Please supply the accounts for all the items seized by the courts in relation to birds and the accounts for how much money was generated for the Crown by the sale of the item or do the items end up with the RSPB, the Police and helpers of the police. This includes book, binoculars, stuffed animals/birds or live and so on.

Derek Canning LLB [HONS] made this Freedom of Information request to Northumbria Police This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

Waiting for an internal review by Northumbria Police of their handling of this request.

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please supply all the information that you hold on the items and birds seized by the courts in my case and if the items were sold for the public purse or was my property given away to the RSPB or the Police and helpers of the police/RSPB.

Please supply the accounts for all the items seized by the courts in relation to birds and the accounts for how much money was generated for the Crown by the sale of the item or do the items end up with the RSPB, the Police and helpers of the police/RSPB. This includes book, binoculars, stuffed animals/birds or live and so on.

Yours faithfully,

Derek Canning LLB[hons]

DAVID STREET (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY A PC THAT THE STUFF GETS SHARED OUT BETWEEN THE RSPB AND THE POLICE BUT IF YOU WOULD BE KIND ENOUGH TO SHOW THE BILL OF SALE S AND EVEDNCE WERE ALL THE STUFF GOES I NOW THE RSPB ARE TAKING A LOT OF BOOKS AT THE MOMENT WHICH ARE COLLECTORS ITEMS THEY TOOK 15 OF MINE THAT I VALUE AT ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY POUNDS EACH THE REASON THEY ARE WORTH SO MUCH IS BECAUSE THE RSPB HAVE MANAGED TO PESWAD THE JUDGES TO CONFORSKATE THEM BUT IF YOU WERE BRICKING THE LAW BI HAVE ING THEM WHY IS THERE COPES IN MOST LIBRYS AND MUSEUMS AND WHY DO THEY COME UP FOR SALE NOW AND THEN ON THE INTERNET ALL THE BOOKS ARE DOING IS TELLING YOU WERE YOU CAN GO AND WACH THESE BIRDS BUT THEY TAKE THEM OFF YOU THEN THE RSPB GO AND TELL YOU WERE THEY BREAD AND CHARGE YOU MONEY TO GO AND SE THEM WHEN THE BOOKS WERE PRINTED SOME OF THE BIRDS WERE RARE BUT NOT ANY MORE THERE ARE KITES AND OSPREYS AND PERIGRIN FALCONS BREADING ALL OVER THE UK

Derek Canning LLB [HONS] (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

I have heard that too.

DAVID STREET (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

could you please tell me why when guy shorrik raided mr armstrong one mounth a go he did not take the same books as he took off my as i have spoken to mr armstrong and he said he took the same typ off stuff as he took off me but he left the very same books i have spoke about in other emails surly if these books were took off me then they should have been took off mr armstrong or is it just an easy way to try and ly and set me up wich he has done to so many peaple i am not slandering shorrik as i hav the court transscripts and emails from defra animal health and a pc from youkshire police i now i am going on but it is nothing agenst wot do they no i just wont the truth wich the police are not giveing me thank you david street

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Yet again the Police are breaking the law when asked to supply information that is potentially embarrassing or even worse. Given this fact I would further add to my information request on top of my request for an internal review which is the number of times Northumbria Police have not released the information requested within the time laid down in law and what percentage that makes up of the total information requests. On top of that I want to make an information request for any surveys you have that reflect the public’s dissatisfaction of the police or otherwise.

Out of the entire organisation that we have made information requests of the police is the only organisation that has not released any information: COVER UP POTENTIALLY. This statement may annoy you but it was the police that came into our lives uninvited with a corrupt organisation hell bent on convictions right or wrong to generate money through publicity. Object fixation has no place in relation to investigating crimes as stated in the Myatt case about an RSPB worker [I have all the details].

It is up to the police to get their house in order and that especially mean stop handing evidence over to members of the public of charitable organisation especially to individuals that have a catalogue of complaints of perverting the course of justice. Furthermore, members of the public should not be allowed to control evidence unsupervised by the police as has occurred routinely in the past resulting in evidence being withheld or disappearing. I would challenges you to ask me to prove what I have just said as I would be delighted to supply you with the evidence that we have so the police can do their duty to us and the Crown and there by applying our human rights by correctly investigating our genuine complaints of the same organisation do the same thing to the same class of people with an interest in birds and animals.

