very essence of the Charter is that individuals have
duties which transcend the national obligations of obedience
the individual State. He who violates the laws of war cannot obtain
immunity while acting in pursuance of the authority of the State,
State in authorising action moves outside its competence under
Nuremburg War Crimes Tribunal 1946
Dear Ms Gomez,
Please see attached.
Data Protection Officer & Freedom of Information Manager
Military: 94667 4399
Civilian: 01371 854399
Fax: 01371 854080
Email: [email address]
or [email address]
Dear Ms Gomez,
Please see attached in response to your Freedom of Information request.
If you have any queries please do not hesitate to contact me.
Many thanks and kind regards
We work to defend the right to FOI for everyone
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. Donate and support our work.Donate Now