Dear Dacorum Borough Council,

Re: Planning application Ref. No: 4/00123/18/FHA 42 Crouchfield

I would be grateful if you could supply all correspondence and case officer notes regarding this planning application.

Yours faithfully,

A Lovegrove

Dear Dacorum Borough Council,

You have not replied to my FOI it is my understanding that you should have responded promptly by law in no more then 20 days. Please can you advise if you have a problem with my request and if so what the issue is.
Yours faithfully,

A Lovegrove

Freedom Of Information Mailbox, Dacorum Borough Council

Dear Helen,
Thank you for your request.
Please note the Ref No/Target Date above - your request has been routed to the relevant department for consideration.
'Automatically Generated e-mail.'

The information in this message should be regarded as confidential and is intended for the addressee only unless explicitly stated. If you have received this message in error it must be deleted and the sender notified. The views expressed in this message are personal and not necessarily those of Dacorum Borough Council unless explicitly stated. Please be aware that emails sent to or received from Dacorum Borough Council may be intercepted and read by the council. Interception will only occur to ensure compliance with council policies or procedures or regulatory obligations, to prevent or deter crime, or for the purposes of essential maintenance or support of the email system.

Andrew Horner, Dacorum Borough Council

5 Attachments

Please find attached the Council's response to your FOI set out below and the second request contained in the attached e-mail.

Thank you

Andrew

Andrew Horner
Group Manager
Development Management and Planning
Dacorum Borough Council
T: 01442 228289
E: [email address]
A: The Forum | Marlowes | Hemel Hempstead | HP1 1DN

show quoted sections

Dear Andrew Horner,
I note you have combined my FOI requests reference FOI 5960 and have sent me the information which is easily accessed via your website as it should be. However, the information I require is the Planning Officer's case notes and any correspondence that DOES NOT APPEAR on your planning website. Legislation requires that any correspondence either by post or email received or sent in response to an application has to be available for inspection by the applicant or anyone else interested in the application. My understanding is that because of this you cannot take into account comments that are marked "confidential". I have asked for correspondence and the officers case notes, why would the officers case notes fall under the section 41 clause regarding confidentiality? Planning information is and should be a public record as it useful for others to have access to this information I am sure you agree. In which case why are these two applications so different?

Yours sincerely,

Helen Pollard and A Lovegrove

Looking for an EU Authority?

You can request documents directly from EU Institutions at our sister site AskTheEU.org . Find out more .

AskTheEU.org