If I become another Dr David Kelly this will not stop the public seeing the evidence as other people have the evidence that will be going on internet to embarrass the police into doing their duty to use and the Crown and indeed justify the money that they are paid by use all: PUBLIC SERVANTS .

At the end of the day what we are asking is simply for the police to investigate our complaints and then to prosecute the real guilty parties which is our right and what we pay our taxis for.

In search of justice and the truth: it would seem it does not come as of right we have to beg for it from our public servants.

Yours faithfully,

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Northumbria Police's handling of my FOI request 'Please supply the accounts for all the items seized by the courts in relation to birds and the accounts for how much money was generated for the Crown by the sale of the item or do the items end up with the RSPB, the Police and helpers of the police. This includes book, binoculars, stuffed animals/birds or live and so on.'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/pl...

Yours faithfully,

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Northumbria Police

As you are aware you have previously been declared vexatious on this
subject area and informed that no further Freedom of Information requests
on this subject, avian genetics, or in relation to your court case
concerning offences under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 will be
answered or acknowledged.

Please be advised that Northumbria Police now considers this matter closed
and no further correspondence will be entered into on this subject area.

Yours sincerely

Michael Cleugh
Data Protection and Disclosure Advisor

From: "Derek Canning LLB [HONS]"
<[FOI #14092 email]> on 21/09/2009 01:36 CET

To: FOI requests at Northumbria Police
<[Northumbria Police request email]>
cc:
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Please
supply the accounts for all the items seized by the courts in relation to
birds and the accounts for how much money was generated for the
Crown by the sale of the item or do the items end up with the RSPB, the
Police and helpers of the police. This includes book, binoculars, stuffed
animals/birds or live and so on.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of
Information reviews.

I am writing to request an internal review of Northumbria Police's
handling of my FOI request 'Please supply the accounts for all the
items seized by the courts in relation to birds and the accounts
for how much money was generated for the Crown by the sale of the
item or do the items end up with the RSPB, the Police and helpers
of the police. This includes book, binoculars, stuffed
animals/birds or live and so on.'.

A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is
available on the Internet at this address:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/pl...

Yours faithfully,

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

show quoted sections

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.

This is a perfectly reasonable information request. Stop using the word vexatious to cover up far reaching information.

Yours faithfully,

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

Dear Sir or Madam,

Please explain why Northumbria police are calling my information requests vexatious and why one police force released the information requested yet when I made the same information request to Northumbria I was informed my information request was vexatious? If you have nothing to hide or feel ASHAMED about then release the information requested into the public domain and let the public who pay your wages and you you serve judge for themselves. This is democracy at work as opposed to police a state as you seem to to want.

I am asking for accountability and transparency which you have a DUTY TO PROVIDE.

Note the police letter below that show Northumbria police have double standards.

Download original attachment
(Word document) This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'items seized'.

Request

"could you please tell me wot happens to items seized when some one is convickded of a e fence that involves the rspb eg wild life crime eg books cameras binoculars are they given to the rspb or are they sold could you please supply the informashon eg were they were sold and how much for a receps for them of tell me wot happens to them"

Reply

If someone is convicted of a Wildlife Offence or any Offence the Judge or Magistrate can make an order for the destruction or the offender can sign a disclaimer and they are either destroyed of put to good use.

In 2007, a bird egg collector received a custodial sentence. The district Judge and the CPS got the offender to sign a disclaimer for most of the equipment which they owned and also the Judge ordered that item that they did not disclaim would not be returned to them. Most of the equipment has been placed on National Display, some equipment was destroyed and some sent to the Wildlife Crime Unit. The Egg collection itself was sent to the National History Museum.

Document 1

Lincolnshire Police in complying with their statutory duty under sections 1 and 11 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to release the enclosed information will not breach the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. However, the rights of the copyright owner of the enclosed information will continue to be protected by law. Applications for the copyright owner's written permission to reproduce any part of the attached information should be addressed to The Force Solicitor, Lincolnshire Police, PO Box 999, Lincoln LN5 7PH

Yours faithfully,

Derek Canning LLB [HONS]

DAVID STREET (Account suspended) left an annotation ()

CAN YOU tell me why every thing we ask you say you will not anser because it is vexatious yet other police forces are ancering the same post this is just a cover up by northumbria police wot have you got to hide it will all come out in the end thank you david street